ETS 57 trim Dyno Graph

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Aug 31, 2007 | 10:33 AM

#16

uglyevo

Thread Starter

Evolving Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

From: Alaska

Quote:

Originally Posted by eve-slow

Ya bro. Nice numbers bro!.......bro

do you know who thats suppose to be?

Aug 31, 2007 | 10:41 AM

#17

DS-03evo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 822

Likes: 0

From: Central PA

Sounds great...what did you put down on just pump gas?

Aug 31, 2007 | 09:13 PM

#18

Duby

Evolved Member

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 576

Likes: 0

From: Annandale, NJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by uglyevo

do you know who thats suppose to be?

yea, the first imitation wasn't to bad tll he forgot what else to say

Aug 31, 2007 | 11:32 PM

#19

uglyevo

Thread Starter

Evolving Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

From: Alaska

Quote:

Originally Posted by DS-03evo

Sounds great...what did you put down on just pump gas?

didn't do one on pump since I was on E90. however another car with the same kit on the same dyno made 403whp on pump 92

Sep 1, 2007 | 03:29 AM

#20

1mad evo

Evolving Member

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 283

Likes: 0

i dont understand, is the torque at the wheels or the flywheel? because if its at the flywheel than its pretty low, i would have thought it to be at least 450 tq atf ???

Sep 1, 2007 | 08:34 AM

#21

uglyevo

Thread Starter

Evolving Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

From: Alaska

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1mad evo

i dont understand, is the torque at the wheels or the flywheel? because if its at the flywheel than its pretty low, i would have thought it to be at least 450 tq atf ???

torque has never been high on 50 trim based turbos in comparison to hp

Sep 1, 2007 | 08:45 AM

#22

EvoDan2004

Evolved Member

iTrader: (94)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 8,984

Likes: 8

From: New Jersey

and trq is lower yet then normal because of stock cams.

Sep 1, 2007 | 10:08 AM

#23

EV0lved

Evolved Member

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 542

Likes: 0

From: wishing i still lived in Spokane

fuggin awesome

Sep 1, 2007 | 10:13 AM

#24

scorke

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 5,192

Likes: 0

From: Nj

Did you do any straight pump pulls? Without cams or seeing other turbos or a pump gas number I am not sure if its making good numbers or poor ones...

Scorke

Sep 1, 2007 | 10:29 AM

#25

4DR

Evolved Member

iTrader: (27)

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 519

Likes: 0

From: New York

Good Numbers. But how is it stated that your 1200cc injectors and pump were maxed out/maxing out?? I would think those injectors would be enough to out-do your turbo.

Sep 1, 2007 | 10:31 AM

#26

scorke

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 5,192

Likes: 0

From: Nj

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4DR

Good Numbers. But how is it stated that your 1200cc injectors and pump were maxed out/maxing out?? I would think those injectors would be enough to out-do your turbo.

Ethanol requires a lot more fuel to be burned to run at safe A/F's...E90 has less gasoline in it than E85 which requires about 30 percent more fuel.

On C16 30+ psi and 500+whp is probably attainable.

Scorke

Sep 1, 2007 | 10:40 AM

#27

Lucas English

Evolved Member

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 793

Likes: 10

From: Camas, WA

I would say 5 pulls were due to dyno carp and the other 5-8 were Duggy getting his Greddy boost control dialed in so it would not bounce all over the place.