First Mod?? {devil}
Originally posted by lancealott
I used to own an Eclipse GST and changed out the bov and the intake. The intake allowed a larger whoosh sound with the turbo spooling up, but had no affect on any sound with the bov.
I used to own an Eclipse GST and changed out the bov and the intake. The intake allowed a larger whoosh sound with the turbo spooling up, but had no affect on any sound with the bov.
Originally posted by EVOPILOT214
Where can I get info on installing mods..for example an intake....I would like to see what im getting into before I realize that I just spent a lot of money on something I cant install...Does anybody know of any good shops in OKC that work on EVO 8s....
Where can I get info on installing mods..for example an intake....I would like to see what im getting into before I realize that I just spent a lot of money on something I cant install...Does anybody know of any good shops in OKC that work on EVO 8s....
Shiv, I had it dyno'ed at XS Engineering. The baseline was 220 whp, with the intake and downpipe it was 249 and then 279 with the ECU reflash. Their dyno is down right now, but Rhys Millen and the boys are guesstimating another 20 hp to come from the exhaust (the exhaust alone would be about 12 hp, but coupled with the ECU flash, it should account for the added 8). Hence, about 300 whp. Once XS is up and running, I will get over there and post the sheets. I am not trying to show anyone up (ie with big fake dyno numbers). I just want people to get a realistic idea of what kind of mods do what.
BTW Shiv, what would 300 whp translate to in bhp (ie crank hp)??
I am thinking about 350...
BTW Shiv, what would 300 whp translate to in bhp (ie crank hp)??
I am thinking about 350...
Chris in HB: You should be able to calculate crank HP through drivetrain loss which I've heard is around 23% (IIRC). THen do the old cross multiply where you have 77% over 100% (drivetrain efficiency over crank efficiancy) and cross multiply it with 300 over x, which would be wheel hp over crank hp (x). THen divide 77x into the number and, by my calculations, you get roughly 389hp. I hope I remembered the math correctly, it's been a long time.
GPTourer: I'm guessing the Buschur Racing upper hardpipe kit is around 300 bucks. Of course, you either have to relocate your battery or get a smaller one, but that's a good upgrade too. When Buschur releases their lower IC piping kit, I'm guessing that will be reasonable too.
GPTourer: I'm guessing the Buschur Racing upper hardpipe kit is around 300 bucks. Of course, you either have to relocate your battery or get a smaller one, but that's a good upgrade too. When Buschur releases their lower IC piping kit, I'm guessing that will be reasonable too.
I think payment for my math should be a ride in your car. I'm in orange county (Corona Del Mar) almost every Thursday : ) j/k (unless of course you want to
)
Um, I bet that Cobra driver was surprised, huh?
)Um, I bet that Cobra driver was surprised, huh?
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by atlvalet
Chris in HB: You should be able to calculate crank HP through drivetrain loss which I've heard is around 23% (IIRC). THen do the old cross multiply where you have 77% over 100% (drivetrain efficiency over crank efficiancy) and cross multiply it with 300 over x, which would be wheel hp over crank hp (x). THen divide 77x into the number and, by my calculations, you get roughly 389hp. I hope I remembered the math correctly, it's been a long time.
Chris in HB: You should be able to calculate crank HP through drivetrain loss which I've heard is around 23% (IIRC). THen do the old cross multiply where you have 77% over 100% (drivetrain efficiency over crank efficiancy) and cross multiply it with 300 over x, which would be wheel hp over crank hp (x). THen divide 77x into the number and, by my calculations, you get roughly 389hp. I hope I remembered the math correctly, it's been a long time.
Recently, a heavily modified EVO (running a GT 28/35 turbo, remap, full exhaust, cams, etc,.) which dyno'd at ~380 wheel hp at Brainstorm later dyno'd at ~280 wheel hp on our in-house dyno. That's how different two dynos can read.
Just for a reality check, 400bhp Porsche 911 Turbos puts down 300-300 wheel hp on our dyno
And the new water cooled Porsche Turbos have put down as much as 345 wheel hp on our dyno.... stock!Cheers,
shiv
Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Jul 5, 2003 at 11:41 PM.
Originally posted by atlvalet
I think payment for my math should be a ride in your car. I'm in orange county (Corona Del Mar) almost every Thursday : ) j/k (unless of course you want to
)
Um, I bet that Cobra driver was surprised, huh?
I think payment for my math should be a ride in your car. I'm in orange county (Corona Del Mar) almost every Thursday : ) j/k (unless of course you want to
)Um, I bet that Cobra driver was surprised, huh?
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
That's grossly optimistic. The DTS dyno at Brainstorm is calibrated to read even higher than Dynojets (the previous record holder for big numbers). There's a recent story in Turbo magazine comparing several different dynos with the same car on the same day. It was the most optimistic of the lot by a significant margin.
Recently, a heavily modified EVO (running a GT 28/35 turbo, remap, full exhaust, cams, etc,.) which dyno'd at ~380 wheel hp at Brainstorm later dyno'd at ~280 wheel hp on our in-house dyno. That's how different two dynos can read.
Just for a reality check, 400bhp Porsche 911 Turbos puts down 300-300 wheel hp on our dyno
And the new water cooled Porsche Turbos have put down as much as 345 wheel hp on our dyno.... stock!
Cheers,
shiv
That's grossly optimistic. The DTS dyno at Brainstorm is calibrated to read even higher than Dynojets (the previous record holder for big numbers). There's a recent story in Turbo magazine comparing several different dynos with the same car on the same day. It was the most optimistic of the lot by a significant margin.
Recently, a heavily modified EVO (running a GT 28/35 turbo, remap, full exhaust, cams, etc,.) which dyno'd at ~380 wheel hp at Brainstorm later dyno'd at ~280 wheel hp on our in-house dyno. That's how different two dynos can read.
Just for a reality check, 400bhp Porsche 911 Turbos puts down 300-300 wheel hp on our dyno
And the new water cooled Porsche Turbos have put down as much as 345 wheel hp on our dyno.... stock!Cheers,
shiv
I had my car dyno'ed at XS Engineering. I don't believe their dyno is that optimistic. Regardless, the net whp gain was approx. 80 with the mods. Going by the Mitsu factory bhp, that would mean about 350 bhp, which was sort of my target.
Chris
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Actually, I mean to say XS Engineering, not Brainstorm (although they both have the same type of dyno). So yes, they both read very high. Higher than Dynojets, from what I've seen and as illustrated in the Turbo mag tech story.
Shiv
Shiv
Shiv,
(Last time, I promise)
Regardless of the baseline (180-220), the net 80 whp is a very worthwhile gain in my book for a $2300 outlay. My last car was an S2000 and $2300 might have gained me 5-6 hp with possibly a 2 hp loss somewhere before VTEC. So you can understand my pleasure.
Thanks for all of the responses. I read about a lot of your work in SCC.
(Last time, I promise)
Regardless of the baseline (180-220), the net 80 whp is a very worthwhile gain in my book for a $2300 outlay. My last car was an S2000 and $2300 might have gained me 5-6 hp with possibly a 2 hp loss somewhere before VTEC. So you can understand my pleasure.
Thanks for all of the responses. I read about a lot of your work in SCC.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by Shahul X
Altered Atmosphere uses a Dynojet and a base Evo was doing mid 220's....
Shiv you were there
-Shahul
Altered Atmosphere uses a Dynojet and a base Evo was doing mid 220's....
Shiv you were there
-Shahul

Cheers,
shiv
Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Jul 6, 2003 at 10:15 AM.



