Anyone have experience w/ VP "Q16"
Anyone have experience w/ VP "Q16"
Been trying to find a good alternative to the fuel we currently use ERC 118.
It works very well and has very high anti-detonation but it costs us an arm and a leg compared to VP C16.
I called the tech center and they said it would be a good match for our application being the Q16 has a faster burn rate but would require 10-12% more fuel since it is oxygenated.
It's much less than what we run and has a oct rating of 116 but they say it also has anti-detonation values 6-8 points higher.
Anyone trying this stuff out?
It works very well and has very high anti-detonation but it costs us an arm and a leg compared to VP C16.
I called the tech center and they said it would be a good match for our application being the Q16 has a faster burn rate but would require 10-12% more fuel since it is oxygenated.
It's much less than what we run and has a oct rating of 116 but they say it also has anti-detonation values 6-8 points higher.
Anyone trying this stuff out?
I actually talked to Mark at TTR yesterday about this. He said they have used it and had very good success..
Was tellling me they made almost 700whp on their dynojet on 2.0/35r!
I was going to switch to using it, but my local VP vendor does not have it in stock, and does not keep it in stock. C16 they do, so I'll stick with it for now.
Was tellling me they made almost 700whp on their dynojet on 2.0/35r!
I was going to switch to using it, but my local VP vendor does not have it in stock, and does not keep it in stock. C16 they do, so I'll stick with it for now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scottr126
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 24, 2010 06:57 AM
fromWRXtoEVO
Water / Methanol Injection / Nitrous Oxide
3
Dec 18, 2005 08:04 AM




