Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Anyone have experience w/ VP "Q16"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 07:57 AM
  #1  
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 1
From: CALIFORNIA
Anyone have experience w/ VP "Q16"

Been trying to find a good alternative to the fuel we currently use ERC 118.

It works very well and has very high anti-detonation but it costs us an arm and a leg compared to VP C16.

I called the tech center and they said it would be a good match for our application being the Q16 has a faster burn rate but would require 10-12% more fuel since it is oxygenated.

It's much less than what we run and has a oct rating of 116 but they say it also has anti-detonation values 6-8 points higher.

Anyone trying this stuff out?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 10:03 AM
  #2  
ExViTermini's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 13
From: Virginia
I actually talked to Mark at TTR yesterday about this. He said they have used it and had very good success..

Was tellling me they made almost 700whp on their dynojet on 2.0/35r!


I was going to switch to using it, but my local VP vendor does not have it in stock, and does not keep it in stock. C16 they do, so I'll stick with it for now.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #3  
hacellular's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: NJ
VP 103 is the shiiiiit... but thats on my stock motor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scottr126
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 24, 2010 06:57 AM
TurbotrixRacing
Northeast Region
7
Sep 14, 2008 06:54 AM
Bioxide02
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
20
Apr 10, 2008 12:39 PM
RnR Racing
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
14
Sep 6, 2006 02:59 PM
fromWRXtoEVO
Water / Methanol Injection / Nitrous Oxide
3
Dec 18, 2005 08:04 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 AM.