my power curve...** :) **
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
well i tune a lot and that first dip is not the spike coming down, that is because you experienced knock there i guarantee it.... if you didnt, then there is something wrong with the graph. That is definitely timing being pulled
I agree with most on the choppy plot....looks like some knock counts that are screwing up your chart...also....if the preset car definition was set up for the stock weight (which i don't see why it would be any other way) then that '772' number in the weight content is really hiking up your numbers higher then they are supposed to be....
Here is my race gas map with the mods below...the benchmark is with the correct weight factors and the higher numbers are with the incorrect weight factor...
Here is my race gas map with the mods below...the benchmark is with the correct weight factors and the higher numbers are with the incorrect weight factor...
Well it calculates time, acc , etc
so if you tell it that it has 772 lb of weight extra it will factor that and obviously it would show more power....
do you weight 772 pounds ?????????
or did you do this run with, the whole family and dog in the car
And you cranked the smoothing factor to 7!!
put it at 5 then it will look like a heart beat, 420hp is not going to happen on a stock turbo without meth/race gas and you gonna need over 30psi..........
so if you tell it that it has 772 lb of weight extra it will factor that and obviously it would show more power....
do you weight 772 pounds ?????????
or did you do this run with, the whole family and dog in the car

And you cranked the smoothing factor to 7!!
put it at 5 then it will look like a heart beat, 420hp is not going to happen on a stock turbo without meth/race gas and you gonna need over 30psi..........
Last edited by Whoop_ass; Oct 18, 2007 at 11:27 PM.
If everyone would stop flaming and read dbx's comments! He's gonna get 'real' dynoed soon, this is a road run with many factors involved.. Add to this the fact that he's also mentioning the difference in power he made due to the new mods and not the ultimate power as such..
I've been in his car and yes it's scary fast so let's judge the process of charting, which happens to be Evoscan software, and not the tune itself..
My car has been tuned along with his car and now pulls so much the clutch (a new exedy hyper single) is slipping away..
The tuner is a great guy, comes from a far eastern 'school' of race tuning, he road tunes for long hours (took him more than 15hours to finish mine) and i know he's used the very right methods and softwares to get a very fine no-knock ultimate power result..
Wael
I've been in his car and yes it's scary fast so let's judge the process of charting, which happens to be Evoscan software, and not the tune itself..
My car has been tuned along with his car and now pulls so much the clutch (a new exedy hyper single) is slipping away..
The tuner is a great guy, comes from a far eastern 'school' of race tuning, he road tunes for long hours (took him more than 15hours to finish mine) and i know he's used the very right methods and softwares to get a very fine no-knock ultimate power result..
Wael
Sorry, but you're not making 400whp Dyno Dynamics on the stock turbo...
You're not.
And your DLL chart is completely useless... with clearly not enough smoothing, your numbers will be exaggerated. Not to mention the ridiculously high contents weight
You're not.
And your DLL chart is completely useless... with clearly not enough smoothing, your numbers will be exaggerated. Not to mention the ridiculously high contents weight
Why dont you just replot the graph with the correct content weight and see what you come up with. It would be much less than what is showing, but at least closer to correct. To me content weight = me + what ever other crap sitting around in the seats(gymbag, basketball, shoes, etc)
If everyone would stop flaming and read dbx's comments! He's gonna get 'real' dynoed soon, this is a road run with many factors involved.. Add to this the fact that he's also mentioning the difference in power he made due to the new mods and not the ultimate power as such..
I've been in his car and yes it's scary fast so let's judge the process of charting, which happens to be Evoscan software, and not the tune itself..
My car has been tuned along with his car and now pulls so much the clutch (a new exedy hyper single) is slipping away..
The tuner is a great guy, comes from a far eastern 'school' of race tuning, he road tunes for long hours (took him more than 15hours to finish mine) and i know he's used the very right methods and softwares to get a very fine no-knock ultimate power result..
Wael
I've been in his car and yes it's scary fast so let's judge the process of charting, which happens to be Evoscan software, and not the tune itself..
My car has been tuned along with his car and now pulls so much the clutch (a new exedy hyper single) is slipping away..
The tuner is a great guy, comes from a far eastern 'school' of race tuning, he road tunes for long hours (took him more than 15hours to finish mine) and i know he's used the very right methods and softwares to get a very fine no-knock ultimate power result..
Wael






