426whp/445wtq on stock IX turbo
Reason i said BUSCHURS dyno is because its to me a benchmark dyno that people can compare more easily on it. every dyno dynamics reads differently. Great numbers but i still think they are inflated (even more than ususal)
So to compare, here is a Dyno from another EVO that has dynoed at Swift Motorsports-
EVO IX- Jester M1 Flash, Turbo XS Catback, Boost Pill Removed
Honestly though I think a 1.2 Correction factor is a little too generous and a 1.12 or 1.13 seems more reasonable to me in converting DD dyno numbers to Dyno Jet. That still puts this IX at 395-400whp
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
I think everybody is getting confused. Swift Motorsports uses a DD dyno that uses a correction factor to make it read numbers like a Dyno Jet. Many shops these days that use a DD dyno do this, the fact that you made 329whp on a DD dyno with your mods shows that your shop already uses a correction factor and you can not simply add another 20% correction on top of that. A real DD dyno like the one Vishnu use to use would put your horsepower at 275 to 290whp. So basically what I am saying is that if you took your EVO to swift motorsports you would put out basically the same horsepower or maybe a little more than what you already dynoed at, but your not gonna see 394whp.
So to compare, here is a Dyno from another EVO that has dynoed at Swift Motorsports-
EVO IX- Jester M1 Flash, Turbo XS Catback, Boost Pill Removed

Honestly though I think a 1.2 Correction factor is a little too generous and a 1.12 or 1.13 seems more reasonable to me in converting DD dyno numbers to Dyno Jet. That still puts this IX at 395-400whp
So to compare, here is a Dyno from another EVO that has dynoed at Swift Motorsports-
EVO IX- Jester M1 Flash, Turbo XS Catback, Boost Pill Removed
Honestly though I think a 1.2 Correction factor is a little too generous and a 1.12 or 1.13 seems more reasonable to me in converting DD dyno numbers to Dyno Jet. That still puts this IX at 395-400whp
Thank you. We usually use a 1.13 CF on our dyno, but 'The Shop' uses a 1.20, so we have been using that as well when dynoing Evo's and STI's up here for comparison's sake.
I'm going to put my stock dyno, MAFT Pro dyno and this last one all on the same graph with the same CF to show the gains from stock.
Actually, for all you guys curious as to how to do the speed density conversion, get the maft pro system that TTP sells.
Its a piggy back that you can convert your stock ecu to speed density.
Its really not that hard. . .
Its a piggy back that you can convert your stock ecu to speed density.
Its really not that hard. . .
What you say is true, but this is not the case with his car, this is 100% stock ecu no piggybacks needed, and that is what is trying be accomplished. Only his rom and a couple of other roms support this so far, but hopefully someone with the skill will port the patch over to other roms.
What you say is true, but this is not the case with his car, this is 100% stock ecu no piggybacks needed, and that is what is trying be accomplished. Only his rom and a couple of other roms support this so far, but hopefully someone with the skill will port the patch over to other roms.
Nice results BTW.
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
For those that wanted to see previous dyno charts of the car, here you go. The lowest graph is what the car made completely stock. The middle graph was all my mods with the Maft Pro and a 3" GM MAF in blowthrough mode. The highest graph is from yesterday. All graphs are set with a 1.13CF.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






