Well heres mine. Notice my top end compared to yours...You appear to hold power better up top, but mine seems to spool sooner.

 

I wonder if it has something to do with MIVEC or our cam difference.

 

I did. I think it is just a difference in cams and tuning. I could be wrong.

Also what are the other factors like CF, temperature things like that?

Looks like Juniors tune just has less of a smoothing on it but it looks solid from the power and torque.

Mitch Mckee

 

nice numbers

 

the graph are on different scale...thats that...and the car drives smoother than before. Remember that i had 272 and now i have S1. to me there were night and day diferrence when driving the car.

 

i believe the CF we used was 1.1 this was done on 93oct 24psi tapering to 20 by redline

 

just my thought!!

 

Awsome numbers mate! this is actually the first graph i see that keeps power all the way to 7500rpm!!! Thats excellent for a green turbo!!! I guess Jr used his "magic" mivec formula!!!

 

^^^ it's an VIII... nice numbers for a full bolt-on, cammed Green on pump gas

 

Lol, now your cam lumps like mine Sam Congrats.

 

Graph looks real good but I didn't expect you to lose 25-50lb torque below 4000rpms. It must pull pretty hard past that though. Comparison runs for fun?

 

that explains the loss in torque @ 4k.

i experienced the same thing when playing with hks cams & the gsc s1's. i loss 4k punch/torque, but gained linear power & great drivability.

i illustrated the same thing in my cam compare post i made a while back
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=298419

 

still no ones tell me what gas was this evo on ? we have DD dyno in our shop and i can tell you that that number is pretty high if he was on pump gas. Or maybe our new DD dyno software read lower. Stock evo 9 put 194whp on our dyno. stock evo 8 put 183 on ours.

 

my 2003 evo 8 stock dynod at 225whp

 

look at post #21. and it was done on Dyno Dynamics.