Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

spoolup comparison, 35r, 30r 3076, 50trim, green, evo9, evo8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #31  
prostcj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Carlock, IL
Sorry, still confused. Are you sure you are not mixing up the OEM 8 turbo and the 35R?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #32  
prostcj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Carlock, IL
Originally Posted by KevinD
yeah, uhh, the 35r is the one way to the right. sorry if the colors of the plots aren't that great. matlab does a terrible job of making jpg from figures.


35r with log manifold = full boost at 4800 rpm. stock = 3500.
Ok, I thought I was losing my mind there for a second.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #33  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by sEvoIXnTurboS2k

Ok...let me break this down for you:

1. Although the OEM IX turbo may have hit maximum PSI (full spool) sooner than the 35R, the 35R still spooled quicker as evidence by the dyno graph. The 35R was making ~21psi @ 3350 whereas the OEM IX turbo was making ~21psi @ 3400.
2. The 35R only gained ~2psi between 3350 and 4800, and in my books that is pretty darn close to be fully spooled.
I think you're confused about the 35 graph. It's not making 21 psi until what looks like about 4800 rpm. I NOT SURE you'd ever get a 35R to hit 21 psi in 3rd gear on a 2.0 4G63.

Last edited by robertrinaustin; Nov 11, 2007 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #34  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by KevinD
yeah, uhh, the 35r is the one way to the right. sorry if the colors of the plots aren't that great. matlab does a terrible job of making jpg from figures.


35r with log manifold = full boost at 4800 rpm. stock = 3500.

the 35r has like 1 psi at 3500 rpm...
Oh snap! Forget all that I have said about it spooling quicker.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #35  
k2boarder3187's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: CT
great graph, ive always wanted to see this thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #36  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Color blind FTL.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #37  
xiaoni420's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
From: PottsVegas, PA
Excellent thread Kevin
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #38  
KevinD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by robertrinaustin
I think you're confused about the 35 graph. It's not making 21 psi until what looks like about 4800 rpm. I NOT SURE you'd ever get a 35R to hit 21 psi in 3rd gear on a 2.0 4G63.
your not sure a 35r would ever hit 21psi in 3rd gear on a 2.0L 4g63? i'm not sure if i read that right or not.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #39  
L80Killa87's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Lansing KS
Wow great info! THis SHOULD prevent some posts asking for this haha.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #40  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Nice Graph!! make this a sticky

people just need to remember that this graph is to give an idea on boost vs. rpm for various turbos for the evo.

this is not sacred & everyone else will expereince different results.....it's just a basic comparison.

Last edited by Aby@MIL.SPEC; Nov 11, 2007 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:58 PM
  #41  
0100's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: New England
good info, thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #42  
1mad evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by KevinD
your not sure a 35r would ever hit 21psi in 3rd gear on a 2.0L 4g63? i'm not sure if i read that right or not.
yeh me either, what you mean by that? iv seen many 35r's boosting way past 30 psi on 2 litre blocks
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 01:10 AM
  #43  
riceball777's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
good info
i would love to see this test done with a full race t3 twinscroll 35r and 3076r
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 04:04 AM
  #44  
RIPWRX's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Top post, this is the kind of info I expect from the US. Well done once again ... helped me make my choice ...
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 04:39 AM
  #45  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
I wonder if we were to try to extrapolate to higher boost levels... how much RPM you think it takes a 35R to make 6 psi more?

BTW nice comparison to the OP.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM.