Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Why AMS recommends Race balance shafts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #1  
Santiago@AMS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago, IL
Why AMS recommends Race balance shafts

Why AMS recommends Race balance shafts

In our experience using a stub shaft when removing balance shafts can increase the chances of oil pump failures. This can be caused by the lack of support provided by the rear bearing on the original balance shaft. The support is needed to prevent the oil pump gears from pushing apart and wearing into the aluminum pump housing. Once the process begins the gears can continue and wear enough to cause them to seize. During this whole process the aluminum that is being worn away can enter the clean oil stream and contaminate engine bearings and other components causing them to wear prematurely.

To help prevent this process we have come up with a way to support the oil pump gears and still remove the rotating mass. We start with a stock balance shaft then, spin it in a lathe to make sure there is no radial run out. This ensures that the shaft will spin true in the bore and not cause premature bearing wear. We then machine the weights and extra material off in a precision lathe and re measure run out to verify nothing changed during the machining process. All parts get cleaned thoroughly and are ready for installation. In the pictures below you will see the differences in the three shafts available. There are also substantial weight differences in the three shafts as seen below.



http://www.amsperformance.com/store/...oducts_id=1550
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #2  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
How many oil pump failures has AMS seen over the years with engines running the stubby shaft?

Does Buschur use the stubby shaft?

I always have to get Buschur involved lol just because they are the most trusted builder on EvoM.

Dave B, sorry to drag you into something again. But let me ask you, how many oil pump failures do you see on your motors using the stubby shaft?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
sabastian458's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
That is why I am running the AMS shaft!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #4  
GTVEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
From: Ozark, MO
The more support you have the better, once again AMS proving why they are the best at what they do.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:51 AM
  #5  
Wicked E's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by crcain

Does Buschur use the stubby shaft?

I always have to get Buschur involved lol just because they are the most trusted builder on EvoM.

Dave B, sorry to drag you into something again. But let me ask you, how many oil pump failures do you see on your motors using the stubby shaft?
Great way to start a pissing match again...

Great job on AMS's part for innovation...
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #6  
Driven Innovations's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Great job on AMS's part for innovation...
This innovation has been used many many years ago!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #7  
zbomb's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Originally Posted by crcain
How many oil pump failures has AMS seen over the years with engines running the stubby shaft?

Does Buschur use the stubby shaft?

I always have to get Buschur involved lol just because they are the most trusted builder on EvoM.

Dave B, sorry to drag you into something again. But let me ask you, how many oil pump failures do you see on your motors using the stubby shaft?
That's about the most half a$$ed apology I've seen in a while. This is AMS' thread man.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #8  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Take it easy fellas!

FWIW, I've had an oil pump failure. I was using the stubby shaft. I personally don't believe the failure was caused by the stubby shaft, but it is hard to say.

The point is, my response in this thread was not academic. I'm truly interested in inciting an intelligent debate. If AMS and Buschur can't debate the merits of a particular engine mod without it getting ugly, that is not my problem, and personally I think they can.

I'm sure if you guys had it your way we'd all just post, "AMS FTW!"
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #9  
Wicked E's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by crcain

The point is, my response in this thread was not academic. I'm truly interested in inciting an intelligent debate. If AMS and Buschur can't debate the merits of a particular engine mod without it getting ugly, that is not my problem, and personally I think they can.
You and I both know it is NOT about them debating the merits of this product amongst themselves. It gets ugly BECAUSE of the band-wagoners having to throw in their 2 cents into the debate... For that, it's a FAIL!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #10  
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 1
From: D
Originally Posted by crcain
Take it easy fellas!

FWIW, I've had an oil pump failure. I was using the stubby shaft. I personally don't believe the failure was caused by the stubby shaft, but it is hard to say.

The point is, my response in this thread was not academic. I'm truly interested in inciting an intelligent debate. If AMS and Buschur can't debate the merits of a particular engine mod without it getting ugly, that is not my problem, and personally I think they can.

I'm sure if you guys had it your way we'd all just post, "AMS FTW!"
Totally unbiased myself as i have the stock shaft, but I also would like to know if there have been many failures with the stubby.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #11  
SlowSportSedan's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Florida
how high can a fully built motor rev with the stock? and how much higher with this race balance shaft?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #12  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
The balance shafts have little to nothing to do with how high the engine can rev.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #13  
Tim@AMSperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by crcain
Take it easy fellas!

FWIW, I've had an oil pump failure. I was using the stubby shaft. I personally don't believe the failure was caused by the stubby shaft, but it is hard to say.

The point is, my response in this thread was not academic. I'm truly interested in inciting an intelligent debate. If AMS and Buschur can't debate the merits of a particular engine mod without it getting ugly, that is not my problem, and personally I think they can.

I'm sure if you guys had it your way we'd all just post, "AMS FTW!"
I dont think that this thread is here to be debated. This is simply a part that is being used by a specific company who has seen improved results due to its use. There is nothing to debate here it is just knowledge that is released to try to help the Evo community
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #14  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
You got to love people who want to stifle a debate.

God forbid some information actually gets out there that helps enthusiasts building their own motors decide which way to go.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #15  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by crcain
You got to love people who want to stifle a debate.

God forbid some information actually gets out there that helps enthusiasts building their own motors decide which way to go.

Just to clear some things up.

1. We have been using this Race balance shaft in our motors for over three years now and we felt it was another finer point to our engines that needed to be made public. Anyone that has bought an AMS motor in the past three years can attest to this option that is now standard on all EVO engines

2. Buschur builds a good motor, so does AMS. I think almost everyone can agree that they are on a level playing field and that there is no debate needed on who is better. Our track record might not go back as many years as buschur but our components, quality, service and level of achievements are as Just as high.

3. This post was not just meant to highlight another finer aspect to our engines but also to inform the EVO Community on something they should always consider when building an engine.

4. The race shaft is healthier for the oil pump, this is not an opinion but rather factual information.

I hope that can put to bed any proposed Argument before it happens. If anyone else has any questions feel free to ask away.

To those that were attempting to keep the post on track...thank you

Eric
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM.