Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

BR3065 Dyno #s, photos, videos...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #46  
JuniorAWD's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by crcain
What dyno gives 180 whp for an EVO?

That is some wierd ****. First The Shop sets up their DD to read like a DynoJet... when they should have set it up to read like a friggen DD which everyone knows read WAY LOWER than both Mustang and Dynojet. Now it reads way lower than a normal DD. Jeez you buy a 100k piece of equipment why don't you read the instructions.
Kouzman asked for his numbers with no correction. A stock evo with no correction makes less than 200whp.. The only current example I can give was the stock 08 sti that made under 190whp with no correction. I will look up stock evo file and use Kouzmans correction factor on it.. Once again I use the 100k piece of equipment to tune cars, not hope and dream of dyno numbers..

Originally Posted by crcain
Man if my tuner said that I would be .... then out the door.
What exactly does your car run again??? All I seem to find you posting about is how everything in the US sucks and how much better everything over seas is... You seem to bash everything anyone ever post..

I might also add, that your fear of "lag" is probably why your **** is slow..

Originally Posted by schred86
very nice setup indeed, im ordering mine soon too. #'s do seem a lil ow b/c on the same exact dyno at the shop with a dynoflash tune i made 317 with a turboback, f/p, mbc, intake. but hey, numbers are just numbers. enjoy it


Originally Posted by schred86
if i remember it was 1.12 or 1.15, i looked to see if i had a dyno sheet but i dont

heres my current setup dyno sheet from ics with the mods in my sig.

What did it trap?? From what I have seen the old correction of choice was 1.20.. which reads like a "dyno jet" If you PM me your last 6 digits of the vin I can verify it...

Junior
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 06:57 AM
  #47  
schred86's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
i duno what it trapped b/c i havent gone to the track with this setup. sry for the thread jack
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #48  
Jrod@Buschur's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 1
From: York, PA
My car put down 396whp/304trq on 94 octane and 22-23psi and on C16 and 29psi it made 502whp / 403trq. Best ET was 10.83 best MPH was 133.

I'll dig up my dyno sheets this weekend on my laptop and post them for you guys to compare unless you look up some of my old threads they should be in there.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #49  
Clutchdc5's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 1
From: at the 5-10 no limit tables
If I made 300 or below. I would think somthing is wrong. But at 300whp doing 12.1 at 114. That's hella impressive. Your mid 11's for sure. Congrats I just hope my gt35r can get me in low 11's on pump
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #50  
kouzman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Clutchdc5
If I made 300 or below. I would think somthing is wrong. But at 300whp doing 12.1 at 114. That's hella impressive. Your mid 11's for sure. Congrats I just hope my gt35r can get me in low 11's on pump
My point exactly...
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #51  
JuniorAWD's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: NJ

That is with 1.00
As I said.. A stock 2005 EVO 8 makes around 180whp at this correction.. and around 185ftlbs... Kouzman makes 352 and 300 with this correction factor. Its the standard dynodynamics base correction...



With this correction (dyno jet) the Stock car makes 225whp and around 235tq
Kouzman makes 422whp and 360tq

Hope this clears things up

Last edited by JuniorAWD; Mar 14, 2008 at 03:19 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #52  
H.Redman's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: OHIO
Nice Setup
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #53  
Freddy302's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: CT
AWESOME SET UP! congrats on the #'s and a hell of a fast street car. It looks really mean under the hood!

Hopefully you can hit the track soon with the weather staying nice and cool!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 08:49 AM
  #54  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
What is heat wrapped and zip tied to your front strut brace?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #55  
kouzman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
thanks freddy! Congrats for your car too! Jimmy and junior told me your plans! Wish you all the best and I a pretty sure you will achieve your targets!

The heat wrapped tie wrapped thing is the harness of the sun hyper ignition module... I dont believe that it was mandatory but I did it anyway. Will do the same with the vacuum hoses when I install my ebc...
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 09:09 AM
  #56  
schred86's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
are u happy with this turbo? i cant make up my mind on this, spend the extra 400 for the hta? whats ur thoughts...wish i could meet up with u and give me a ride in that beast!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #57  
Freddy302's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: CT
Originally Posted by kouzman
thanks freddy! Congrats for your car too! Jimmy and junior told me your plans! Wish you all the best and I a pretty sure you will achieve your targets!

The heat wrapped tie wrapped thing is the harness of the sun hyper ignition module... I dont believe that it was mandatory but I did it anyway. Will do the same with the vacuum hoses when I install my ebc...

Thanks!! Hopefully we can make a group trip to the track soon it would be a blast...
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 07:46 AM
  #58  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
I like that dejon intake...
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #59  
Bonestock!'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: Panama City, FL
Originally Posted by urslo4n8
Thats what i was thinking, some guys with the stock turbo are hitting those numbers

I do! 350whp/308TQ on pump and 21psi. This was on Stage6's Dyno Dynamics in Jacksonville.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 10:39 AM
  #60  
tony gibson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Originally Posted by kouzman
Well I am not that of a rookie mate... As I said numerous times the car with 300whp had 12.1@114.2 with 3500 lbs weight... Now with 50whp more and better clutch and tranny the car should be faster...

Now to those who still dont understand numbers ...well I did the 12.1 with 300whp and 3500 lbs so I am by far the best driver in the universe.... Lmao... Ohhh and that was with 1.73 60ft... Imagine better....

No bull now... I would expect the car to run in the 11s now...
Was there a bit of sarcasm in being the best driver in the world lol? I went 11.9@114 with a 1.75 60ft . My whole take on this is screw the numbers...lets see what this baby traps!! I get sick of seeing **** about dyno numbers. I believe in track numbers only.,..now for tuning thats a different story. But even dyno tuning sometimes needs to be changed when the car is put to the street. I am happy with just using the AEM destop dyno and trap speeds to see where my money is going.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:25 AM.