Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Drop in pistons, to do or not to do “that’s the question”??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #46  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I am only here because I was sent a PM and asked to come.

If you have an EVO and want to make 500+ whp reliably or run over 8,000 rpm reliably you are going to need to to upgrade the pistons/rods.

The best way to do this of course would be to also build the cylinder head and have it properly ported. Pull the engine and build it too. We are one of the lowest price shops for doing this. Parts, labor and new short block will cost you $5600 if all that is done is the shortblock, parts and labor. Add another $1600 for our Stage 3 head.

Now, if your EVO has fairly low mileage we have done I-don't-know-how-many drop in piston builds. We were the first to offer this for the EVO's and we have pistons that are specifically machined to drop in the stock bores of the EVO's. If you did this job with us the parts/labor would run you about $2500. I have a high end professional hone from Mac. I've had it for 10+ years. It is not a simply ball hone or a spring type hone like TTP showed (not knocking anyone's hone). The hone we use will actually straighten out a cylinder bore. The problem is if the cylinder bore is that bad the engine needs to come out. I bore gauge the cylinders when we do drop in pistons and make sure that the build will be within spec. I've done drop in pistons up to 70,000 miles, that is the highest mileage car I've ever done it on. That car is still running strong at 550 whp and has been done for over 2 years.

In my opinion the only down side to the drop in pistons is still having the balance shafts in the engine, that's it.
David, interestingly we always use your pistons which work great every time! Btw it should be noted that Dan @ Pruven has a tool which he uses to do the balance shaft removal with the engine in the car. We did it many times although its a tight squeeze.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #47  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
David, interestingly we always use your pistons which work great every time! Btw it should be noted that Dan @ Pruven has a tool which he uses to do the balance shaft removal with the engine in the car. We did it many times although its a tight squeeze.
Is it called a 19mm ratchet?

That is what is needed to remove the front engine motor mount so the motor can be dropped down low enough to remove the frontcase and access the bshafts.

I used this method on my personal Galant VR4 years ago. Definately not a fun job, but doable.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #48  
JordanS4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax
I am in the same predicament as you. Get the car running now or wait a few months and do it right.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #49  
Invoice EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: Elizabethtown, KY
I'm runnning Buschurs drop in pistons and rods also.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 08:22 PM
  #50  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Is it called a 19mm ratchet?

That is what is needed to remove the front engine motor mount so the motor can be dropped down low enough to remove the frontcase and access the bshafts.

I used this method on my personal Galant VR4 years ago. Definately not a fun job, but doable.
I was referring to the fixture he utilizes to knock out the balance shaft bearings and re-insert them with the crank in place.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #51  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
You need to remove them to get the cylinder hone far enough in the cylinder to get the whole cylinder without hitting them with the hone.
I understand removing them to hone but why replace? Do they go bad, are they not reusable once removed? I am not being sarcastic i am genuinely interested.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 06:15 AM
  #52  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Actually I disagree on having to take the oil jets out. The type of hone that TTP is using would hit them and could bend them, I can see taking them out for that reason. The hone I have has a smooth plate on the bottom and can be run right down on top of the jet and it won't effect it. Also if you look the rings do not ride that far down in the cylinder so honing it that far down for a good ring seal isn't needed.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #53  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by MR Turco
I understand removing them to hone but why replace? Do they go bad, are they not reusable once removed? I am not being sarcastic i am genuinely interested.
R/R as in remove/replace the existing ones.

DB has a point though, but I like having the same finish on the whole cylinder.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #54  
1badgsex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: bucks county, pa/philly
AL, TTP, and DB very good info here makes me think hmm.. should i do pistons????
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 05:27 AM
  #55  
apagan01's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (299)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 5
From: digging for oil
Originally Posted by Phenix_fyah
Good information here.
Agreed
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 05:36 AM
  #56  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
i did drop in wiseco pistons, eagle rods and clevite bearing and everything is good 1000 miles in. about to do the 3rd oil change and going to full synthetic. made 504whp with it so far.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 08:08 AM
  #57  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Here are some various pics again in case someone missed them.

Originally Posted by TTP Engineering




















Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #58  
Liqquid's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 4
From: Sag-Nasty, MI
Some good info in here, thanks for clearing up the balance shaft thing as well, was not sure if it would work at all leaving that in.
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #59  
joedr's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Very good information here!

I removed the head to do a drop in of pistons and found this! I am glad I did!
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #60  
HeadGames's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: EWING,NEW JERSEY
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
If you have an EVO and want to make 500+ whp reliably or run over 8,000 rpm reliably you are going to need to to upgrade the pistons/rods.


Now, if your EVO has fairly low mileage we have done I-don't-know-how-many drop in piston builds. I have a high end professional hone from Mac. I've had it for 10+ years. It is not a simply ball hone or a spring type hone like TTP showed (not knocking anyone's hone). The hone we use will actually straighten out a cylinder bore. The problem is if the cylinder bore is that bad the engine needs to come out. I bore gauge the cylinders when we do drop in pistons and make sure that the build will be within spec. I've done drop in pistons up to 70,000 miles, that is the highest mileage car I've ever done it on. That car is still running strong at 550 whp and has been done for over 2 years.

In my opinion the only down side to the drop in pistons is still having the balance shafts in the engine, that's it.
in my opinion of everyone whom has posted, if your doing a drop in piston, David is the only one to do it where your actually going to catch an issue before it becomes one...the key word is a dial bore gauge. I appologize for my ignorance, as I wouldn't use Plasti-guage on my lawn mower, and have no experience with it because if memory serves me right, I think it is only accurate to within a half thousandths? if that? where a dial bore guage is accurate within a tenth of a thousandths. And it can be used to see if the cylinder is out of round, something plasti-guage cannot do.. I also think it's those of us that have actually machined a block in a hone, and used said dial bore guage that cringe at the thought of doing it otherwise. You don't have the experience of seeing putting to much pressure on the stones and seeing how much material it can take away, and then you lose your piston to wall clearance. Or, even worse is the customer who uses the ball hone, and makes the cylinder wall hour glass shaped(that is what a ball hone will do, just follows the shape of whatever your using it on)
So, we could assume everything is right, but without the right tools your truely guessing and asking the customer to do so as well.

In my opinion, it should also be understood, that checking the static compression is not always a good indiactor of how a engine is sealing. You need to perform a leakdown to really guage that.

I guess we cannot argue with the success of the drop-in piston performances from everyone who has chimmed in..but everyone agreed it is not the right way to do it, just the most short term economical way. But, I guess sometimes it's not what's right, it's what is. Sure it will run, and make power..but I personally would never tell my customer it is a good idea, nor would I do it myself and be able to sleep at night without using my $2500 dial bore guage...but I am also a perfectionist and do everything in that manner.

One good thing about it is, if it going to be off, it's most likely going to be big..and there is a saying in engine building, " too loose you know it...too tight everyone knows it! "
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:55 PM.