Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Gt3065 on Stage IV IX - 2.0 L vs 2.3 L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #16  
dbsears's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by crcain
You know I sort of thought... probably mistakenly seeing your post now... that the GT30 and GT35 turbos shared the same turbine housing and just had different compressors. I guess I was wrong.

After seeing results like this, I wonder where are all the people who answer 2.0 liter in polls are?

It's always been true I thought that there was no change in peak power but more torque and earlier spool.
Well I would rather have a 2.3 myself but the 2.0 is far superior for drag racing. There is a reason why all the highest hp evos and fastest evos are 2.0l
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #17  
superscout03's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
First off For DYNOFLASH (AL) I am a repeat customer of his and all of his tunes have far exceeded my expectations.
Second up is ICS PERFORMANCE George and his team, I have had a great time up here in CT, and I would like to thank them all for a great job, Andre for being extremely careful during the build, he treated my car as I would "not one leak" not one scratch.
I am very impressed with the build on my Evo. Having the 2.3 now really changed the whole feel of the car, the 2.3 increased performance in non boost even with the larger turbo I am still able to easly pass other cars while in vacuum. The spool is incredible now, if it was any faster it would almost feel like a stock turbo. The balance shaft removal added no extra vibration to the car. The torque improvement over the 2.0 was alot more than we expected. The Evo runs smoother than a singer sewing machine. I will be posting pics of the entire build shortly along with dyno video.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #18  
superscout03's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by dbsears87
Well I would rather have a 2.3 myself but the 2.0 is far superior for drag racing. There is a reason why all the highest hp evos and fastest evos are 2.0l
as I recall the highest hp Evo is a 2.3
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #19  
JordanS4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax
Originally Posted by superscout03
as I recall the highest hp Evo is a 2.3
i believe you are quite mistaken
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #20  
dbsears's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by superscout03
as I recall the highest hp Evo is a 2.3
Actually its not. 2.0L is still the highest and will be even higher in a couple days.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 06:48 PM
  #21  
lucky13evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: BayArea
makes me wish i had the scrill to have do a 2.3
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #22  
Indy Evo's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 0
From: Nitro Alley, IN
Superscout that is outstanding, just another reason to do the 2.3 that U2SLO has been bugging me about. Another great tuning job by Al. I hope to get up there soon and see you guys. Good Luck with the project.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DynoFlash
For Sale - Cars For Sale
34
May 22, 2012 03:38 PM
DynoFlash
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
7
Jan 6, 2010 09:27 AM
DynoFlash
Drag Racing
16
Jul 18, 2009 07:38 AM
DynoFlash
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
136
Oct 12, 2008 02:47 PM
DynoFlash
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
171
Sep 1, 2007 03:16 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:25 PM.