Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

AEM and Knock - eg: Paul Nelson Datalog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #16  
crcain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Evil, what don't you like about det cans?
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #17  
evil_eagle's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Nampa ID
Originally Posted by crcain
Evil, what don't you like about det cans?

On a car like mine det cans are pointless, too many things going on in just 8-9 seconds while on the track. The car is violent enough as it is,(noise wise from the side exit, wind, loud dogbox ect) so I doubt I would be paying much attention to det cans going down the track at full kill.

I've gotten my tunes down consistently enough that I feel safe with running the car on a base tune & nothing will go wrong. I have yet to spit a rod out of the block or kill a spark plug or a piston. (knock on wood )

Det cans are nice on the more lower hp street cars, cause you have time to pay attention to what your listening for.
Also good tuners that tune on dynos can see detonation on the dyno graph. If you know what you are listening for and know all the basics of what a motor likes/dislikes then det cans are not needed.
Detonation really can't be felt in the car unless it's ungodly amount of detonation. Detonation has a pretty distinctive sound to it, basically if your at WOT and hear something and have to ask yourself "what the hell was that? is that an exhaust leak?" then chances are it's detonation. It sounds like marbles in a glass jar, you can't miss it.

On street cars I would never take the knock sensor out of the car, too many variables from day to day and gas fill ups. Knock control becomes your best friend with a street car that is daily driven.

Last edited by evil_eagle; May 6, 2008 at 11:46 PM.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 07:04 AM
  #18  
crcain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Thanks for talking with me Evil I know you have a ton of experience so it's real nice that you take the time. The guy that tunes my car swears by det cans which he makes. It's a pair of ear defenders, rubber hose leading to about a 8" copper pipe bolted to the cylinder head. He has tuned Skyline in the 8's, cosworth motors to 200+ mph. As I said he swears by det cans.

It seems to me, when things are moving very, very fast, what can someone react to the quickest? Having all sounds removed (ear defenders) and then just waiting for a "tik" is very easy to do. Viewing a live datalog under hard g's is pointless I'm sure unless on a dyno.

In terms of reading plugs after each pass, would that not be tricky because once you get a bit of det and you don't lift... isn't it possible for it to all go south quickly because the bit of det causes more det?

If you could give the AEM active knock control a grade, 0-10, 10 being excellent knock control with very few false positives, what would you give it?

I keep waiting for Autronic to come up with knock control for the situation of bad gas or what not. I've tried knock block and not had much success.

Could you log raw knock sensor voltage and just simply have the ECU react if it hits above a certain threshold? Or must you have something like people have described here with the AEM, the record a baseline type of thing.

Finally, have you tried any other types of knock sensors like bosch, etc?

Originally Posted by evil_eagle
On a car like mine det cans are pointless, too many things going on in just 8-9 seconds while on the track. The car is violent enough as it is,(noise wise from the side exit, wind, loud dogbox ect) so I doubt I would be paying much attention to det cans going down the track at full kill.

I've gotten my tunes down consistently enough that I feel safe with running the car on a base tune & nothing will go wrong. I have yet to spit a rod out of the block or kill a spark plug or a piston. (knock on wood )

Det cans are nice on the more lower hp street cars, cause you have time to pay attention to what your listening for.
Also good tuners that tune on dynos can see detonation on the dyno graph. If you know what you are listening for and know all the basics of what a motor likes/dislikes then det cans are not needed.
Detonation really can't be felt in the car unless it's ungodly amount of detonation. Detonation has a pretty distinctive sound to it, basically if your at WOT and hear something and have to ask yourself "what the hell was that? is that an exhaust leak?" then chances are it's detonation. It sounds like marbles in a glass jar, you can't miss it.

On street cars I would never take the knock sensor out of the car, too many variables from day to day and gas fill ups. Knock control becomes your best friend with a street car that is daily driven.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 07:16 AM
  #19  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Originally Posted by evil_eagle
On a car like mine det cans are pointless, too many things going on in just 8-9 seconds while on the track. The car is violent enough as it is,(noise wise from the side exit, wind, loud dogbox ect) so I doubt I would be paying much attention to det cans going down the track at full kill.

I've gotten my tunes down consistently enough that I feel safe with running the car on a base tune & nothing will go wrong. I have yet to spit a rod out of the block or kill a spark plug or a piston. (knock on wood )

Det cans are nice on the more lower hp street cars, cause you have time to pay attention to what your listening for.
Also good tuners that tune on dynos can see detonation on the dyno graph. If you know what you are listening for and know all the basics of what a motor likes/dislikes then det cans are not needed.
Detonation really can't be felt in the car unless it's ungodly amount of detonation. Detonation has a pretty distinctive sound to it, basically if your at WOT and hear something and have to ask yourself "what the hell was that? is that an exhaust leak?" then chances are it's detonation. It sounds like marbles in a glass jar, you can't miss it.

On street cars I would never take the knock sensor out of the car, too many variables from day to day and gas fill ups. Knock control becomes your best friend with a street car that is daily driven.
You sir are correct! Good Post.



Knock sensors are double edged swords just like those who live off the AFR data from a Wideband.
Live on the edge with a knock sensor and you will die by it as well.

Reading the actual components involved with the combustion process is the only true way to know what is going on. One dyno pull at a time tells you very little. Back to back to back.... runs in various gears and in steady state will tell you more. BUT when you are logging runs at the track (drag or road course) THEN checking plugs immediately, will tell you everything.

Knock voltage will tell you NOTHING. Knock RAW on the AEM is what should be logged and scrutinized. BUT even then, a tuner with enough experience will know if he or she is going in the right direction.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 08:55 AM
  #20  
tabio42's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
I think det cans are useful for dyno tuning but I agree that running 9 sec 1/4 mi's they probably wouldn't be the best thing
Some people (like my brother) have a really good ear for hearing the slightest bits of unsustained knock without cans. I have no idea how. Maybe my ears don't pick up that frequency.

Correct me if I'm wrong but when you're logging Engine Speed, Knock Raw, and O2 together, you have a much better chance of determining if you have real knock right? Because you can see if there is a dip in the RPM's or a lean spike in the AFR's?
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 09:11 AM
  #21  
crcain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by tabio42
I think det cans are useful for dyno tuning but I agree that running 9 sec 1/4 mi's they probably wouldn't be the best thing
Some people (like my brother) have a really good ear for hearing the slightest bits of unsustained knock without cans. I have no idea how. Maybe my ears don't pick up that frequency.

Correct me if I'm wrong but when you're logging Engine Speed, Knock Raw, and O2 together, you have a much better chance of determining if you have real knock right? Because you can see if there is a dip in the RPM's or a lean spike in the AFR's?
I'd like to put this rumour to bed.

Can it be agreed that even with the most trained ear... if you are audibly hearing knock with your naked ear then you are letting the car det too much?
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #22  
Lucas English's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 10
From: Camas, WA
Well for me every time I see knock on the sensor and pull timing to fix it I never could here it with my ear. I think with external dumps and loud exhaust if you can here noise its a ton.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #23  
evil_eagle's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Nampa ID
Originally Posted by crcain
Thanks for talking with me Evil I know you have a ton of experience so it's real nice that you take the time. The guy that tunes my car swears by det cans which he makes. It's a pair of ear defenders, rubber hose leading to about a 8" copper pipe bolted to the cylinder head. He has tuned Skyline in the 8's, cosworth motors to 200+ mph. As I said he swears by det cans.

It seems to me, when things are moving very, very fast, what can someone react to the quickest? Having all sounds removed (ear defenders) and then just waiting for a "tik" is very easy to do. Viewing a live datalog under hard g's is pointless I'm sure unless on a dyno.

Thats the thing about racing a serious car at a level like this, it's a gamble you take, most cars at this power level like mine are always going have a bit of knock, it's part of it's nature, the key is to keep that knock under control where your not scattering parts all over the track

In terms of reading plugs after each pass, would that not be tricky because once you get a bit of det and you don't lift... isn't it possible for it to all go south quickly because the bit of det causes more det?

Reading plugs comes with experience years after years, after awhile you know exactly what to look for, it's not something that everyone can do without knowing what to look for, but once you know what to look for then you can tune a car on edge by just reading plugs

If you could give the AEM active knock control a grade, 0-10, 10 being excellent knock control with very few false positives, what would you give it?

It depends really, some cars the knock sensor works wonders and will save your ***, I would say with cars over 700whp the knock sensor becomes like a problem child and tatal tells false information, on a 400-500whp car I swear by the knock control as it's very useful, but when you get a car with extremely loose tolerance's the knock sensor gets a bit jumpy as the motor is much noisier then just your everyday street car

I keep waiting for Autronic to come up with knock control for the situation of bad gas or what not. I've tried knock block and not had much success.

Could you log raw knock sensor voltage and just simply have the ECU react if it hits above a certain threshold? Or must you have something like people have described here with the AEM, the record a baseline type of thing.

The knock control on the AEM does have a threshold table that you build yourself, the baseline pulls we talked about earlier are exactly why you wanna make the base line pulls, then you draw the scale into the table and tell the ecu to pull timing/add fuel when the knock voltage goes over the drawn scale, once you feel comfortable enough with your knock table scale then you start to read the channel knock #1, knock #1 will report spikes anything over your knock scale that you drew into the table as mentioned

Finally, have you tried any other types of knock sensors like bosch, etc?
No I haven't, the best knock sensor I have used was either the 2g DSM knock sensor or the evo sensor, infact they are both the same sensor

Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #24  
evil_eagle's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Nampa ID
Originally Posted by tabio42
Correct me if I'm wrong but when you're logging Engine Speed, Knock Raw, and O2 together, you have a much better chance of determining if you have real knock right? Because you can see if there is a dip in the RPM's or a lean spike in the AFR's?

If the knock is bad enough then yes you can see it in the RPM graph on the log if you look close enough. Although you really don't get lean spikes from knock unless it starts to make the car miss fire. Knock is more dependent on timing then anything. Fuel has some to do with knock, but timing is mostly the key when dialing in a car for no knock.
Ive tuned cars as lean as 11.9-12.0 on just plain jane 93 octane pump gas without having any knock, it's mostly when you start playing around with the timing that you start to see allot of knock. Do I recommend tuning to 12.0 a/f's with pump gas, no I wouldn't but if you know what to look for then you shouldn't have a problem.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #25  
crcain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Thank you evil_eagle for all your insight!
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #26  
Jean's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 387
Likes: 1
From: Miami
I am using a Toyomoto knock sensor kit for the EVO. My data logs used to look the same with the factory Mitsubishi Knock sensor.

Now it looks flat unless there is actual knock.

I will post a few logs later.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 01:11 PM
  #27  
evil_eagle's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Nampa ID
Originally Posted by crcain
Thank you evil_eagle for all your insight!
Not a problem man, anytime.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 06:41 AM
  #28  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by DTM
You sir are correct! Good Post.



Knock sensors are double edged swords just like those who live off the AFR data from a Wideband.
Live on the edge with a knock sensor and you will die by it as well.

Reading the actual components involved with the combustion process is the only true way to know what is going on. One dyno pull at a time tells you very little. Back to back to back.... runs in various gears and in steady state will tell you more. BUT when you are logging runs at the track (drag or road course) THEN checking plugs immediately, will tell you everything.

Knock voltage will tell you NOTHING. Knock RAW on the AEM is what should be logged and scrutinized. BUT even then, a tuner with enough experience will know if he or she is going in the right direction.
I agree with you whole heartedly
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #29  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
What I am waiting for is for OEMs to start using actual pressure sensors instead of piezoecltric sensors like we have in our cars. Our sensors are 'tuned' for the resonant frequencies of our specific engine dimensions and harmonics. Once you build your engine, bore it out, etc, then the sensor no longer 'fits' the engine anymore.

With a true pressure sensor instead of a piezoelctric sensor, their will be no phantom knock or background noise that can give false readings. That's the biggest problem, in my opinion, with the current tehcnology. That's why the knock algorithms in the stock ECUs are so complex, since it has to have routines to only monitor at certain crank angles and certain frequencies that may be due to detonation. I personally think the stock Mitsu ECU does a great job at it and is one reason why I don't personally like stand alones and using knock voltage. Knock voltage, by itself, is pretty useless.

Anyway, I thought I read somewhere that Toyota actually uses pressure sensors inside the combustion chamber for this. Is that true? Does anyone know of any OEMs or aftermarket companies that have this available?


Eric
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #30  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
www.optrand.com

I briefly mentioned it in post 13...spose a link might have been nice.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 AM.