Results from Precision 6265 Turbo on Evo IX!!! 469whp on Pump!!
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
One thing that people seem to have forgotten, a Dynojet and Mustang load the car differently creating different spool up. You can't really compare the two as some of you want to do.
I don’t want to start bad mouthing this turbo but i just don’t see it being better than gt35.. I put down 508whp at 28psi e85 on stock ecu and stock evo 8 cams If i had evo 9 or q16 gas i would put the same power as this 6265 turbo. Plus i spull at 4800rpms. This turbo sounds great but i think everybody here is jumped way to fast saying that this is the gt35 killer. Someone needs to run this turbo back to back with gt35 and then you can only see what is better.
Last edited by dsm25psi; Jun 28, 2008 at 10:21 PM.
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
We have made more power on e85 . I'm not convinced q16 would make more power.so again we need to compare apples to apples. I am sure buschur will test these back to back. This turbo on 1 less psi made 25 more whp than yours. Imo for the price its worth every dollar from what I have seen. I'm not out just to sell turbos either. I believe these are worth the money and they don't have a 10 week wait.
Does your car have an .82 back housing also?? The 6262 might have closer spool to 4800 so maybe that will be the hot ticket.. Time will tell.
Does your car have an .82 back housing also?? The 6262 might have closer spool to 4800 so maybe that will be the hot ticket.. Time will tell.
I am the owner of the car and i just want to thank Mike & Cwill at AwdMotorsports for the great parts and time in getting everything right! And Of course Jestr for the sick tune!! 
There are lots of stuff we need to do like better intercooler piping, double pumper, cossi cams, and the .63 housing. But i just wanted to see what it would make and making 469 on pump and stock everything was just nuts. There were two other evo 8 with 35r, meth, and aem only making 480 to 490 so im really happy although i no its laggy which im changing the housing so im sure there will be a better powerband, and alot of streetable. Theres a alot more improvement but this turbo is the shyt. Thanks Mike, Cwill and Jestr!
There are lots of stuff we need to do like better intercooler piping, double pumper, cossi cams, and the .63 housing. But i just wanted to see what it would make and making 469 on pump and stock everything was just nuts. There were two other evo 8 with 35r, meth, and aem only making 480 to 490 so im really happy although i no its laggy which im changing the housing so im sure there will be a better powerband, and alot of streetable. Theres a alot more improvement but this turbo is the shyt. Thanks Mike, Cwill and Jestr!
We have made more power on e85 . I'm not convinced q16 would make more power.so again we need to compare apples to apples. I am sure buschur will test these back to back. This turbo on 1 less psi made 25 more whp than yours. Imo for the price its worth every dollar from what I have seen. I'm not out just to sell turbos either. I believe these are worth the money and they don't have a 10 week wait.
Does your car have an .82 back housing also?? The 6262 might have closer spool to 4800 so maybe that will be the hot ticket.. Time will tell.
Does your car have an .82 back housing also?? The 6262 might have closer spool to 4800 so maybe that will be the hot ticket.. Time will tell.
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
When exactly (from datalog) did you spool 25 psi in 3rd gear?
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1