Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

373ft-lbs / 352awhp stock turbo, 91 octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #46  
Cyloc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Area
Congrats on the numbers.....I am glad all went well with the AEM I sold you.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #47  
SEvoIX's Avatar
Newbie
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Cyloc
Congrats on the numbers.....I am glad all went well with the AEM I sold you.
Me too! Props for a good deal
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #48  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by sEvoIXnTurboS2k
Ok...not going to start a war here so I'll keep this simple.

1. Mustang dyno reads lower than a Dynojet. That's a given. It doesn't read A WHOLE lot lower though (what...5-8% or so?).
add 10% to that and you would be closer.

350 on a dynojet would probably read about 300 on a properly setup Mustang.

We've had guys that have made 400 on a dynojet, make around 355 or so on our mustang. I've also seen an Evo that made a claimed 400 on a socal DynoDynamics make 305 on a Mustang, But of course, every dyno is different so comparing dynos is probably the number one reason for the huge Evom Fog(tm).

Last edited by razorlab; Jul 4, 2008 at 04:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 04:22 PM
  #49  
1QYK9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by razorlab
add 10% to that and you would be closer.

350 on a dynojet would probably read about 300 on a properly setup Mustang.
Thanks for your input! Let's tackle this from a more specific angle. A 50hp difference between a dynojet and a Mustang dyno would probably be overcome by a difference in boost by 4psi? Agreed?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #50  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by sEvoIXnTurboS2k
Thanks for your input! Let's tackle this from a more specific angle. A 50hp difference between a dynojet and a Mustang dyno would probably be overcome by a difference in boost by 4psi? Agreed?
Now you are getting into a realm of alot more variables. 4psi more peak? 4psi more up top? Won't happen with a stock turbo. It will taper no matter what. Timing changes with that boost? Different turbo? more flow mods?

Possibilities are infinite.

The dyno is a tool, pure and simple. The more people that start to understand that, the thinner the Evom Fog will be.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #51  
1QYK9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by razorlab
Now you are getting into a realm of alot more variables. 4psi more peak? 4psi more up top? Won't happen with a stock turbo. It will taper no matter what. Timing changes with that boost? Different turbo? more flow mods?

Possibilities are infinite.

The dyno is a tool, pure and simple. The more people that start to understand that, the thinner the Evom Fog will be.
I completely understand the notion of "The dyno is a tool". I am not here to start any disputes over which dyno is better. If I was, I'd say that a dynapack is the best dyno to tune on. Anyways, it all comes down to how the car performs on the track, but even with that you have many variables (i.e., driver, track prep, elevation, etc.).

In my example, I was simply stating that, while all other variables remaining constant, a 4psi gain could make up a 50hp difference. Case in point: at 1.5psi more my Evo made 14hp more (an even more impressive 31ft-lbs more!).
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #52  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by sEvoIXnTurboS2k

In my example, I was simply stating that, while all other variables remaining constant, a 4psi gain could make up a 50hp difference.
I am simply stating that comparing two different Evos, on two different brand of Dynos, that are known to read much different, and then throwing in yet another variable of change, is recockulious, and from what I have seen over the years, is a perfect recipe for disappointment. At that point, it's just number chasing, which is not what dynos should be used for.

If I had a magic wand that could eliminate all the "My car should make this on this dyno cause it made this on this dyno, and my friends boyfriends Evo makes this on this dyno in Kansas" statements on this board, I would have used it years ago, with a big smile on my face.

Last edited by razorlab; Jul 4, 2008 at 05:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #53  
1QYK9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by razorlab
I am simply stating that comparing two different Evos, on two different brand of Dynos, that are known to read much different, and then throwing in yet another variable of change, is recockulious, and from what I have seen over the years, is a perfect recipe for disappointment. At that point, it's just number chasing, which is not what dynos should be used for.

If I had a magic wand that could eliminate all the "My car should make this on this dyno cause it made this on this dyno, and my friends boyfriends Evo makes this on this dyno in Kansas" statements on this board, I would have used it years ago, with a big smile on my face.
You are correct. Let's end this debate and keep things positive.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #54  
Evan311's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
nice numbers car must be a blast on the street
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 05:45 PM
  #55  
brokenRS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 778
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
nice, i still call shotgun when that s2k is completed
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #56  
1QYK9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by tien
nice, i still call shotgun when that s2k is completed
You assume that there will still be two seats when she is back up and running. j/k There should still be two seats.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 12:25 AM
  #57  
brokenRS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 778
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
lol
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 01:35 AM
  #58  
2ndnunn's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Texas
sweet numbers!!!!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aby@MIL.SPEC
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
16
Aug 6, 2016 10:23 AM
crimedog04
Evo X Dyno Results
6
Sep 16, 2013 01:38 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
8
Oct 25, 2012 07:13 PM
Boomba Racing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
22
Mar 1, 2011 10:31 PM
TURBODAWG
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
73
Feb 9, 2006 08:38 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:20 PM.