Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Time Attack Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #16  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
If you were building for Nurburgring then 800 WHP would be feasible, desirable, etc. . I think that for a reliable 800 you`re going to need something huge such as a 42R. But, a 42R is probably not what you`d want for Buttonwillow.

For most CA tracks I`d guess that a 35R is just about as big as you`d ever want to go. A stroker and an HTA 35R is about it. So, maybe 630-650 WHP reliably on race gas.

I`d do a Red and a 2.2 myself and settle for 550ish on racegas. To get 800 as John and Nils indicated you`ll need a too-huge turbo which would be overkill for the CA short tracks.

Last edited by sparky; Nov 26, 2008 at 07:55 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #17  
badhabit90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: central coast CA
/\okay, so your saying the 42r would be great. for a large track....perfect.
build the engine so it CAN handle the 800hp then put the 35r on it for smaller tracks..now were on to something....

so now what components would you go with..?? or would you just use a "shortblock" from one of the vendors??
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 08:58 PM
  #18  
john.schuber's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Vail, Colorado
Originally Posted by slvrr
You are just not going to have a high hp time attack motor and be reliable period. You are going to break stuff regardless and the more power your pushing the more stuff thats going to break. Best of luck with your project and you can't go wrong with any of the vendors mentioned


Really? AMS ran the same engine for two or three season, driving it a lot harder then he will ever be. Unless he's going to hire a professional race car driver as well.


AMS 2.3RR with AMS CNC Head. 800 Hp HTA86 VP Import.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #19  
dsmbruno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: US of A
I dont think you need 800whp to have a good track car. Im sure you know that. A 42R is probably only good if your running 40+psi and it takes forever to spool whether its a 2.0 or 2.3... way to laggy for road racing. I think your best bet would be an AMS 2.3rr with a twinscroll 35r. Guys at full-race believe twinscroll is the way to go, and it does make a difference in spool times. Good luck on the project...
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #20  
badhabit90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: central coast CA
Cool

Originally Posted by john.schuber
Really? AMS ran the same engine for two or three season, driving it a lot harder then he will ever be. Unless he's going to hire a professional race car driver as well.


AMS 2.3RR with AMS CNC Head. 800 Hp HTA86 VP Import.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #21  
socalmr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
i have a 2.2l cosworth crate motor, love it! but i would also consider the ams 23rr with a headgames road race head!!!
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #22  
Mautofied.IS300's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Tomei Derive Phase 2. /thread.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 11:36 PM
  #23  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
VP Import is 25 a gallon. Unless budget is no issue using that as racefuel gets expensive really fast.

The 4088 can almost get it done, some of the BW turbos, possibly some of the new stuff from Garrett. With a 42 you'll need to run about 35-38psi. That will be hard pressed to last for long continuous stretches of time, but should be feasible as a 4-5 lap motor with good cool down.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #24  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
2.2 because you get the majority of the stroke advantage of a 2.4 crank in a 2.0 block without having to worry about the geometry and RPMs that happens in such scenarios.


Scorke
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 03:41 AM
  #25  
badhabit90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: central coast CA
Originally Posted by socalmr
i have a 2.2l cosworth crate motor, love it! but i would also consider the ams 23rr with a headgames road race head!!!
that is a delicious engine sir...
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 03:42 AM
  #26  
badhabit90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: central coast CA
Cool

Originally Posted by scorke
2.2 because you get the majority of the stroke advantage of a 2.4 crank in a 2.0 block without having to worry about the geometry and RPMs that happens in such scenarios.


Scorke
fair enough...RPM may be of concern.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #27  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
I just threw out the 42R suggestion facetiously, so I apologize. I guess I never gave the "large turbo for roadrace course idea" much thought, because, as a practical matter, I just couldnt afford it. But, regardless, you have posed an interesting question.

You have gotten some good answers already from people like John Shuber, John Bradley and Nils who have a lot of experience with this sort of thing. The FP Red which Nils runs on a 2.2 Liter engine seems the way to go for a bolton turbo for roadracing.

It has already been pointed out that the 42R is just to slow of a spooler for a circuit course and if you have to be running over 35 PSI for extended periods, then longevity will become an issue.

The 35R in all of its guises seems like the next step up powerwise, but it will not get you to the powerlevel that you are seeking. Apparently, John Schuber is running the new HTA-86 on an AMS 2.3RR longblock to the tune of 800 WHP on race gas.

The HTA86 would seem to be worth looking into for your purposes. It spools as well as an HTA 35R but is capable of over 800 WHP on Q16, or Import. Freddy302, had been running an HTA 35 and switched to an HTA 86 and gained 100 WHP at 30 PSI, producing 806 WHP.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #28  
Pure Playaer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Florida
if your going all out id go with 2.3rr
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #29  
kidwitevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Wichita Kansas
hope you have lots of road racing experience, 800 will not be fun for an ameature driver. defeats the purpose if youre not having fun.

i'd personally say a 2.2 with an fpred for the tracks that are near me. if 20k is your budget, i dont know if i'd drop 15 on a motor lol. just me personally. you always for get the little things, like 150 bucks for wheel studs, 140 bucks for lug nuts etc etc etc. i'd say start with getting the chasis where you feel comfortable, then add more and more power and retune chasis ackordingly.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #30  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
badhabit: Shxxt, man, I am planning on moving to SLO county when I retire next year and building a roadcourse Evo and trailering it to all the tracks nearby like Button, Laguna, Infineon, etc.

I had been planning on getting by with a 2-Liter drop-in motor with a Red, but since you will be in the neighborhood with your big turboed stroker, then I will most likely turn up the gas and do something similar to what you are doing, just to be able to keep your tailights in sight.

I am getting to old for this sort of thing.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:33 PM.