Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Question about HP capabilities / Power Goal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #31  
apeximprt2nr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Test Pipe and Cams you can also get a different bigger hotside and port your o2 housing
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #32  
dbsears's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
He's gotta a IX...already has a "bigger" hotside.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 03:17 AM
  #33  
hawa's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: the world
I'd get a Perrin foam element as well as a 4.5" Vibrant MAF adapter. Also, if you must have a Cat, then research the MilSpec, 100 Cell unit. Do a full 3" DP and ditch the heat wrap. An UICP is not much help. The Hallman MBC is a good investment. Reconsider your decision to not do the cams. Ditto do an O2 housing. English retune. The FP Red is your friend. More air in requires higher fuel delivery volume=Walbro. Corn fuel if available, works wonders, but requires dual Walbros and 1000 c.c. nozzles, & another English retune.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 03:25 AM
  #34  
hawa's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: the world
Originally Posted by apeximprt2nr
Test Pipe and Cams you can also get a different bigger hotside and port your o2 housing
What do you mean by bigger hotside? There is no larger A/R turbine housing than the 10.5 that comes stock on his 16G IX turbo. Did you mean larger turbine wheel? Ths would require going to an upgraded turbo such as the FP Red, FP Green, or CB BBK.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 05:24 AM
  #35  
beatrush's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Get a good cold air intake...make sure that it is not soaking hot underbonnet air...for example the APS system, amazing intake!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 05:32 AM
  #36  
prodystopian's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by dbsears
^^Definately rock the Ecuboost...let me tell you that was the biggest change I made coming from a Hallman MBC. Held over 3psi more at redline and gained a solid 20-25whp from 5500 to redline. I wouldn't waste time with an MBC again.
Anybody else recommend ECU boost over the MBC?

Originally Posted by hawa
I'd get a Perrin foam element as well as a 4.5" Vibrant MAF adapter. Also, if you must have a Cat, then research the MilSpec, 100 Cell unit. Do a full 3" DP and ditch the heat wrap. An UICP is not much help.
Does the 100 cell pass inspection in most states? Also, are you just saying the UICP wont help with power?

Originally Posted by jid2
E. Small battery and short route IC pipes will make boost response much better.
Are you talking about the UICP?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 05:46 AM
  #37  
SILVERnSLOW's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
Originally Posted by hawa
I'd get a Perrin foam element as well as a 4.5" Vibrant MAF adapter. Also, if you must have a Cat, then research the MilSpec, 100 Cell unit. Do a full 3" DP and ditch the heat wrap. An UICP is not much help. The Hallman MBC is a good investment. Reconsider your decision to not do the cams. Ditto do an O2 housing. English retune. The FP Red is your friend. More air in requires higher fuel delivery volume=Walbro. Corn fuel if available, works wonders, but requires dual Walbros and 1000 c.c. nozzles, & another English retune.
On his desired setup he would only need one Walbro if he were to switch to e85.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #38  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by prodystopian
...Does the 100 cell pass inspection in most states? Also, are you just saying the UICP wont help with power?..
I think that the MilSpec 100 cell passes CARB, but I am not sure. With respect to the UICP, I think he meant to say that since the OP already did the main power adder, which is the LICP, that the UICP would only show marginal gains at best.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 07:32 AM
  #39  
prodystopian's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by sparky
I think that the MilSpec 100 cell passes CARB, but I am not sure. With respect to the UICP, I think he meant to say that since the OP already did the main power adder, which is the LICP, that the UICP would only show marginal gains at best.
That is what I understand from a power perspective, but I would be interested to hear if it does improve boost response as I'm not really after big power as much as response.

And if anyone knows for sure about the 100 cell I'd love to know.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #40  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
Originally Posted by prodystopian
That is what I understand from a power perspective, but I would be interested to hear if it does improve boost response as I'm not really after big power as much as response.

And if anyone knows for sure about the 100 cell I'd love to know.

a short route uicp will give you better response, due to the fact that the air does not have to travel as far.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #41  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
The LICP is the one that has been shown to reduce spoolup time somewhat. Also, there are some free mods that improve spoolup, such as slightly crushing the metal DV, and tinkering with the WG preload.

EDIT: I have never swapped to an aftermarket UICP personally. So, I don´t actually know how much of an impact it´ll have on spoolup. Maybe it does help somewhat, but not to the extent that a well designed LICP does.

Last edited by sparky; Dec 5, 2008 at 03:13 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #42  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by inneedof
a short route uicp will give you better response, due to the fact that the air does not have to travel as far.

It also doesnt have the lame super bloat radiator hose couplers that the factory uses which increases throttle response.

A well designed LICP doesnt hurt spool.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #43  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
It also doesnt have the lame super bloat radiator hose couplers that the factory uses.....
Now, you´ve done it, John! I already felt selfconscious about opening the hood w/o you publishing the lameness quotient
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #44  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Hey Alvin, I can sell you my eBay O2 housing for cheap if you want. Let me know. It'll definitely get you towards your goal.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 03:49 PM
  #45  
apeximprt2nr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Just do a Red no need to touch internals
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:04 AM.