Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Cbrd bbk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 05:04 AM
  #61  
spooln2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Manheim pa
yeah i was hoping for 350 whp but i dont know what 24 psi is equal to in a stock setup. Also Caleb told me the the mustang dyno always reads lower then the other dyno's

Originally Posted by meanmud
So 330whp on his dyno with these mentioned mods? Seems a bit low.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 06:11 AM
  #62  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
you have to focus on the gains instead of the final number. you said you gained 130hp over stock right? no if this dyno reads super low which it probably does than your good! with dynos i've learned that you have to look at the gained hp rather than the final number lol
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 06:22 AM
  #63  
Cali2MDevo8's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 0
From: MD/PA line
Am I reading this wrong? Do you have an exhaust??
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 06:29 AM
  #64  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Originally Posted by vmrevo9
you have to focus on the gains instead of the final number. you said you gained 130hp over stock right? no if this dyno reads super low which it probably does than your good! with dynos i've learned that you have to look at the gained hp rather than the final number lol
Yeah - my statement of "Low" is misleading. I would like to see the graph - the way this turbo holds to redline is great as well as the area under the curve.

Just going off of memory - I thought the turbo and his mods netted a peak # around 350, that's all.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #65  
bwesley82's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: maryland
BBK full with the mods in my sig did 403 whp at 25 psi on CBRD's dyno.

Also was having some boost control issues (damn AVC-R) so the next time with this sorted out I am interested to see what 26 or 27 psi will do.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #66  
Craig King's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: NW Pennsylvania
When you go to CBRD for tuning, do they do a baseline dyno so you have a beginning reference point for power?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #67  
spooln2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Manheim pa
I will scan all the charts on Monday. My car made 322 whp at 24.1 psi I have an exhaust but it necks down to 2 1/2 after the cat and then goes to 3 inch then goes back the 2 1/2 again at the muffler chad said. Also i have a perrin high flow cat not a test pipe. He used a stock evo 8 dyno run to show what my car would have down stock. i am going to get a new exhaust and then go from there. wow 403 at 25 psi yeah i am not even in the same ball park. But you do have cams and I know that does make a big difference.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 05:05 AM
  #68  
spooln2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Manheim pa
[IMG][/IMG]

Last edited by spooln2004; Mar 23, 2009 at 05:40 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #69  
bwesley82's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: maryland
yeah cams and better flowing exhaust should make a big difference
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 03:59 PM
  #70  
MitsuJDM's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
That dyno is such a dream killer. A year ago, I dynoed 236whp with a 3" TBE, cone filter and MBC @ 21psi. I'm at 301whp after cams, LICP and test pipe. I feel the cams made the biggest difference.

Cams are an Evo's best friend.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 04:07 PM
  #71  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by mitsujdm
cams are an evo 8's best friend.
ftfy
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 05:09 AM
  #72  
spooln2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Manheim pa
[IMG][/IMG]

Here is a pik of the CBRD FMIC chad will have to chime in or the dimensions. I know a couple of people were wanting to know about it.

Last edited by spooln2004; Mar 24, 2009 at 07:07 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 05:40 AM
  #73  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
cool
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 06:01 AM
  #74  
lords3t's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville, MD
Originally Posted by MitsuJDM
That dyno is such a dream killer. A year ago, I dynoed 236whp with a 3" TBE, cone filter and MBC @ 21psi. I'm at 301whp after cams, LICP and test pipe. I feel the cams made the biggest difference.

Cams are an Evo's best friend.
Yeah, that dyno can be a bit harsh, but the power is real. Staying STU legal, I couldn't be happier with my numbers. Next year, I'll most likely be SM though

Originally Posted by spooln2004

Here is a pik of the CBRD FMIC
Any reason you ditched your mesh?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 07:09 AM
  #75  
spooln2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Manheim pa
Originally Posted by lords3t
Yeah, that dyno can be a bit harsh, but the power is real. Staying STU legal, I couldn't be happier with my numbers. Next year, I'll most likely be SM though


Any reason you ditched your mesh?
No I just wanted to take it off to show the FMIC better thats all
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:28 PM.