is there someone who make this for the evo 9?
Not to rain on your parade here but your design is faulty and will only cause your turbo to spool later. The wastegate area is not divorced between the two collectors and are just going to have a negative affect. This way worked well on single scrolls but not with a twin scroll. So far I have been the only one to successfully make a working system.
Not to rain on your parade here but your design is faulty and will only cause your turbo to spool later. The wastegate area is not divorced between the two collectors and are just going to have a negative affect. This way worked well on single scrolls but not with a twin scroll. So far I have been the only one to successfully make a working system.
Do you have any testing to back up your theory?
What is your background in regards to airflow?
How do you explain the success of any O2 housing currently available on the market?
I sincerely hope that you have good answers to the above questions otherwise you should think twice before making such an accusation.
Not to rain on your parade here but your design is faulty and will only cause your turbo to spool later. The wastegate area is not divorced between the two collectors and are just going to have a negative affect. This way worked well on single scrolls but not with a twin scroll. So far I have been the only one to successfully make a working system.
You have to provide factual data and PROVE what you say, I say a lot of stuff but without anything to backup my theory it's all talk.
If you do in fact have data please post, I am in no way trying to offend you in any way just stating the fact that this happens all the time. Everyone thinks they are experts and get behind a computer on a forum and provide no knowledgeable data at all, it's all junk!
Let's see that working system you designed.
~Zach
Pics are on page two of Revmotos work. Also a nice piece 
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...k-turbo-2.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...k-turbo-2.html
Pics are on page two of Revmotos work. Also a nice piece 
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...k-turbo-2.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...k-turbo-2.html
He should have linked us to his post if he "wants to contribute a test to the EVO community" as he says in his posts.
Rev, did you get a chance to test your results, MAP has apparently tested and have not found a design flaw, they have a dyno and also have picked up power by going with a open dump design.
~Zach
Last edited by phenem; Jun 17, 2009 at 12:15 PM.
I'm still trying to figure out what exactly he thinks he did differently to make such a bold accusation? If he is using just one wastegate (which appears to be the case) then the exhaust gases are still combining at some point before the wastegate?
Last edited by ChrisCarey; Jun 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM.
He does mention he had to machine the o2 housing and remove the wastegate collector completely, which I am not sure how he did that.
I don't see any problem with MAP's design, in fact I have consulted a couple of very knowledgeable people on exhaust flow and turbo design, they see no issue, if there is exhaust flow disruption it will be nothing to worry about. Basically there is always exhaust gas hitting one of the runners at all times (that's how the twin scroll works). So if there is exhaust gas in both the runners all the time then why does it matter that the flow combines before it hits the wastegate?
~Zach
Couple of questions for you:
Do you have any testing to back up your theory?
What is your background in regards to airflow?
How do you explain the success of any O2 housing currently available on the market?
I sincerely hope that you have good answers to the above questions otherwise you should think twice before making such an accusation.
Do you have any testing to back up your theory?
What is your background in regards to airflow?
How do you explain the success of any O2 housing currently available on the market?
I sincerely hope that you have good answers to the above questions otherwise you should think twice before making such an accusation.
Last edited by RevMoto; Jun 17, 2009 at 11:19 PM.
Exactly, I was wondering the same thing honestly. I was just going to give him a chance to answer.
He does mention he had to machine the o2 housing and remove the wastegate collector completely, which I am not sure how he did that.
I don't see any problem with MAP's design, in fact I have consulted a couple of very knowledgeable people on exhaust flow and turbo design, they see no issue, if there is exhaust flow disruption it will be nothing to worry about. Basically there is always exhaust gas hitting one of the runners at all times (that's how the twin scroll works). So if there is exhaust gas in both the runners all the time then why does it matter that the flow combines before it hits the wastegate?
~Zach
He does mention he had to machine the o2 housing and remove the wastegate collector completely, which I am not sure how he did that.
I don't see any problem with MAP's design, in fact I have consulted a couple of very knowledgeable people on exhaust flow and turbo design, they see no issue, if there is exhaust flow disruption it will be nothing to worry about. Basically there is always exhaust gas hitting one of the runners at all times (that's how the twin scroll works). So if there is exhaust gas in both the runners all the time then why does it matter that the flow combines before it hits the wastegate?
~Zach
Last edited by RevMoto; Jun 17, 2009 at 11:23 PM.
The difference between mine and yours is that my hotside is machine to where a tial flange can mate right up against the divided area near the wastegate flapper. By doing this it allowed both sides to be divided pre-wastegate. Your way is open and undivided causing a leak on both sides. This gives a negative affect on spool. I am sure your kit proved to hold the boost it should but I would bet money your spool up is hurt.
hmm they're both similar in the fact that they're both divorced...main difference i see is one of the wastegates sits a little farther downstream, i mean by all means correct me if i'm wrong.
That is the only difference but that s where the problem is created. I thought the exact thing in the beginning about when I questioned both sides being divorced but I have seen the real life affects and this is why I say this.
What is the need for all of the added flow capacity out of the wg for a stock frame turbo? I have not seen a single evo7-9 creep with a proper exhaust setup, even an FP red at 20psi.. After having EWG's on my DSM's I am happy to use an internal as long as I possibly can
Almost seems like it's "the thing to do" now but the only gain I can see from a properly set up car is reduced backpressure if you are dumping, and if you already have a good flowing exhaust even that gain will be negligible.
Almost seems like it's "the thing to do" now but the only gain I can see from a properly set up car is reduced backpressure if you are dumping, and if you already have a good flowing exhaust even that gain will be negligible.
you can just weld the wastegate flapper shut.....then buy the MAP downpipe or o2 hosing with the tial 38mm wastegate and it will help you hold boost and stop boost creep....i do not no what MAPS design will do for spool up thou.
and external wastegate is alot better for making power then the little flapper inside the evo ix turbo, red, green, bbk.
the tial external will help out alot.....alot more then just a o2 dump.
and external wastegate is alot better for making power then the little flapper inside the evo ix turbo, red, green, bbk.
the tial external will help out alot.....alot more then just a o2 dump.
Last edited by EvoDom; Jun 18, 2009 at 05:11 AM.







