HTA gt35r vs PT6262

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 25, 2010 | 01:57 AM

#16

EvolutinIX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 659

Likes: 0

From: Rio Rancho NM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xracers13

i would argue in favor of the hta35r. The redesigned billet compressor wheel flows much better than the standard garrett spec 35r. With the hta they were able to improve spool time and power production.

Jan 25, 2010 | 02:19 AM

#17

tweaker41

Evolving Member

iTrader: (36)

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 416

Likes: 1

From: Western Slope

Quote:

Originally Posted by PigHoof

Both turbos will flow well above 700whp on a 4 cylinder but if it came down to the 2 I would have to take the hta as well. Im not sure if the minimally faster spool will particularly justify the extra cost to YOU but I do want to throw out there that many people have had numerous problems with these turbos. Although it is partially due to the person doing the install, many have reported problems with the JBs not lasting long on high boost levels. They do require a restrictor fitting on the oil feed and are notorious for being finicky with various oil pressures. You are supposed to be a little safer going with a BB unit from precision but thats another $500 option

The 6262 SP Dual Ceramic BB, Billet, Air Cooled, blah blah only costs around 1400, I'm pretty sure the HTA35's cost more than that.

Jan 25, 2010 | 03:34 AM

#18

MR. EVO MR

Account Disabled

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 1,761

Likes: 4

From: :noitacoL

Quote:

Originally Posted by ch53avitech

Money is no issue as long as I'm getting the best parts I can get.

I have a fully built motor and I'll be running 93 pump gas. I'm looking for ~600hp and I'd like to make a mid to low 10 sec pass in the quarter. I'm leaning towards the FP HTA86 because of what I've read.

im making 600hp on my fpred, with boost starting @ 3800 area

Jan 25, 2010 | 04:11 AM

#19

mrboost05

Evolved Member

iTrader: (25)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 1,132

Likes: 2

From: maryland/west chester pa

on what dyno ?

Jan 25, 2010 | 01:58 PM

#20

Freddy302

Evolved Member

iTrader: (29)

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 644

Likes: 3

From: CT

I have had all three on these on my car, dont ask me why. HTA82 twice, HTA86 twice and the 6262 once. They are all close.. But the HTA86 seems to always spool faster and make more top end then the 6262. Dont know if any one has done a real back to back test.

HTA86 makes about 25 more hp then the 6262, the HTA82 makes about 25 hp less then the 6262. Both HTA out spool the 6262.

Jan 26, 2010 | 12:48 AM

#21

riceball777

Evolved Member

iTrader: (33)

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 1,367

Likes: 1

From: Los Angeles

no love for the HTA gt3582R

Jan 26, 2010 | 04:40 AM

#22

E85evo8

Evolving Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 462

Likes: 0

From: New York

I love my HTA 3582r!! Once I get used to the hp and desire more, I will be sending in my 3582r to FP for the upgrade to a 3586r!!

Jan 26, 2010 | 05:09 AM

#23

kouzman

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 2,269

Likes: 0

From: NYC

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR. EVO MR

im making 600hp on my fpred, with boost starting @ 3800 area

Not on pumpgas and not with 30psi or less....

The hta3582 outspools the other 62mm turbos... It's billet, bb and smaller thus a bit lighter than the other two... Completely maxed out it could see maybe 700-720whp on a fully built/prepped car.

The other two will be under the same scenario 80-100whp more I think...

Jan 26, 2010 | 12:16 PM

#24

E85evo8

Evolving Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 462

Likes: 0

From: New York

the 3582r will no doubt make over 700whp on a fully built evo pushing 40psi or more. I made close to 640whp on 36psi of boost falling to 32psi by redline on E70.