clutch flywheel combo???
clutch flywheel combo???
I'm about to purchase the ACT HDSS clutch and was curious what was the benefit of a new lightweight flywheel? Is it needed or just recommended? Should i just buy it to put it in at the same time? I know I'll save labor but was just curious of the benefits of both together.
thanks guys! and girls!
thanks guys! and girls!
Before I did my clutch I talked to a bunch of people on the forum and a couple of the local guys. Everyone who did the clutch and stayed on the stock flywheel told me that they regret not going with a lighter flywheel. When I did my ACT clutch I had the prolite flywheel installed as well with no regrets.
Hah an ACT on mine and had the same lockout issue. It is well know on this forum that ACT has lockout issues at high RPM. Maybe it doesn't happen to everyone, but there has been a lot of discussion. You should research other clutches also. Fidanza's 3.2 has been reviewed.
its seems hit and miss with the act clutches
the findanza 3.2 seems to be good at start and die pretty quick
as far as my research im going with the clutchmasters fx300
so far it has the best reviews in my opinion....
Trending Topics
Save the money and go with a twin disc and never look back. I wish I would have done this to begin with. Lock out will eventually happen with the ACT trust me, I have seen it happen time and time again.
TTP from south Florida has a special model of ACT clutch he's selling that supposedly doesn't have any lock-out issues on evo's. PM him for some pricing and info before you order your HDSS.
http://www.ttp-engineering.com/
As far as the flywheel. I run a prolite. Yes it's nice. The engine revs very freely. It responds noticeably quicker to throttle inputs. Rev matching downshifting is nice. Now the drawbacks: Starting off in first gear is a little tricky. Starting off on a hill takes a lot of throttle and clutch work. Long story short it stalls easier and is overall harder to daily drive with a lighter flywheel. From a performance standpoint I would say lighter is better. I've also heard that it helps the longevity of the clutch with the overall reduced rotational mass of the unit.
If you do go lite flywheel get ACT. The fidanzas are an aluminum steel sandwich. There's been issues with the starter gear seperating. The ACT's are a single piece of steel.
http://www.ttp-engineering.com/
As far as the flywheel. I run a prolite. Yes it's nice. The engine revs very freely. It responds noticeably quicker to throttle inputs. Rev matching downshifting is nice. Now the drawbacks: Starting off in first gear is a little tricky. Starting off on a hill takes a lot of throttle and clutch work. Long story short it stalls easier and is overall harder to daily drive with a lighter flywheel. From a performance standpoint I would say lighter is better. I've also heard that it helps the longevity of the clutch with the overall reduced rotational mass of the unit.
If you do go lite flywheel get ACT. The fidanzas are an aluminum steel sandwich. There's been issues with the starter gear seperating. The ACT's are a single piece of steel.
Last edited by JohnDoe1984; Oct 28, 2009 at 01:40 PM.




