Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2010 Borg Warner Airwerks Turbo catalog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #571  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by n2oiroc
did you guys ever get the correct dyno sheet from sierra sierra with the cam timing corrected?
I asked FR about that a few days ago. They said something about having trouble getting sensitive information posted
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 07:40 PM
  #572  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Geoff,
LMK what kind of timeline I'm looking at to get the 1.05AR divided T4 7670. I'm ready to jump on this bandwagon.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 08:33 PM
  #573  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I am thinking very strongly on the 91-80 after today. Gonna sell a kidney, a ball, and kill 3 people but the sacrifice seems that'd be worth it to make 820 at 32psi.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #574  
Force-Fed Performance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, Fayetteville NC
^^ we are in the same boat. we are swapping our 6765 for it also
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #575  
juanmedina's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: greenville, sc
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I am thinking very strongly on the 91-80 after today. Gonna sell a kidney, a ball, and kill 3 people but the sacrifice seems that'd be worth it to make 820 at 32psi.
Originally Posted by Force-Fed Performance
^^ we are in the same boat. we are swapping our 6765 for it also
please do it soon, I can't wait to see the results
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 05:22 PM
  #576  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I am thinking very strongly on the 91-80 after today. Gonna sell a kidney, a ball, and kill 3 people but the sacrifice seems that'd be worth it to make 820 at 32psi.
Id like to see how the 9180 performs also. on the 2.4 right? based on that dyno sheet it looks pretty good compared to what is out right now.

Or id like to also see the 8374.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 05:33 PM
  #577  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
glad to see some of the top evo guys showing interest in these. cant wait for results!
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 09:43 AM
  #578  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
LMK what kind of timeline I'm looking at to get the 1.05AR divided T4 7670. I'm ready to jump on this bandwagon.
All the Divided T4 EFR's are scheduled to be available early February. Ive been losing sleep over how to setup my evo with the 7670.. intake manifold, cams, cyl head, bottom end, LSD, ohh boy the options

Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I am thinking very strongly on the 91-80 after today. Gonna sell a kidney, a ball, and kill 3 people but the sacrifice seems that'd be worth it to make 820 at 32psi.
the 9180 is the monster in the family - 95lb/min from a 67mm compressor is remarkable .. for reference a 70mm gt4294R is approx 85lb/min
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #579  
Force-Fed Performance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, Fayetteville NC
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
All the Divided T4 EFR's are scheduled to be available early February. Ive been losing sleep over how to setup my evo with the 7670.. intake manifold, cams, cyl head, bottom end, LSD, ohh boy the options



the 9180 is the monster in the family - 95lb/min from a 67mm compressor is remarkable .. for reference a 70mm gt4294R is approx 85lb/min
Gotcha
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 01:14 PM
  #580  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
All the Divided T4 EFR's are scheduled to be available early February. Ive been losing sleep over how to setup my evo with the 7670.. intake manifold, cams, cyl head, bottom end, LSD, ohh boy the options

the 9180 is the monster in the family - 95lb/min from a 67mm compressor is remarkable .. for reference a 70mm gt4294R is approx 85lb/min
Upgrade path and usage You know as well as I do its easy to overthink the project sometimes. Drag vs road race (I'd assume more track stuff?) will affect what intake, cams and head the same way.

I am more interested in the fact that the 91-80 spools like my current setup with a 2.2 vs the 2.4 I am running (T3 0.82 A/r) and make more power at less boost. All in all it seems that its the direction I am leaning. Decided against a smaller turbo since less power is less fun

I'll build another car first if I need less power

aaron
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 01:20 PM
  #581  
miragevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 488
Likes: 7
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I am thinking very strongly on the 91-80 after today. Gonna sell a kidney, a ball, and kill 3 people but the sacrifice seems that'd be worth it to make 820 at 32psi.

What's the ETA of you having the 91-80 in your hands, bolted in and tested?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 01:25 PM
  #582  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
I see alot of supra guys running these! With good results! I'm in for some testing! The big boy that is! You think this will be ok on our build Aaron? 95lbs per minute is putting in some work!
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 01:28 PM
  #583  
38six's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Upgrade path and usage You know as well as I do its easy to overthink the project sometimes. Drag vs road race (I'd assume more track stuff?) will affect what intake, cams and head the same way.

I am more interested in the fact that the 91-80 spools like my current setup with a 2.2 vs the 2.4 I am running (T3 0.82 A/r) and make more power at less boost. All in all it seems that its the direction I am leaning. Decided against a smaller turbo since less power is less fun

I'll build another car first if I need less power

aaron
I thought about going this route also, then I thought about the carnage it may cause
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 02:00 PM
  #584  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by miragevo
What's the ETA of you having the 91-80 in your hands, bolted in and tested?
Some depends on Geoff, some depends on the guy buying my 3586 kit, some on a loan thats supposed to be repaid to me. Hopefully sooner rather than later, but from his description it wont be ready until February at the earliest.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 02:01 PM
  #585  
sho669's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 1
From: Humboldt/Sac County, CA
Sent ya a PM Geoff ready to order a 9180 right now! I'm losing sleep over it!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24 PM.