Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

AWESOME information and results, take a read.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2009, 12:34 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
AWESOME information and results, take a read.

Ok, so we have a customer, Dan, who sent his car here for a build. Not a small build but a major build. The car was pretty much entirely Buschur Racing parts.

BR Stage 3 shortblock
BR Stage 3 head
BR double pumper
PTE1200 cc injectors
BR upper i/c pipe with 1G BOV
BR turbo kit with HTA86 and .82 turbine housing
BR Race FMIC
BF272 cams
Manual boost controller
STOCK ECU
PUMP GAS only

The car was to be left on stock ECU for emission testing that is coming up. When the tuning was finished the power ended up at 454 whp and 399 ft lbs of torque. I ran the car up to 32 psi of boost to make this power. Not stellar but the car ran good and smooth and it's all I could get out of it.

Dan, the customer, just wasn't happy. Asked what we could do to make more. We dedided on installling an AEM EMS, he got a deal on a used one and sent it in. The car was put back on the dyno and I was able to gain 28 whp and run the car at 29.84 psi instead of the 32 I had to run previously. The switch to the AEM gained power but the gains were over 6500 rpm. Not nearly as much power as I had hoped for, but again, all the car would make.

Now, let me add some details to this. First off, I do not sell parts that someone doesn't need and my guys are directed to do the same thing. We will not just tell you something to take your money, it's not how I want treated and we don't do it to someone else. This is at times, like this car will prove, a fault. We advise what should be done but won't push a point to sound like some douche bag salesman and after this car, maybe we should push a little harder. Dan wanted to keep the car on the stock ECU for emission testing. When we decided to switch to the AEM he requested to make it a simple plug in ordeal. This meant when he wants to switch back to the stock ECU for testing he can simply plug his stock sensors back in and unplug the AEM sensors. So some extra wiring was done and we kept the stock MAF in place, unplugged, and the 3" BR MAF inlet pipe along with some big foam Perrin filter in place.

So, Dan tells me he doesn't want to bother me and is baffled why the power is still "low". Now keep in mind, 478 whp on pump gas on our dyno is still a lot of power. I listen to him, he's extremely easy to deal with and polite. He asks if the 1G BOV could be leaking. I tell him I doubt it, it's crushed and the boost is relatively flat. He asks about the big foam air filter, I told him it looked fine to me. He asked about the stock ignition.............BINGO!! OK, maybe we are losing some power to the ignition I told him, although the car is running perfectly clean at 30+ psi. I told him we'd swap the BOV which could be leaking and I'd dyno that then put the BR COP on the car and see if it gained.

So, the car comes in today and I walk past the car, glance under the hood and didn't like what I see. I didn't really realize the stock MAF was in still with this big foam filter. So I ask Trent to make a quick 4" inlet pipe and use one of the 4" Green filters on it. I was trying my best to NOT make the bill any larger than it was although not once has Dan ever questioned or mentioned it, very fair guy.

They weld the new Tial BOV on the BR upper i/c pipe, put the 4" intake and filter on and put the car on the dyno. That's when it started, the betting. Bets were being placed to how much the car was going to gain. The highest number was Trent's who guessed 50 whp. He asked me what I thought and I said I had no idea.

The first pull told the tale instantly. The AFR's over about 5500 rpm started going lean and never stopped getting leaner all the way to 8,000 rpm. I knew air flow had been substantially increased and looking at the dyno screen I was shocked!!

I dialed the AFR's back in, left them at about 11.7:1, I had to turn the boost DOWN 1.5 turns on the controller to get it to come down to 29 psi again.

End result, this bad boy gained 55 whp and 11 ft lbs of torque from a freaking BOV and air filter/maf pipe change!! Now that is just flat out amazing.

Here I was content with the car and not wanting to push every part we make on the customer and just do what he asked us to do. Luckily for me, Dan was just not happy and asked ME to help figure it out and get more.

I'd have never guessed, ever, that those two parts would net gains of this much.

You have to understand that I was pushing the car for all it had to get the 478 whp. After those two changes I backed it down and STILL gained 55 whp. You can see by the below dyno graph the gains from getting some air into the engine both through the filter and from the boost not leaking out the BOV.

Freaking incredible.

Here's the dyno sheet of the stock ECU, then AEM and last BOV/Filter change.



Dan, THANK YOU for pushing me a little to improve the car, what I learned today has lit a fire under my butt!! Thank you for bringing the car, thank you for not being satisified. You've been a pleasure to deal with.
Old Oct 20, 2009, 12:40 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
red03evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dave,

Is this dan guy a nice guy?? lol




By the way, thanks to you all at BR. You, Dan, and Nick putting up with me. lol

Last edited by red03evo; Oct 20, 2009 at 01:01 PM.
Old Oct 20, 2009, 12:47 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
03whitegsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,001
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
This would be a perfect high power car to see how the stock ECU Speed density patch works out compared to the AEM.
Old Oct 20, 2009, 12:57 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's crazy indeed!

It's like I knew it! LOL!

When I installed my FS635 I didn't even bother with the 3" intake pipe and stock bov. I got a tial bov, the massive full 4" dejon turbo pipe and the larger K+N filter I could fit between the pipe and the acd tank! So happy that I made That change because David just proved that it works!!!

Also I think Dynoflash had made a similar test with the intake pipe and AMS also with significant gains!
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:02 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
 
crcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd love to see what power it would make now with just the MAF back in place.
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:03 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
rec03evo, yes that Dan guy is super nice and easy to deal with Pat yourself on the back!
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:19 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
warp9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near the hOle
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder which part was the biggest problem. I say the BOV? So will Dan stay on the AEM or stock ecu?
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:40 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 65 Likes on 49 Posts
I havent noticed 55whp but I have seen around 30whp on a 82HTA at 26psi. Thanks for the tech, Dave
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:41 PM
  #9  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Damn, slap the original intake back on and see if it was the bov or the maf sucking up the power!

Good info, but again raises more questions about stock ecu on speed density vs AEM. Thx Dave.
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:41 PM
  #10  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I havent noticed 55whp but I have seen around 30whp on a 82HTA at 26psi. Thanks for the tech, Dave
From ditching the MAF?
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:42 PM
  #11  
CMB
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
CMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Near water
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gotta be the BOV mostly imo. Im surprised it wasnt on the to do list by the customer? There has gotta be a better Recirc BOV that BR can offer? Maybe the Tial Q since hes already flanged
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:42 PM
  #12  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
 
EVO8LTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,603
Received 95 Likes on 82 Posts
"Dan" you better lead on the drive back home when we go to pick up our cars on Friday. I want to stay out of your way!
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:47 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 65 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by scheides
From ditching the MAF?
Yeah we did a similar test in June (results somewhere in the ECUflash forum). 3" true cold air (went into the fender where the sprayer res should be) was 482 @ 26 and on the edge on timing. Pulled it off, car made 495 with absolutely no changes to the tune. Next day spent a little more time on the car and was able to add 2 degrees in that the night before it would not take. Got the power up to 510.
Old Oct 20, 2009, 01:48 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
red03evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
"Dan" you better lead on the drive back home when we go to pick up our cars on Friday. I want to stay out of your way!

lol,
Old Oct 20, 2009, 02:09 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
 
leecavturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 1,392
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
thats mental and just reinforces improvements to pre turbo can be significant
another reason why the forward facing manifolds work so good too.
good work david



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 AM.