Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Quaife or Wavetrac?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #1  
WHTEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO
Quaife or Wavetrac?

I am looking into replacing my front diff in my car while my tranny is out. I like that the Quaife units have a lifetime warranty. I am also hearing that the Wavetrac's are pretty good as well. Do they carry a lifetime warranty? All i found was it stating it had a limited lifetime warranty. Please include any personal experiences with either diff that you may have. Are there any pros or cons to either? Thanks in advance for any input.

Also, any vendors on here who carry either one, please PM me your best price shipped to 80910. Thanks.

Aaron
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #2  
G20's Avatar
G20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 14
From: Orange County, CA
contact RoadRaceEngineering.com for the Wavetrac.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #3  
Force-Fed Performance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, Fayetteville NC
Both are GREAT companies. Quaife is had a great rep for a long time now, but i am curious of these new wavetracs. It seems they are putting a ton of engineering in their units now and seem to be very strong
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 10:52 AM
  #4  
pfunk47's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Lansing, mi
I am having the same dilemma + I found another one to add to the mix. The RA/RS Helical Diff.


http://teamrip.com/EVO_TRANSFER_CASE_SERVICES.html


Shep offers Quaife & Wavetrac
TRE offers RA/RS only (though I am sure they will put in whatever you buy)

If they are all considered equals (strength, amount of traction provided), the Quaife would be the winner due to it's lifetime warranty.

Correct?

Can anyone using either post their thoughts/experience
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #5  
SBR INC's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Wavetrac also offers a transferable life time warranty.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #6  
rascal's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Is'nt the wavetrac a 1 way?

Last edited by rascal; Dec 2, 2009 at 02:51 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #7  
griceiv's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 71
From: LA, CA
I've run both the quaife and a wavetrac. I can't tell a difference other than I can't get the driver side stub axle split ring to install into the wavetrac...kinda sucks. I finally just gave up and took the ring off.

They're the same price, same warranty, same driveablity.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #8  
awd2gen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 466
Likes: 1
From: Frederick, MD
I had talked to shep about both of these when i was thinking about building my tranny. He told me that if its more of a DD and street driven rather than weekend warrior or track car then go with the wavetrac. qualife i believe is a bit more harsh but performs better...not saying that the wavetrac is bad quality by any circomstance though.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 07:25 AM
  #9  
WHTEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO
Anyone else with any feedback on these?

Aaron
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #10  
WHTEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO
Well i went with the Wavetrac for a couple reasons (cost was not a factor with deciding) which i now have installed. We have some pretty crappy weather here currently so i haven't been able to test it out.

Aaron
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 02:32 PM
  #11  
bbyevo8u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 2
From: NY
is the t-case the front diff?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 02:35 AM
  #12  
jassem99's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Middle East
During abrupt autocross type maneuvers when ONE of the front tires might lose traction, I did notice the wavetrac gives you a very brief window before reverting to open diff characteristics (as all torsens do eventually). This is in contrast to the quaife which would immediately start spinning the inside tire when one of the tires lifted or lost traction. The difference in the wavetrac and quaife was most apparent when doing 360's around a cone.

I did come across the ring issue mentioned above though, necessitating machining a new groove in the axle.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 08:29 AM
  #13  
pfunk47's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Lansing, mi
Originally Posted by jassem99
During abrupt autocross type maneuvers when ONE of the front tires might lose traction, I did notice the wavetrac gives you a very brief window before reverting to open diff characteristics (as all torsens do eventually). This is in contrast to the quaife which would immediately start spinning the inside tire when one of the tires lifted or lost traction. The difference in the wavetrac and quaife was most apparent when doing 360's around a cone.

I did come across the ring issue mentioned above though, necessitating machining a new groove in the axle.
Would the Carbonetics or any other 1.5 / 2 way diff prevent this from happening? I believe it will which brings the question, why did you (or anyone) chose Wavetrac/Quaife over a 1.5/2 way?

Price?
Rebuild factor/cost?

Sorry for all the questions, this is the next path in the upgrade process and I am trying to make an informed decision on which to go with. Wavetrac/Quife/Carbonetics or Cusco
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #14  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
I'd say durability/reliability... Not a fan of clutch type front diffs on anything but a race car that gets frequent servicing. People can say well I did this, or I did that. However, 10k (or sometimes MUCH less) miles later, someone who truly knows what a car is supposed to do will notice the clutch type diffs wearing out. Whereas the gear types like Quaife, you take it out when you wear out the car from around it (sleight exaggeration )... Pardon the grammer/spelling from the phone/freeway.

For example, my stock rear diff is shot... My older OE RS front diff still going strong. IMO the RS front is fine for the road racer/daily driver. However, the drag racer/auto-X clutch pedal side stepper would be better served with the Quaife/Wavetec type units for the front. For the rear, being that the Evo likes to hike a rear leg, I WOULD stick with a clutch type out back for obvious reasons. Not to mention, it's easy to get to, and about $250ish for "good" rebuilds.

Last edited by Zeus; Dec 28, 2009 at 12:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 09:18 PM
  #15  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,822
Likes: 279
From: US
is this an improvement over a stock ix's helical?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 PM.