Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

02 Dumps ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 12:27 AM
  #61  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Mike, What was the turbo you were testing on?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 01:30 AM
  #62  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
People are reading to much into this. The ghetto ebay 02 housing showed 15WHP on Buschur's dyno on his own race car, he now sells them. The Evo Power Mods 02 housing owns even more as it has the largest internal area and flows the most which is what you want. EPM is what I run it is what I recommend.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 08:13 AM
  #63  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by High_PSI
The Evo Power Mods 02 housing owns even more as it has the largest internal area and flows the most which is what you want. EPM is what I run it is what I recommend.
No offense, but I'm going to have to disagree here. Please help me understand how "the largest internal area" is a benefit? Did you see the huge obstruction that I posted on the previous page? The EPM unit goes from 2.5" at the turbine outlet, to a 3" section of tubing, and back down to 2.5" at the flange (also known as a bottleneck) without even attempting to make a smooth transition. That wall of material is going to cause turbulence and hinder flow... Not to mention the mild steel flanges that rust and the lower intercooler pipe fitment issues. Does it do the job? Yes. Can it be done better? That's why we made ours
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 08:22 AM
  #64  
detroit pistins's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 19
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
No offense, but I'm going to have to disagree here. Please help me understand how "the largest internal area" is a benefit? Did you see the huge obstruction that I posted on the previous page? The EPM unit goes from 2.5" at the turbine outlet, to a 3" section of tubing, and back down to 2.5" at the flange (also known as a bottleneck) without even attempting to make a smooth transition. That wall of material is going to cause turbulence and hinder flow... Not to mention the mild steel flanges that rust and the lower intercooler pipe fitment issues. Does it do the job? Yes. Can it be done better? That's why we made ours
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 12:24 PM
  #65  
Turbojunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: nw
Decided

Well. i made my choice. I'm going to give he map unit a shot. thank you chris for the impute and your time sir. hope this works as I'm expecting

Last edited by Turbojunkie; Jan 20, 2010 at 01:38 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #66  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Anytime sir, thank you for your business!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 02:06 PM
  #67  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Dumps seems like this is the single most debated thing in all of the car world haha. Youve got dump vs regular o2. then youve got dump vs dump...2.5" to 3" back to 2.5"...3" all the way...2.5" only, ebay housing ftw, screw the donut gasket, eat the donut gasket. Im making an o2 housing out of legos, screw this.



I need a nap now
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #68  
Turbojunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: nw
Originally Posted by Svendiesel
Dumps seems like this is the single most debated thing in all of the car world haha. Youve got dump vs regular o2. then youve got dump vs dump...2.5" to 3" back to 2.5"...3" all the way...2.5" only, ebay housing ftw, screw the donut gasket, eat the donut gasket. Im making an o2 housing out of legos, screw this.



I need a map 02 now
fixed it for u
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #69  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
its funny because thats what Im likely going with to try is the MAP.

Im going with an fp black setup and I do plan on getting both a ported/coated megan AND a dump and swapping them out between dyno pulls to see if there are any huge differences. From what it sounds like the dump is 100% necessary on the black and there will absolutely be gains to be had from a dump, but this is something I need to see it for myself in front of my own eyes.

Last edited by Svendiesel; Jan 20, 2010 at 09:39 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:40 PM
  #70  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Svendiesel
Dumps seems like this is the single most debated thing in all of the car world haha. Youve got dump vs regular o2. then youve got dump vs dump...2.5" to 3" back to 2.5"...3" all the way...2.5" only, ebay housing ftw, screw the donut gasket, eat the donut gasket. Im making an o2 housing out of legos, screw this.



I need a nap now
Nothing even close to intake manifold debates.. Not even in the same ballpark by any chance..
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:41 PM
  #71  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
Mike, What was the turbo you were testing on?
Our testing was on Stock IX turbo and FP green on E85.. Both making 450+ whp..
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:46 PM
  #72  
06MREvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Turbojunkie
Well. i made my choice. I'm going to give he map unit a shot. thank you chris for the impute and your time sir. hope this works as I'm expecting
don't think you will be disappointed...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:49 PM
  #73  
evoracingstar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 1
From: C.T
awesome product for stock turbos!!! and my boy got it sounds nasty for stock turbo, defiantly make sum decent amount of power with that upgrade..
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 11:23 PM
  #74  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
Our testing was on Stock IX turbo and FP green on E85.. Both making 450+ whp..
See I don't believe that the stock turbos make more power on dumps. The Red and especially the Black should benefit greatly because of the increased pre-turbine pressure... Robert has done a lot of testing and I stand by what he says

Mikey
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:23 AM
  #75  
EvolutinIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho NM
The MAPerformance one is a very nice piece, and is only $264 shipped! I have been looking around a lot lately and it is the best quality/price balance yet.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 PM.