Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

GT35RL whats diff??

Old Feb 21, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #1  
2003evolution's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, CT
GT35RL whats diff??

My GT55RL Turbo looks diff than other GT35RL why is that? help me out here s my turbo picture. Thanks

Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #2  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
looks like precision ported the compressor cover.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #3  
boostin350z's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: in fooking bruges!
sure did, thats an upgrade over a standard 35rl
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 07:50 AM
  #4  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
GT3582RLS

GT - Garrett Turbochargers "GT series"
35 - Frame size
82 - Compressor's exducer diameter in mm
R- Ball Bearing
L - Liquid cooled
S - S Cover (4" in/ 2.5" out)
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 09:07 AM
  #5  
Guru's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: Deeetroit
That is kinda dumb. All R series are liquid cooled.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 12:49 PM
  #6  
2003evolution's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, CT
i mean i have seen few pictures out there and it looks so diff than what i have. and thanks for the helpful.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #7  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Bad *** little 35r
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #8  
2003evolution's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, CT
this picture thats what im talking about. whats the diff than my turbo? better air flow?

Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #9  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
^ The same I think... Just different surge porting techniques.

Mikey
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #10  
2003evolution's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, CT
diff air flow into better suck air into? maybe better? just wondering.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 07:00 PM
  #11  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
I would say it flows better. It just wouldn't surge and prob works better than the precision design anti surge porting. Did you want me to tell you yours is better, flow better, and produces more hp?

Mikey
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #12  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
non ported has slightly better efficiency, but you cant always run them.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #13  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
+1 correct. Sorry i forgot to mention that. Same thing with the 64mm vs. 84mm FP Red. The 84mm Produce less overall hp due to efficiency.

Mikey
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 AM.