Buschur/Motor Porn :-)
Mar 23, 2010, 03:53 AM
#33
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Beach, FL / Miami, FL / Pt. St. Lucie, FL / NYC
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very true he does but lets not get into the shout out of tuners because Junior from The Shop in Norwalk and PeteyTurbo from Krazy House Customs are also very good tuners well who am I kidding probably 2 of the best tuners in the tri-state especially when it comes to tuning big reliable horsepower
Mar 23, 2010, 07:46 AM
#36
Me too man. I wish I had more time to play with her. I own a few businesses that are doing really well at the moment, so my free time is very limited. It's a good problem I guess, but still a bit frusterating. Seems like the more money I make the less time I have.
Mar 23, 2010, 09:54 AM
#39
I know, and I think I know why. When fitting the manifold up to the block; the manifold comes very close to the block. Makes me believe that maybe fitting all that tubing down there is a challenge. From what I've read though, they perform exceptionally well. The longer runners are supposed to keep the boost pressure up between shifts, and there are a few other benefits too. When you see an all out drag evo you probably notice the runners are huuuge. Same concept I believe. It's also esthetically pleasing 
Anytime. Mike@AWD suggested it. Said he thought it would best suite what I was trying to do with my car.
Anytime. Mike@AWD suggested it. Said he thought it would best suite what I was trying to do with my car.
Mar 23, 2010, 11:38 AM
#40
Treason I say!Me too!! I want to put a "Spirit of Competition" Sticker on it
increasing runner size/ length has similar effects to increasing turbine size. Although the effects aren't as drastic longer runners yield top end but cost spool and vica versa for shorter runners. Shouldn't do anything for transient response.... no lift shifting would tho haha.
Mar 23, 2010, 08:03 PM
#42
increasing runner size/ length has similar effects to increasing turbine size. Although the effects aren't as drastic longer runners yield top end but cost spool and vica versa for shorter runners. Shouldn't do anything for transient response.... no lift shifting would tho haha.
The Peakboost HVS Topmount is better because of a couple simple reasons.
1. The "HVS"on the kit is nothing more than high volume speed. That is the longer collector given.
2. The top mount has longer runners. By having such longer runners paired up with the hvs style top mount that helps keep boost during shifting. Those long runners hold up the volume speed. So instead of losing the boost then building it back up, it helps aid in this.
20gmr - please stop spreading misinformation.
Mar 24, 2010, 09:19 AM
#45
Straight from Peakboost Everyone.
The Peakboost HVS Topmount is better because of a couple simple reasons.
1. The "HVS"on the kit is nothing more than high volume speed. That is the longer collector given.
2. The top mount has longer runners. By having such longer runners paired up with the hvs style top mount that helps keep boost during shifting. Those long runners hold up the volume speed. So instead of losing the boost then building it back up, it helps aid in this.
20gmr - please stop spreading misinformation.
The Peakboost HVS Topmount is better because of a couple simple reasons.
1. The "HVS"on the kit is nothing more than high volume speed. That is the longer collector given.
2. The top mount has longer runners. By having such longer runners paired up with the hvs style top mount that helps keep boost during shifting. Those long runners hold up the volume speed. So instead of losing the boost then building it back up, it helps aid in this.
20gmr - please stop spreading misinformation.
Yeah your probly right... Should just read what they put in the ads and beleive that 100%. I don't see why you would want to understand how it works or why.
Your explanation isn't even an explanation, its a qoute from the company saying it works. I sell metric vice grips if you are looking for a set