2.0L 4G63 or 2.4L 4g64
A lot of times a personal loan is between 10-12%...

There is my financial 2 cents!
Mikey
How about save half what you need, after that apply for a new credit card that offers no Interest for 12 months for the entire amount. You also may want to add 2k to whatever you're quoted for the build as cushion in case there are problems or upgrades that were not budgeted in. Simply pay it off in a year with no interest and build credit at the same time. I did that 4 years ago with my mr2 to build my credit since I didn't have a credit history. But you must be disciplined when it comes to money, because those credit card offers have really high interest rates after the year and you're F'ed (>20% interest) if you dont pay off your balance in the first year.
My full build, including interior, exterior, LR2.4, etc., etc., etc. is costing alomst $70K total. That's a bunch of custom stuff too and paint. It's very easy to spend the above-mentioned figures on the motor. Granted, I'm going all-out, full-blown show/drag car with all top-shelf parts, but still... This silliness isn't cheap!
i understand you did a high end build with a lot of custom parts and thats going to cost you for sure, but i was only talking about a off the shelf standard built long block, trans, clutch and lobar + good core trade!
sh!! i prob put over 15k in mods alone into my car now as its sits, but im not counting that
sh!! i prob put over 15k in mods alone into my car now as its sits, but im not counting that
Last edited by bbyevo8u; Dec 31, 2010 at 07:48 PM.
bbyevo im going to send you my stuff does not include built tranny or transfer case give you a real ideal of what it cost man a full build is really something that must be planned out costwise verus real life responsibilities. Dont forget things happen and might require extra spending
IF you can reduce the mass of the connecting rods and pistons... you can rev these engines higher.
The longrod with the lightweight (short compression height) pistons helps geometricaly (kinematics) as well as forces applied to the bearing, crank, and rod bolts.
The next step would be using a larger stroke crankshaft 102 with the 156mm rods with an even shorter compression height (moving the wrist pin up in the oiling ring much like the LS7 or what AMS does to their 2.3RR) Of course you're going to be increasing the force due to the increase in acceleration for a given RPM... so to counteract... use lighter, exotic, more expensive materials.
This then costs much more than an off the shelf 2.4 crank, rods, and pistons. I think it would be interesting to build a lightweight 2.6L or so. Its interesting because the SRT4 guys are building 2.8L's lol. IMO its the wrong direction, but its interesting to hypothesize.
The longrod with the lightweight (short compression height) pistons helps geometricaly (kinematics) as well as forces applied to the bearing, crank, and rod bolts.
The next step would be using a larger stroke crankshaft 102 with the 156mm rods with an even shorter compression height (moving the wrist pin up in the oiling ring much like the LS7 or what AMS does to their 2.3RR) Of course you're going to be increasing the force due to the increase in acceleration for a given RPM... so to counteract... use lighter, exotic, more expensive materials.
This then costs much more than an off the shelf 2.4 crank, rods, and pistons. I think it would be interesting to build a lightweight 2.6L or so. Its interesting because the SRT4 guys are building 2.8L's lol. IMO its the wrong direction, but its interesting to hypothesize.
if you want a 2.4l go with the 4g64 block as its a 2.4l unstroked
when i get my motor build i think im going with a 4g64 LR 2.2 with HTA3582 kit! but i know it aint gonna be cheap
Last edited by bbyevo8u; Jan 1, 2011 at 06:33 AM.



