Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

STOCK BOOST and 403 at the wheels...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 10:02 AM
  #16  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
As much as I hate to agree with Al, something does look to be amiss with the ignition system. However, it think it may have something to do with the way the AEM is charging the factory coils, not the coils themselves. This isn't unusual with stand alones/piggy-backs that attemp to charge the factory ignition coils. They often do so less well than the factory ECU. I've seen the same problem in the Subaru aftermarket too. Premature coil failure, misfire, erratic performance, etc., You might want to try running different dwell settings or contact AEM for other suggestions.

My 2c,
shiv

Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Nov 25, 2003 at 10:06 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 10:02 AM
  #17  
5StarSuzuki's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Penn State University
BTW: Buschur was having a misfire problem also...they are releasing some "kit" to fix it.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #18  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Shiv has better people skills.

Anyway, is that your daily tune for the EMS or was that just a rough tune and dyno pull?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 02:41 PM
  #19  
pjal84's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
From: Up to 80 miles north of Gilroy
I see all this talk about the ignition not working the way it should and I do wonder if the Mitsubishi setup is that fickle of a system. Does anyone know of any Mitsu car using the twin coil system where the ignition has been tweaked?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #20  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
As much as I hate to agree with Al, something does look to be amiss with the ignition system. However, it think it may have something to do with the way the AEM is charging the factory coils, not the coils themselves. This isn't unusual with stand alones/piggy-backs that attemp to charge the factory ignition coils. They often do so less well than the factory ECU. I've seen the same problem in the Subaru aftermarket too. Premature coil failure, misfire, erratic performance, etc., You might want to try running different dwell settings or contact AEM for other suggestions.

My 2c,
shiv
A point to why the majority, non race car, Evo owner would be better served with the OE ECU in place. I'm not taking a stab, slap, or in anyway "picking a fight". There are more con's than pro's to a stand alone on a car that gets grocerys and takes you to work daily.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 03:40 PM
  #21  
RnR Racing's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
I compeltly agree that the standalone is not for 95-99% of the EVO owners out there. I have tried several different stand alones over the years and agree that there can be a lot of driveablitly problems with them. Something you are not going to want on a brand new $30,000 car you drive daily.


RnR Racing with be sticking to the s-afc for a very simple tune that will provide plenty of security, driveability and power.

We also are looking to try the dynoflash along with the s-afc.


There are a lof od downsides the a stand alone that people don't realize.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 04:13 PM
  #22  
MMLVMM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: santa monica
I will start by reminding everyone what i said in the post:

This is not even close to done, btw....
I wanted to simply share the curious ignition issue...


As far as the power numbers etc. I am not even trying to get there yet. The main focus was to get an initial tune with good idle, drivability etc. We will make more power after we get the ignition upgraded... Any suggestions on using the aem vs. anything else?

On a final note, 403 whp at stock boost is what i thought was interesting.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 04:21 PM
  #23  
Evo11V's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 31
From: Tewksbury, NJ
Looks to me like a lot of up and down jerks in the power band... supposed to be almost smooth. Maybe you have a lot of detonation? You should look in to that before something serious goes wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 04:45 PM
  #24  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by Zeus


A point to why the majority, non race car, Evo owner would be better served with the OE ECU in place. I'm not taking a stab, slap, or in anyway "picking a fight". There are more con's than pro's to a stand alone on a car that gets grocerys and takes you to work daily.
Just to clarify, not all piggy-backs drive the factory coils. Some, ignition controlling piggy-backs like the XEDE, simply replicate the desired CAS waveform and pass it along to the OE ECU which then drives the coils just like stock.

Just in case my previous post wasn't clear..

My 2c,
shiv
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 05:15 PM
  #25  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu


Just to clarify, not all piggy-backs drive the factory coils. Some, ignition controlling piggy-backs like the XEDE, simply replicate the desired CAS waveform and pass it along to the OE ECU which then drives the coils just like stock.

Just in case my previous post wasn't clear..

My 2c,
shiv
Knowing that is why I stated that I was not trying to "start something" right after your post. I don't like piggy backs for my purposes, but I think I'd go that route with my grocery getter/kid hauler long before a stand alone system. Now for a "race car", the AEM sounds like the most user friendly option going...
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 05:15 PM
  #26  
Alfriedesq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 1
From: Stamford, CT
100% agreed with shiv's observations with stock coils and stand alones - noticed that Pruven had MSD ign and coils with its haltech equiped evo

The power band on a 400 whp evo whould look like this one tuned with just the dyno flash
Attached Thumbnails STOCK BOOST and 403 at the wheels...-perrindyno.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 05:55 PM
  #27  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally posted by gunzo
Hi there .. not looking for trouble or anything ..

But dynamic test systems dyno generates numbers at the flywheel .. not the usual numbers we're used to (ie dynojets, dyno dynamics, mustang etc) ..

Still for tuning .. its better than trying to figure out yourself

Good luck .. GT40 is a huge turbine

Well, Roshan from Brainstorm says that the way this particular dyno estimates flywheel horsepower adds about 18-20 hp from the wheel hp rating. It does this by figuring out approximate driveline loss thats different per car, instead of giving the same percentage loss for every car.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #28  
Fsmith's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
As for the jerky dyno pull, shiv has a good point as far as the coil dwell, aem usually sets this number high to get the most out
of the coils, but as the saying goes more is not allways better.
The aem base map has coil dwell at about 35-40, you might want
to try 28-30. I don't have my laptop in front of me, but If I remember corretly on john's car we set it at 30 and the curve was
pretty flat. An other thing you might want to do is datalog your
knock #1 & your knock raw values & see waht you come up with.
Last but not least check your plug gap. We usually try to run
a bit smaller gap like .026 if you don't have an aftermarket Ignition. You are definatly on the right track, just keep stabbing at it. Very impressive #'s . Good luck.

Frank@sfp
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #29  
evoego's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Dirty South
oops, yeah I agree the e-manage does the same to the coils as it will ctually burn them out if ignition is turned on without the car running,
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #30  
Alfriedesq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 1
From: Stamford, CT
Re: ignition and aem ems problems...

Originally posted by MMLVMM
Okay,

At least have the decency to post a usable dyno chart... rpm and hp/torque lamda is welcome too. mph and hp is bs. You can't even let anyone see how much power you are making at a given rpm...

Well the dyno I use has the tach pick up on order from Dyno Jet - hopefully the next sheet I post will have rpms - but no need to get your panties in a buncth - all my posts are in 3rd gear so you can easily calculate the rpms if you know 3rd gear

I usually do post the lamdas - at least I post up dyno sheets - unlike some others

Hope you get the ignition sorted out - at least I got Shiv to agree with me for once !
Attached Thumbnails STOCK BOOST and 403 at the wheels...-535.jpg  
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:21 PM.