Quote:
Mikey
nice was lookin on MAP's site at it they said it has harsh engaugment...im wondering how harsh because im going to have to daily drive it for a bitOriginally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
650-700tq I believe. I will have to double check. I don't think it is as high as a Exedy Triple.Mikey
Evolved Member
Quote:
Mikey
Yeah. I've been running the BR dual setup and it hasn't given me any issues at all. I've also been running the ID2000s, but I think I want to go down to a smaller inj. since I don't really need that much fuel. I want to continue to run stock bfp.Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
No I don't. The new style FIC 1450s are great and idle like stock. My base pressure is stock, only thing is I have two fuel pumps. The second has a boost activated switch. I will be doing dual in-tank pumps soon. The inline Walbro kinda scares me... Mikey
Evolved Member
Quote:
Ya the 1450s are fine. Some people are running the 1600s on bfp but I would go with 1450s if I were you. I'll swap you my 1450s for your 2000s? Originally Posted by lillev23
Yeah. I've been running the BR dual setup and it hasn't given me any issues at all. I've also been running the ID2000s, but I think I want to go down to a smaller inj. since I don't really need that much fuel. I want to continue to run stock bfp.
Mikey
Evolved Member
Quote:
Mikey
They're already sold and shipped bud. I wanted to try a set of the FIC 1680s (high imp.) out anyways. If a set of 2000cc inj. can idle on stock ecu, then the 1680s should run awesome.Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
Ya the 1450s are fine. Some people are running the 1600s on bfp but I would go with 1450s if I were you. I'll swap you my 1450s for your 2000s? Mikey
Quote:
what kind of numbers are you making on it?Originally Posted by still*boostn
10:1 comp, 32psi, 93 oct. 2.4 love it.
Evolved Member
10.3:1 (Calculated, 10:1 pistons with headwork & block milling brings it up slightly (Had to mill the block a bit due to when the block was shipped, there was a large nick in the top deck surface that needed to be taken out)
I can tell you, increasing the compression ratio was about the best mod I have done to the car as of yet. I was previously running 9.5:1's, and switched to 10:1's and must say it is a huge difference in driveability of the car. I have a seriously lightened rotating assembly and it makes the car so much easier to drive that way. Tilton twin disc, knife edged crank, no balance shafts, custom crank spacer, light (steel) rods etc. all lead to a motor with reduced rotating intertia, and it was difficult getting the car to catch itself (for idle). Compression helped out a lot to keep everything spinning, along with tuning it properly. I am still having difficulty in clutch dumping and letting the motor rev down to idle, blowing past the idle point and stalling out, but the compression helped out a lot.
In a nutshell, going to 10:1 pistons was about the best thing I did to the car as of yet.
I can tell you, increasing the compression ratio was about the best mod I have done to the car as of yet. I was previously running 9.5:1's, and switched to 10:1's and must say it is a huge difference in driveability of the car. I have a seriously lightened rotating assembly and it makes the car so much easier to drive that way. Tilton twin disc, knife edged crank, no balance shafts, custom crank spacer, light (steel) rods etc. all lead to a motor with reduced rotating intertia, and it was difficult getting the car to catch itself (for idle). Compression helped out a lot to keep everything spinning, along with tuning it properly. I am still having difficulty in clutch dumping and letting the motor rev down to idle, blowing past the idle point and stalling out, but the compression helped out a lot.
In a nutshell, going to 10:1 pistons was about the best thing I did to the car as of yet.
Evolving Member
10:1 buschur 2.0LR on 93 oct. Cant complain a bit about it. have not had any trouble with it. so far have put 3,000 miles on it over the last month.
Quote:
I can tell you, increasing the compression ratio was about the best mod I have done to the car as of yet. I was previously running 9.5:1's, and switched to 10:1's and must say it is a huge difference in driveability of the car. I have a seriously lightened rotating assembly and it makes the car so much easier to drive that way. Tilton twin disc, knife edged crank, no balance shafts, custom crank spacer, light (steel) rods etc. all lead to a motor with reduced rotating intertia, and it was difficult getting the car to catch itself (for idle). Compression helped out a lot to keep everything spinning, along with tuning it properly. I am still having difficulty in clutch dumping and letting the motor rev down to idle, blowing past the idle point and stalling out, but the compression helped out a lot.
In a nutshell, going to 10:1 pistons was about the best thing I did to the car as of yet.
Which rods did you use?. ..and are you using 93 oct on a regular basis? Did you by chance make a thread for your build? ThanxOriginally Posted by tkklemann
10.3:1 (Calculated, 10:1 pistons with headwork & block milling brings it up slightly (Had to mill the block a bit due to when the block was shipped, there was a large nick in the top deck surface that needed to be taken out)I can tell you, increasing the compression ratio was about the best mod I have done to the car as of yet. I was previously running 9.5:1's, and switched to 10:1's and must say it is a huge difference in driveability of the car. I have a seriously lightened rotating assembly and it makes the car so much easier to drive that way. Tilton twin disc, knife edged crank, no balance shafts, custom crank spacer, light (steel) rods etc. all lead to a motor with reduced rotating intertia, and it was difficult getting the car to catch itself (for idle). Compression helped out a lot to keep everything spinning, along with tuning it properly. I am still having difficulty in clutch dumping and letting the motor rev down to idle, blowing past the idle point and stalling out, but the compression helped out a lot.
In a nutshell, going to 10:1 pistons was about the best thing I did to the car as of yet.
thanks guys seems like its a pretty common thing.......does it make the car feel a little more responsive down low out of boost in your guys opinions?
Evolved Member
Yes, My 10.5:1 feels great! I'm sure a lot of the feel comes from the 2.4 since I have not driven a 9:1 2.4 to see the difference. My 10.5:1 MIVEC LR2.4 feels like a supercharged Viper ready to lay rubber... okay not quite but feels awesome!
Mikey
Mikey
Evolved Member
Good info guys. I have always heard that the higher comp motors feel better on the street, can't wait to drive one.
anybody with a 2.0 with 10:1 with an opinion on responsiveness down low outside of boost? the 2.4 got the extra torque so thats a no brainer lol
great cant wait to feel the difference between my stock motor and my fully built one