Twin HKS BOVs and turbo in

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 11, 2003 | 11:54 PM

#61

value

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 2,777

Likes: 1

From: Evergreen state

Ahhh Haven't seen the nifty Fcon navigator which allows you to make tuning changes without a laptop right from the drivers seat. Works with the F con V Pro, F con S and the New F con SZ

Dec 12, 2003 | 12:06 AM

#62

m3mark

Newbie

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 36

Likes: 0

From: NJ

Man that is one serious evo!! I cant wait for some sound clips of that beast....

Dec 12, 2003 | 01:29 AM

#63

r6bruin

Evolving Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 155

Likes: 1

From: Bay Area, California

Quote:

Originally posted by Boost Solutions

Your better choice, especially if you are building the car, is to go with a standalone engine management. In that case, you just take out your stock ECU, and put in a different ECU ( standalone) that YOU can control with laptop. All SA ECUs work with MAP sensors, and they provide teh ultimate in tuning ability. They are way better than any S-AFC, e-manage, Xede, Dynoflash, etc.
George

Ouch... too bad it's a bit too late since I already got S-AFC installed. Should have wait longer 'til all these goodies come out...

Thanks anyway for the info

Dec 12, 2003 | 01:38 AM

#64

Turboholic

Evolving Member

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 298

Likes: 0

From: Chicago

what's up, Geoge, this is Ben.

just wondering what manifold you put in with that T51?
do they sell it with kit for evo already?
let me know if u put on any special.
-Ben

Last edited by Turboholic; Dec 12, 2003 at 01:47 AM.

Dec 12, 2003 | 12:00 PM

#65

ItsStockOfficer

Evolving Member

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 369

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by r6bruin

Ouch... too bad it's a bit too late since I already got S-AFC installed. Should have wait longer 'til all these goodies come out...

Thanks anyway for the info

Take it from someone who has used both standalones and piggy backs on a 400+ whp 4G63.

Nothing wrong with an safc for the typical tuner. Easy to use, effective, cheap. I like them alot, they get the job done nicely. Standlones are awesome, versatile and powerful....but they are also a much larger investment of your time to tune and use. You will be tuing the SAFC on your way to work for fun within a week.

Dec 12, 2003 | 01:52 PM

#66

r6bruin

Evolving Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 155

Likes: 1

From: Bay Area, California

Quote:

Originally posted by ItsStockOfficer

Take it from someone who has used both standalones and piggy backs on a 400+ whp 4G63.

Nothing wrong with an safc for the typical tuner. Easy to use, effective, cheap. I like them alot, they get the job done nicely. Standlones are awesome, versatile and powerful....but they are also a much larger investment of your time to tune and use. You will be tuing the SAFC on your way to work for fun within a week.

That's true, except that SAFC cannot address the BOV's stalling issue. Otherwise I'm totally with you, especially the flexibility

By the way, I'm going to take the car for dyno-tune next week, any idea what I need to aware of during the tuning?

Thanks!