Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

HFC Cat cell count information - A little exhaust flow calculation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 08:33 PM
  #1  
domyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
HFC Cat cell count information - A little exhaust flow calculation

fail (delete )

Last edited by domyz; Nov 27, 2012 at 03:22 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 09:00 PM
  #2  
edogg23's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: WA South Sound
Why not just go with the milspec to begin with?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 09:37 PM
  #3  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
You are ignoring boundary layer effects which are significant. The less surface area esposed to airflow, the better for pressure drop.

I can say this, I went 91.5mph in the 1/8 with my mil.spec cat on, and 92mph with it off. I am running the speed density patch and I noticed no observable change in AFR or boost. The mil.spec cat works very well on my car which is in the 350WHP range.

I have no idea if it works as well as other HFC for cleaning up the exhaust but it works well enough that it kills the terrible smell of a cat-less 4G63.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 09:41 PM
  #4  
domyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Yes, this is just a very quick calculation, boundary layer effect is what cell count affect, but this is not really what I meant to talk about; I didn't compare or calculate flow vs cell count.
I just wanted illustrate the importance to have a 3 inch cat, which negate some of the effect of a high cell count cat.



The milspec cost a lot , isn't 100% sure to pass smog and smell a little. I didn't start with that for these reasons.

Last edited by domyz; Apr 13, 2011 at 09:46 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 09:46 PM
  #5  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
$150 for something that kills the smell and keeps the power seems reasonable?

I don't run my car all that rich, but it definitely kills the smell in the car. It might still smell horrible from behind, but it doesn't get that horrible cloud of **** smell engulfing the car as you pull up to a stop light.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 10:40 PM
  #6  
edogg23's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: WA South Sound
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
You are ignoring boundary layer effects which are significant. The less surface area esposed to airflow, the better for pressure drop.

I can say this, I went 91.5mph in the 1/8 with my mil.spec cat on, and 92mph with it off. I am running the speed density patch and I noticed no observable change in AFR or boost. The mil.spec cat works very well on my car which is in the 350WHP range.

I have no idea if it works as well as other HFC for cleaning up the exhaust but it works well enough that it kills the terrible smell of a cat-less 4G63.
Yeah I am very happy with my mil.spec cat too. It doesn't smell bad and it made great power on the dyno.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 10:59 PM
  #7  
domyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
$150 for something that kills the smell and keeps the power seems reasonable?

I don't run my car all that rich, but it definitely kills the smell in the car. It might still smell horrible from behind, but it doesn't get that horrible cloud of **** smell engulfing the car as you pull up to a stop light.
It is okay for you, i'm happy that you don't bother the smell out of your exhaust, this is your choice. Some people want something odorless.
It's all about finding where you are between a test pipe and 5 cat converters in a row. All the opinions are okay.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #8  
edogg23's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: WA South Sound
Originally Posted by domyz
Yes, this is just a very quick calculation, boundary layer effect is what cell count affect, but this is not really what I meant to talk about; I didn't compare or calculate flow vs cell count.
I just wanted illustrate the importance to have a 3 inch cat, which negate some of the effect of a high cell count cat.



The milspec cost a lot , isn't 100% sure to pass smog and smell a little. I didn't start with that for these reasons.
Yeah I am sure any high flow cat has to be better than the stock unit!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 04:15 PM
  #9  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by domyz
The milspec cost a lot , isn't 100% sure to pass smog and smell a little. I didn't start with that for these reasons.
Define "A lot." HJS cats from Germany cost $600. Random Tech units, last time I checked, were like ~$230 retail. Our cats, made entirely in the US (both core and housing), manufactured in an ISO/TS 16949:2002 approved facility retail for $179.

Most of the other metal cats I have seen have Chinese made cores. Our cats also have high-quality PGM coatings. I'm not sure how you quantify or qualify "smell a little" with our cats. Do you have direct experience with them? My smell-o-meter detects no noticeable smell from my MIL.SPEC cat. Then again, maybe my nose wasn't properly calibrated.

People have passed smog using our cats. Of course, we make no claims regarding smog...it's dependent on so many things: tune, cams, etc. If you are really that concerned about smog, we can source 200 cell cats that are EPA approved in 49 states.

Also, here is a little flow data chart for you. It's off a SuperFLow 600, and we maxed out the machine way before we hit 28* of water


Last edited by Erik@MIL.SPEC; Apr 15, 2011 at 11:49 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 11:24 PM
  #10  
Toxin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Way ahead...
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
Define "A lot." HJS cats from Germany cost $600. Random Tech units, last time I checked, were like ~$230 retail. Our cats, made entirely in the US (both core and housing), manufactured in an ISO/TS 16949:2002 approved facility retail for $179.
HJS is TÜV approved, has Group N FIA homologation and is just about the only cat used by rally cars throughout Europe, and apart from that, will pass emissions to, at least for a year anyway. Hence - the price.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 11:45 PM
  #11  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Toxin
HJS is TÜV approved, has Group N FIA homologation and is just about the only cat used by rally cars throughout Europe, and apart from that, will pass emissions too, at least for a year anyway. Hence - the price.
Yes. I wasn't knocking HJS. The OP was complaining about the price of our cats, and I was trying to illustrate that our cats aren't expensive if you're looking for a quality cat. HJS makes a top-quality product...which is supported by their price point.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goforwand
For Sale - Suspension / Brakes / Handling
6
Dec 29, 2013 07:47 PM
kpt6
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
17
Jul 31, 2013 01:14 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 AM.