Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

HTA Green DBB testing at English Racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2011 | 10:18 PM
  #76  
dtrackstar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 2
From: U.S of A
Any updates?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2011 | 02:51 PM
  #77  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by dtrackstar
Any updates?
None to report. The only mods that will make more power are bigger cams and a different intake manifold. That wont happen for a few reasons-

1- Car is a road race setup now so balance between response and peak power is more important. Luke races around 23-24psi on E85, 445-450whp nominal.

2- Luke wont be running Q16 at any event (534/514 was on Q) either.

3- Parts cost money even for shops. We put the car together for Luke with all the spares in the shop that we couldnt sell. S1s are smaller than most of our customers want and we have a bunch of stock intake manifolds.

This turbo is definitely capable of more, we just wont be the ones to push it to the limit. I believe Curt Brown made 570+ on it on a large spike though. He uses E85, ER SD tuning, S3s, BR2.3RPM (10:1), Skunk2 Intake, and I want to say a 39psi spike.

Aaron
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2011 | 04:46 PM
  #78  
dtrackstar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 2
From: U.S of A
I thought Curt's numbers were on the non BB version?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2011 | 05:57 PM
  #79  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by dtrackstar
I thought Curt's numbers were on the non BB version?
they are.
Going to BB should not change top end power or boost threshold, only transient response and durability.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2011 | 06:30 PM
  #80  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by dtrackstar
I thought Curt's numbers were on the non BB version?
Originally Posted by RSMike
they are.
Going to BB should not change top end power or boost threshold, only transient response and durability.
exactly
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2011 | 12:11 AM
  #81  
dtrackstar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 2
From: U.S of A
Thank you!
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2011 | 09:26 PM
  #82  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by RSMike
they are.
Going to BB should not change top end power or boost threshold, only transient response and durability.
Assuming that the BB user does not spin it another 20,000 RPM higher than the journal bearing version
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 07:30 AM
  #83  
BlackOpsEvo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Any updates?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 10:18 AM
  #84  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Luke put 202 track miles on it in one day and its still kicking
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 06:04 PM
  #85  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
even considering response, isnt 23-24 psi pretty low? i ran 25psi on the stocker
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #86  
Benja's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, Australia.
Did you run the stocker at 25psi for 15mins straight in 4/5/6th gears?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #87  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by kyoo
even considering response, isnt 23-24 psi pretty low? i ran 25psi on the stocker
24psi is 448+whp which is more than enough for a track car on 255s. I know that your 25psi on the stocker wasnt close to that. We still have the traction issue of the 448whp AND the heatload to deal with for a full lapping session.


Originally Posted by Benja
Did you run the stocker at 25psi for 15mins straight in 4/5/6th gears?
20 min sessions

I know what you mean though

Aaron
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 09:59 PM
  #88  
Benja's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, Australia.
Yep, no way you want it even close to max efficiency zone for road-racing.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 05:17 AM
  #89  
BlackOpsEvo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Do you have to run FPs oil line with this new turbo? I know you need it for the red and black
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 08:38 AM
  #90  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
We did on this one as well, Robert was very insistent on that.

Aaron
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 PM.