Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.4 long rods??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 03:25 AM
  #1  
evoyrrah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: australia
2.4 long rods??

Is rue you can get 159mm long rods for the 64? If so, which pistons suit them? Would it be ideal having such a small piston? I'd like to where I could get my hands on this combo for my next build
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 06:17 AM
  #2  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
156mm is pretty much the longest you want to go.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 08:50 AM
  #3  
jonzie04's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: MO
you can get 159mm rods. can also get 162mm rods... but they would require an expensive crank and pistons.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 09:59 AM
  #4  
NewEvolutionIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Olmsted Falls, OH
Im building a 2.4LR with Manley 156mm rods and Weisco 10.5:1 87mm pistons
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 11:37 AM
  #5  
MikeB@FFTEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 1
From: Union City
We typically use off the shelf 156mm rods.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #6  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by evoyrrah
Is rue you can get 159mm long rods for the 64? If so, which pistons suit them? Would it be ideal having such a small piston? I'd like to where I could get my hands on this combo for my next build
Are you trying to build a LR2.4 or just use the 4G64 block and build a different displacement?

Aaron
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 08:07 PM
  #7  
burnzy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
at 2.4 156 is the most you really want to go, thats with the pin already moved up 6mm, same as a stroker style 2.3 piston, taking another 3mm off the crown to wristpin area i'd be wary about, if in fact even possible at normal compression ratios.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 08:18 PM
  #8  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by burnzy
at 2.4 156 is the most you really want to go, thats with the pin already moved up 6mm, same as a stroker style 2.3 piston, taking another 3mm off the crown to wristpin area i'd be wary about, if in fact even possible at normal compression ratios.
Steel rod only and it gets close with a 10:1.

I used that compression height in my 2.2 (in this case 25.7mm) with R&R and I had to machine the piston a little to make it fit. The JE I used at that time still had 8mm of crown thickness in the 10:1 and according to manufacturers I have talked to since, 6.5mm is the bare minimum. I would think it would mean you'd want a 10.5:1 or 11:1 piston to make it work right and have some peace of mind. In retrospect we'd never build a motor like that again, the 8mm of thickness above the pin on the rod at that compression height didnt work well. A steel rod would have added back what I needed most likely though I dont know the difference in measurement off the top of my head. I will find out though tomorrow.

aaron
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 08:22 PM
  #9  
burnzy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
159 with 10.5 would be ideal on e85, our e85 in australia isn't very stable and as such people are a bit weary of having to be stuck with e85 to get most performance from a high comp engine. at 9:1 it would be under the 6.5 limit wouldnt' it?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 08:25 PM
  #10  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by burnzy
159 with 10.5 would be ideal on e85, our e85 in australia isn't very stable and as such people are a bit weary of having to be stuck with e85 to get most performance from a high comp engine. at 9:1 it would be under the 6.5 limit wouldnt' it?
Agreed.

Yeah the dish would interfere I think. A 9:1 156mm is good to go however
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 01:06 PM
  #11  
craigybaby37's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: UK
You can get 162mm rods if you want to de-stroke the 4g64 bloks and have a super long rod 2.1 revving to 9k plus

Here is a thread from MLR taking about the 2.1 long rod using 162mm rods, 87mm pistons and a 88mm stroke crank on the 4g64 block.

http://www.lancerregister.com/showth...super+long+rod
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #12  
OsideEVO's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside
Im look for piston for my 2.4 LR. 156rods. Heard of few people using stroker pistion. Is that the correct way or is there a company that makes LR pistons .
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 09:11 AM
  #13  
bader's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: howell,MI
What pistons would you use for a 2.4l with 100mm crank and 156mm rod.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 10:16 AM
  #14  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
does anyone have a shelf stock 153mm or 159mm rod?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 10:23 AM
  #15  
izabran's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY!!!
Originally Posted by bader
What pistons would you use for a 2.4l with 100mm crank and 156mm rod.
i need the answer as well
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 PM.