Well yeah it would need to be 3786 vs 6466 to be fair, I think a 3586 can make 830 with the right setup.

 

I'm sure I don't have the right set up

I guess we will see where it leaves me.

 

If I hadn't purchased either one yet, I would get the 6466, I too have heard nothing but good things about it.

 

Because the guy next to you might have 699 to 799 hp. Duh

On a serious note the 6466 is a bad *** street turbo. Basically the same thing as the HTA turbo or 6262. All 3 spoolup about the same and the 6466 makes more topend then the other 2 turbos.

 

Alot of it is having it in the correct housing I think, the whole reason that the 3794 wasnt as exciting as it was is it was corked. If I could get in a larger housing than the 1.15 I think I would now go larger.

 

How laggy do you think a 3786 would be compared to a 3586.

 

In a twin scroll I dont think it would be any laggier. Based on what I saw between my 3586 and 3794 on the street or dyno with load, I dont expect there'd be much loss at all.

 

Do you guys plan on getting one of those new FP turbos to test anytime soon?

 

I believe they make a 1.32 for that turbine wheel size

 

I am extremely tempted to get one for my car but I promised myself that I had a limit on it the way it sits. We'll see

Dan, a 1.32 is tempting.

Aaron

 

i know i changed the hole turbo and cams but trapping 151 in a street car seems to tell me i no longer have a back pressure issue with the 1.15 housing.

i bought the 1.15 and also ported the crap out of it. i think the 66mm turbine wheel and the bigger housing made a huge difference. give it a try with the 3786 turbo. i am sure the results will be the same.

 

So do you think a 3794 would be more laggier than the 6466?

 

What is the" right set up" make 800-830 on the 3586? Has there been any information gathered about the 3786 as a comparison to the 3586?

 

Tial 1.03 V band, maybe not even that.

Its beating a deadhorse, and worse is benchracing, but here is my car back to back pulls on the 3794, 3rd and 4th gear-



Here is a 3rd gear 3586 same motor no other changes other than the turbo -



Had I realised I needed the load from 4th gear so desperately I would have dyno'd the 3586 in 4th as well. Based on what Buschur has seen, I would presume my car was well over 800 in 4th and really probably in the 820-830 range.

It was the same LR2.4, ER head, R2 cams, etc. that its always been. Both turbos had a 0.82 A/r T3 ballistic housing. The 86 was a 2.5" 4 bolt going to an immediate 3" downpipe, the 94 was a 3" V band going to the same downpipe.

A tuned a Tial V band equipped 3586 on another LR2.4 with S3s (all the mods were more or less the same) that made 762@32psi in 3rd where my car made 746. I think just the better housing would push the car over 800 in 3rd and undoubtedly higher in 4th with the load added in.

 

86 to 6466 lag shoud not be 200-400rpm