Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Help choosing a turbo for a DD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 01:52 PM
  #16  
Z06Samuel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: vallejo
I will be tuning on a mustang dyno.
Thanks again guys,
Sam
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 02:24 PM
  #17  
fastyouth1313's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
To be honest, you should worry about drivability/reliability. Not just numbers. Numbers are just a tool used for tuning.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 03:47 PM
  #18  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Probably to reach that 400 Mustang number on straight 91 octane pump gas, you'll need either the HTA Green, or a BBK-B. If your in CA you'll also probably want it configured with the stock Mitsu compressor housing, as opposed to one of the surge ported, larger mouthed, compressor covers.

Either of the two above turbos spools up relatively well. But if you must have absolute stock like spool then you'll have to get the BB version of either. These turbos will get you up to and above 400.

Another option is one of the MAP turbos. I don't know which of the two EF-2, or EF-3 is equivalent to a BBK-B/HTA green though.

These turbos are all pretty driveable. Hell I have a JB Red and it is pretty driveable. So, either of the above turbos will outspool my Red. Curt Brown flatly states that the Green is the absolute best street stock appearing turbo. A lot of California peeps, especially in the Bay Area prefer the CBRD turbos though.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 03:54 PM
  #19  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Sam: Why do you want to limit yourself with 91 octane fuel anyway? I know that there is E-85 in Hayward and down in Redwood City. Don't you have it available closer to you.

If you run Ethanol then you can easily reach 400 Mustang with a smaller turbo such as the BBK-Full. Just have switchable E-85/91 tunes and you are set.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 04:43 PM
  #20  
Z06Samuel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: vallejo
I really have thought about the E85 route but there really is no station near my location. I am looking at 400 whp as a figure so I don't push to hard on the stock block (I am conservative). The stock frame turbos are most tempting as I really don't want to pull the turbo/manifold every two years or risk getting sent to the state ref.
Thank you guys this is all very helpful,
Sam
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 05:07 PM
  #21  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
If you are worried about the integrity of the stock bottom end then you should know that turbos such as the BBK-Full and the HTA Green are great torque producers on pump gas. Torque is what pops bottom ends...not horsepower.

It is easier probably to keep the bottom end together with a bit larger turbo such as the Red or a BBK-B than with either the Green or the BBK-Full. Generally, you'll produce higher peak power numbers with a Red or a BBK-B, than you will with either a BBK-Full or a Green but less torque.

If you have a really good tuner he should be able to limit the midrange torque on either the Green or the Full though.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 09:57 PM
  #22  
golgo13's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (134)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 29
From: @ a track near you
Torque is what moves the car though, not sure I understand the benefit of having a car with a high peak horsepower number and a mediocre torque number?



FWIW, Chad has told me to get the most out of the BBK-B you want to run more boost than what he recommends for the BBK-Full, which is over 30 PSI. You just can't reliably make power on 91 at that pressure, so E-85 is the only option.


Last edited by golgo13; Sep 2, 2012 at 11:28 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 10:44 PM
  #23  
Craig King's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: NW Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by scheides
Depends on the dyno--I'm surprised nobody has mentioned or asked which he is talking about
I thought it was pretty much assumed that the only REAL dyno is a mustang dyno???


Sure... if I wanted to brag about my dyno numbers, I would find a dynojet.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 11:43 PM
  #24  
hokutanm's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington
Worthy of the Pie Name.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 02:27 AM
  #25  
Pure EvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, CA
I heart my E85 + BBK Full. 385whp/339 (MD) on 91 at 25psi and 452whp/384wtq (MD) on E85 at 28.5psi. I beat the **** out of it on the track.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 07:56 AM
  #26  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by golgo13
......FWIW, Chad has told me to get the most out of the BBK-B you want to run more boost than what he recommends for the BBK-Full, which is over 30 PSI. You just can't reliably make power on 91 at that pressure...:
But, even out of its sweet spot at 25# the BBK-B will produce considerably more power than the BBK-Full. Well over 400 WHP is doable with the "B" at 25# but not with the Full.

That fellow in Hawaii got over 420 Dynojet(?) on 92 octane at 26 PSI. So, to achieve 400 on pump there is no need to boost over 30# with the "B". 400 is doable with the "B" on 91 at 25#. Not easily doable with the Full.

I think that Bryan at GST got about 403 MD out of a stockblock Full though didn't he? So, I guess that it is not impossible. I am not downplaying the Full. It is probably the best bolton pumpgas turbo. Just look at what Evolutionary has done on his race car with a Full and a stock block.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 08:08 AM
  #27  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by Z06Samuel
Hello guys,

Looking to make 400 whp max (cams and supporting mods on 91 octane) and have a close to stock spool for the street. I am looking at either a full ported BBK or ported FP Green. Any help or other recomendations with be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,
Sam
The EF2 has done 400+ Dynojet with 93 octane, you would have to go EF3 for 400whp on a Mustang and even that might be tough on 91 octane. Assuming 18% correction to get to DJ numbers we're talking about 470+whp, wouldn't that be tough for any of the turbos mentioned on 91 octane?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 09:54 AM
  #28  
golgo13's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (134)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 29
From: @ a track near you
Originally Posted by sparky
But, even out of its sweet spot at 25# the BBK-B will produce considerably more power than the BBK-Full. Well over 400 WHP is doable with the "B" at 25# but not with the Full.

That fellow in Hawaii got over 420 Dynojet(?) on 92 octane at 26 PSI. So, to achieve 400 on pump there is no need to boost over 30# with the "B". 400 is doable with the "B" on 91 at 25#. Not easily doable with the Full.

I think that Bryan at GST got about 403 MD out of a stockblock Full though didn't he? So, I guess that it is not impossible. I am not downplaying the Full. It is probably the best bolton pumpgas turbo. Just look at what Evolutionary has done on his race car with a Full and a stock block.
Very cool.

Here's what Chad had to say about it a while back (sent via email):
Originally Posted by Chad Block
The BBK Full is still my choice for 90% of our clients that want stock like response and excellent peak power- plus its biggest benefit is running the stock bearing package which doesn’t require special oils etc-
If you aren’t running over 30psi- the BBK full is stronger-
Normal psi range on pump gas would be 24-27 psi-
Much over thatyoull need E85 or race fuel to support it without detonation!
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 04:27 PM
  #29  
Z06Samuel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: vallejo
Thank you guys, you all have given me a wealth of info!
I already have an 3.5" intercooler, nisei uicp/licp, fuelpump, buschur intake and full exhaust no cat.
My plan is:
BBK Full - Ported Exhaust manifold - Some brand O2 housing - valve springs - 272 Kelford cams - APR head studs - Some brand 1200cc injectors - I will dual tune for E85and 91. When I move, I will make sure E85 is nearby

Sam
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 04:50 PM
  #30  
golgo13's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (134)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 29
From: @ a track near you
Looks like a good set-up, I can't comment on the MAP turbos because they came out after I had already made my purchase. There are quite a few of them on the boards though, so you may want to look into them a bit further.

As far as O2 I went with a Titek V2 stainless, but Chad prefers the latest from Invidia.

Originally Posted by CBRD
we typically use the newer version invidia which we really like--

did some preliminary testing today- and at the same boost pressures- it was about even- with the exception that it was 26 degrees warmer today than when we tested the invidia setup last--- which usually is about a 10whp difference---

one thing we did notice- we had to run slightly more WGDC up top- meaning there was less back pressure at the flapper allowing it open easier- which is what we were trying to achieve-

cb
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_des_
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
0
Apr 4, 2017 01:47 PM
nikush
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
2
Mar 10, 2017 01:59 PM
Cruza
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
1
Mar 9, 2017 04:29 PM
BoneEvo9
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
4
Aug 9, 2015 01:16 AM
Skim003
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
87
Jun 18, 2008 01:52 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:14 PM.