Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Torn Between Turbos :(. Please Advise...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 07:51 AM
  #16  
ToddRhodes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 347
Likes: 3
From: South Bend, IN
Based on the comments above, since it seems like you want more spool than topend, it looks like the BBK Full is a good fit. With that said, you could just as easily pick any of the three at random and be completely happy. They aren't *that* different.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 08:00 AM
  #17  
icmanevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: California
Id lean tward BBK Full just because of what you do with the car. Daily driven.. highway miles ect. fast spool and reliability seem like top priorities. But then again like everyone has said all three turbos should give you that. Im trying to pick between the same setups... let us know what you decide and how you like it.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 08:17 AM
  #18  
ToddRhodes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 347
Likes: 3
From: South Bend, IN
Originally Posted by icmanevo
Id lean tward BBK Full just because of what you do with the car. Daily driven.. highway miles ect. fast spool and reliability seem like top priorities. But then again like everyone has said all three turbos should give you that. Im trying to pick between the same setups... let us know what you decide and how you like it.
I don't think OP has an IX but I see you do - I'd also give some thought to the HTA71 upgrade. For the money, it can't be beat. $650 and you get about 95% of the Green and Full. It won't do 500 awhp but on E85 it can get up past 450. I only have VD to go by but mine's at 399 on 93 octane with just the mods in my sig, 25 psi. Spools fast as **** and just makes for a great overall powerband. VD graph is solid past 7500 RPM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2012 | 06:38 AM
  #19  
STWHY?'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 234
Likes: 1
From: Old Lyme CT
Green....I love mine...
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2012 | 01:08 PM
  #20  
killercd4G63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, Ga
I'm really looking for longevity in the turbo and if it ever does give out it won't cost me another turbo to replace it... Hence why i didn't say
"FP Green BB"
"BBK BB"

Forgot to mention my throttle body is currently a Full Blown 70mm which is going back to a stock Throttle body size.

Originally Posted by golgo13
I'm not seeing the problem with your post. What's wrong with your current turbo? It's hard to suggest solutions to a problem we can't see.
Sorry about that...
The Problem is the 3586r takes too long for spool up... Too big really...

Originally Posted by itsmrrizz2you
Fp green tuned by Mellon on my car 455 whp 415 tq 27 psi 93oct super fast spooling what more do u need
What all are you supporting modifications and at what psi?

Originally Posted by itsmrrizz2you
Stock motor manis and drive train act street disk clutch
i don't understand what you typed...

Originally Posted by 5LEEPERISAH23I
id just get a bbk full ported and a 93 oct tuned you would sit around 420-450.. the think the BBK turbo's have proven themselves for yours now and you cant go wrong with it. Me personnally im a FP guy so i say FP green
I'm confused by your statement lol
You recommend the BBK and the Green HTA?

Originally Posted by blackenedwings
OP, your needs are pretty much dead on what the BBK-Full delivers.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...k-full-sd.html
Thanks for the link... I'm about 60% BBK, 30% HTA Green & 10% Map's EF2

Originally Posted by Blitz
Another vote for BBK full. Mine did 420 whp on a dyonjet with similar mods/93 octane. Not one issue in all the time I've had it. Sounds like what you want.
Thanks Blitz. I like to run it on a Mustang Dyno rather than a Typical Dynojet.

Originally Posted by 8UpUrV8
They all sound pretty solid. I would also look into cost of rebuild if you go Journal Bearing, I believe MAP is very affordable..
Yeah, That's why i want a Journal, i know the spool of a Ball Bearing is constant and helps in other areas as well but the reliability and rebuild rate is what keeps me away. Granted mine has never given me problems, i just don't like what RPMS it decides to push.

Originally Posted by RallyRedMR
BBK for sure. check out the bbk-b ball bearing
Thanks but i'll pass on the ball bearings.

Originally Posted by jaysonsyl
I had both bbk full and Hta green I would go with the green!
Thanks Jay.

Originally Posted by TJ03VIII
Yep...I would go for the HTA Green
Thanks TJ

Originally Posted by kaonashi
I'll take that ets 3586 off your hands
It will be for Sale, BUT
I'm selling the Unit as a WHOLE meaning (Turbo, Turbo Manifold, WG, LICP, DP) Basically The Entire Kit From ETS minus the Slim Fan

Originally Posted by EvocentriK
BBK Full will outspool a green. Green will have more top end than the BBK. EF2 I just don't like that much, seems a bit el cheapo but pulls decent numbers I guess, just don't know about long term use.
from others reviews it seems that the BBK is going to be my situation

Originally Posted by scheides
Any of the above turbos would be perfect for a stock block setup. All of them are so close it's tough to decide. All are small enough wheels that the factory-style turbo center-section/bearing setup is used and they just seem to last forever.

I put 20k miles (@30psi) on my BBK and mrfred is still rocking it making fantastic power, it's hard for me not to recommend that thing as it is just a champ!

I've seen great numbers and reliability out of one local particular FP HTAGreen (73HTA) but not sure what others experience has been.

Lots of guys running EF2's around here now and they are making fantastic power too and they seem just as tough.

Good luck in your decision!
Exactly how i feel LOL
i really want longevity in the turbo

Originally Posted by Mellon Racing
yep, all of those turbos will do the job. Pick your favorite manufacture and get to enjoying your quick spool again
lol it's like you know what i'm going through right now... No spool
I'll be contacting You soon enough
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #21  
killercd4G63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, Ga
Originally Posted by ToddRhodes
Based on the comments above, since it seems like you want more spool than topend, it looks like the BBK Full is a good fit. With that said, you could just as easily pick any of the three at random and be completely happy. They aren't *that* different.
Yes Sir I Do. I didn't think they were too much different either, i just wanted some friendly Advice.
Thanks Todd.

Originally Posted by icmanevo
Id lean tward BBK Full just because of what you do with the car. Daily driven.. highway miles ect. fast spool and reliability seem like top priorities. But then again like everyone has said all three turbos should give you that. Im trying to pick between the same setups... let us know what you decide and how you like it.
I most defiantly will.

Originally Posted by ToddRhodes
I don't think OP has an IX but I see you do - I'd also give some thought to the HTA71 upgrade. For the money, it can't be beat. $650 and you get about 95% of the Green and Full. It won't do 500 awhp but on E85 it can get up past 450. I only have VD to go by but mine's at 399 on 93 octane with just the mods in my sig, 25 psi. Spools fast as **** and just makes for a great overall powerband. VD graph is solid past 7500 RPM.
I don't have a IX Turbo, i USE to on my 03, Loved it till the higher RPMS (I've never went past 7,000 rpm... Seriously. The only time my motor has seen that while I've own it was when it was being tuned on the Dynojet by the Tuner.

Originally Posted by STWHY?
Green....I love mine...
Seems like everyone does.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2012 | 06:51 PM
  #22  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
Ball bearing turbos are more reliable. No if and or but about it.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 08:51 AM
  #23  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
With larger wheels (FP Black, EF4, etc.) I would tend to agree with the above statement, but in this scenario comparing the smaller stock frame variations, ball bearing vs journal bearing is irrelevant from my experience. Remember, stock turbos are journal bearing and have been known to last quite some time

OP: I would love the opportunity to earn your business, if you're not concerned with ball bearing I believe our EF2 turbocharger to be the perfect option for you. Stock like spool with the capability of putting down 400+whp on 93 octane. 30 day satisfaction guarantee, one year warranty, and we're significantly cheaper
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 08:58 AM
  #24  
Tarmac Meister's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I've seen the BBK Full put in work. I would get that on a IX for sure.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 10:08 AM
  #25  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by killercd4G63
I'm really looking for longevity in the turbo and if it ever does give out it won't cost me another turbo to replace it... Hence why i didn't say
"FP Green BB"....."BBK BB"... I'm about 60% BBK....That's why i want a Journal, i know the spool of a Ball Bearing is constant and helps in other areas as well but the reliability and rebuild rate is what keeps me away.... i'll pass on the ball bearings......from others reviews it seems that the BBK is going to be my situation...i really want longevity in the turbo ....
Let's get a few things straight. There seems to be a misconception regarding ball bearing vs. journal bearing turbos.

First, it is an established and widely accepted fact that ball bearing center sections in general afford improved longevity in comparison to journal bearing center sections in turbochargers. Improved longevity results in improved reliability and reduced repair intervals. Are you arguing against this?

Likewise, turbocharger spool-up, rate of spool, and transient response. All else remaining equal, a ball bearing fitted turbocharger will out spool, have a quicker rate of spool, and improved transient response characteristics in comparison to the same turbocharger fitted with journal bearings. Are you not in agreement with this statement?

The CBRD BBK turbo in journal bearing form has proven to be an exceptionally durable and dependable turbocharger. Most CBRD customers purchase the BBK in its original JB format. However, if you should happen to want it even quicker spooling and longer lasting, then CBRD will fit the BBK with a ball bearing center section.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 10:15 AM
  #26  
Wicked_White10's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, MN
Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
With larger wheels (FP Black, EF4, etc.) I would tend to agree with the above statement, but in this scenario comparing the smaller stock frame variations, ball bearing vs journal bearing is irrelevant from my experience. Remember, stock turbos are journal bearing and have been known to last quite some time

OP: I would love the opportunity to earn your business, if you're not concerned with ball bearing I believe our EF2 turbocharger to be the perfect option for you. Stock like spool with the capability of putting down 400+whp on 93 octane. 30 day satisfaction guarantee, one year warranty, and we're significantly cheaper
I have heard nothing but good things about the EF2. Great power, and not too hard on the wallet either. I back up Chris. MAP has a great product.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 12:25 PM
  #27  
golgo13's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (134)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 29
From: @ a track near you
Originally Posted by sparky
let's get a few things straight. There seems to be a misconception regarding ball bearing vs. Journal bearing turbos.

First, it is an established and widely accepted fact that ball bearing center sections in general afford improved longevity in comparison to journal bearing center sections in turbochargers. Improved longevity results in improved reliability and reduced repair intervals. Are you arguing against this?

Likewise, turbocharger spool-up, rate of spool, and transient response. All else remaining equal, a ball bearing fitted turbocharger will out spool, have a quicker rate of spool, and improved transient response characteristics in comparison to the same turbocharger fitted with journal bearings. Are you not in agreement with this statement?

The cbrd bbk turbo in journal bearing form has proven to be an exceptionally durable and dependable turbocharger. Most cbrd customers purchase the bbk in its original jb format. However, if you should happen to want it even quicker spooling and longer lasting, then cbrd will fit the bbk with a ball bearing center section.
+1
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 01:45 PM
  #28  
4RETECH's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (86)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 12
From: Orange/Rockland, NY
I would just like to say as per longevity........

evo unknown is running my ported BBK-full JB I sold him. When it was sold to him it had ~57,000 miles on it from me. We sent it to CBRD to get a once over before installing it into his car, nothing was wrong with it.

That turbo is still doing fine
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 01:55 PM
  #29  
evo unknown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 1
From: Orange County, NY
Originally Posted by 4RETECH
I would just like to say as per longevity........

evo unknown is running my ported BBK-full JB I sold him. When it was sold to him it had ~57,000 miles on it from me. We sent it to CBRD to get a once over before installing it into his car, nothing was wrong with it.

That turbo is still doing fine
...Now it has about 65k miles on the CBRD JB BBK-Full. Zero shaft play and has ran 30psi its whole life.

Incredible spool, 400+awhp easily on 93, and this thing is gonna keep on going...
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 02:47 PM
  #30  
killercd4G63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, Ga
Thanks To Everyone with their imput and Advice but I'm going to have to throw my rope on the BBK Full.




Originally Posted by batty200
Ball bearing turbos are more reliable. No if and or but about it.
I can't completely agree with that, I would have to say it all depends on the manufacture.

Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
With larger wheels (FP Black, EF4, etc.) I would tend to agree with the above statement, but in this scenario comparing the smaller stock frame variations, ball bearing vs journal bearing is irrelevant from my experience. Remember, stock turbos are journal bearing and have been known to last quite some time

OP: I would love the opportunity to earn your business, if you're not concerned with ball bearing I believe our EF2 turbocharger to be the perfect option for you. Stock like spool with the capability of putting down 400+whp on 93 octane. 30 day satisfaction guarantee, one year warranty, and we're significantly cheaper
I called you a week Ago Chris, I'm not sure if you remember or not but i explained what i wanted compared to what i have... Thanks for speaking with me and I would still like to get a lot of my replacements from you. I appreciate your time, but for history and reviews I'm going to have to go with the BBK Full Ported. I'm sure the EF series turbos are as powerful as the BBK BUT, From everyone else experience I have to get something i can put my faith in that won't fail me shortly down the road.


Originally Posted by sparky
Let's get a few things straight. There seems to be a misconception regarding ball bearing vs. journal bearing turbos.

First, it is an established and widely accepted fact that ball bearing center sections in general afford improved longevity in comparison to journal bearing center sections in turbochargers. Improved longevity results in improved reliability and reduced repair intervals. Are you arguing against this?

Likewise, turbocharger spool-up, rate of spool, and transient response. All else remaining equal, a ball bearing fitted turbocharger will out spool, have a quicker rate of spool, and improved transient response characteristics in comparison to the same turbocharger fitted with journal bearings. Are you not in agreement with this statement?

The CBRD BBK turbo in journal bearing form has proven to be an exceptionally durable and dependable turbocharger. Most CBRD customers purchase the BBK in its original JB format. However, if you should happen to want it even quicker spooling and longer lasting, then CBRD will fit the BBK with a ball bearing center section.
Originally Posted by Wicked_White10
I have heard nothing but good things about the EF2. Great power, and not too hard on the wallet either. I back up Chris. MAP has a great product.
I've just seen differently on a few others Turbos i.e. - Supras and a Few Tsi's

Originally Posted by 4RETECH
I would just like to say as per longevity........

evo unknown is running my ported BBK-full JB I sold him. When it was sold to him it had ~57,000 miles on it from me. We sent it to CBRD to get a once over before installing it into his car, nothing was wrong with it.

That turbo is still doing fine
I'd have to get one just because of your use of it hahaha, With that many miles and long driving.... Seems like you went to the Ball Bearing series, How is that compared to your JB BBK ?

Originally Posted by evo unknown
...Now it has about 65k miles on the CBRD JB BBK-Full. Zero shaft play and has ran 30psi its whole life.

Incredible spool, 400+awhp easily on 93, and this thing is gonna keep on going...
Nice, I hope to get around that area... 30psi all the time?? Awesome
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:04 PM.