Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

What is the most whp made on a 2.4L with 100mm crank?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 06:01 PM
  #46  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Wiseco/K1.

JE and Wiseco are owned by the same parent company but Wiseco/K1 is its own deal like JE/SRP is its own deal. I am not sure what level of who owns who it is but that is how it was explained to me. I could be incorrect though.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #47  
AreSTG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
From: PA/NC
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Our recommened limit for the standard rod is 8k and 8500 at the track, I normally allow 500 more for the LR2.4 and have personally spun my LR2.4 to 9100 when I had the 3794 on it. I dont recommend making that a habit unless you are willing to pay the piper.
everyone else got to bug you with a question in this thread, why not me?

500 more in a LR, making 9,000rpms (at track)? and 9100 on yours; Is that on a heavy rod like turbo tuff I-beams?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 06:58 PM
  #48  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by AreSTG
everyone else got to bug you with a question in this thread, why not me?

500 more in a LR, making 9,000rpms (at track)? and 9100 on yours; Is that on a heavy rod like turbo tuff I-beams?
Those are 690g apiece. We use the R&R I beam which weighs in at a paltry 602-608g. I actually used a now discontinued 156mm H beam that only weighed 580 when I did the 9100. There will be a 156mm K1 H beam released before too long that weighs only 524g. Havent seen it or tested it yet but DANG thats light.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 08:48 PM
  #49  
2006GSR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 5
From: SD USA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Those are 690g apiece. We use the R&R I beam which weighs in at a paltry 602-608g. I actually used a now discontinued 156mm H beam that only weighed 580 when I did the 9100. There will be a 156mm K1 H beam released before too long that weighs only 524g. Havent seen it or tested it yet but DANG thats light.
What about Alu rods? Yay or nay?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 10:08 PM
  #50  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
The good ones wont fit, the Grodens can be left at home. 100mm is steel rod only, 94mm can squeak an aluminum rod but it gets close.

Aaron
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 11:11 PM
  #51  
silentkiller's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 170
Likes: 1
From: Portland , Oregon
Manley Forged Crank can take You to more then 1000hp with no issues... K1 & Manley Billet way to go if yr pocket allow You.....

I be running Manley Forged fir my 2.4LR setup...
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 09:36 AM
  #52  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
My latest motor will be a Manley Forged crank this time. For the money the extra insurance is worth it.

Last edited by SmurfZilla; Nov 6, 2012 at 07:37 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 09:47 AM
  #53  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
I am jealous and envious with everyone's projected bottom end build specs i.e. rods and cranks.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 04:14 AM
  #54  
2006GSR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 5
From: SD USA
My buddie just made 847 and 729tq on a 6266 on his 2.4L.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 05:24 AM
  #55  
masonh's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: nashville
My buddie just made 847 and 729tq on a 6266 on his 2.4L.

got to be some kind of record for a 6262?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 06:08 AM
  #56  
2006GSR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 5
From: SD USA
Originally Posted by masonh
got to be some kind of record for a 6262?
I know the tq is the highest but the record whp is like 10 or 15 more hp then what he made. Owner was afraid to push it more even tough the tuner was ready to make more power. Tuner is Joey keyman at excessive Autosports in Sioux Falls SD.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 08:46 AM
  #57  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Looks like they have a dynojet? That is definitely impressive numbers, it would be interesting to see that dyno graph.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 09:42 AM
  #58  
Yamahar1's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 275
Likes: 3
From: wichita ks
Originally Posted by 2006GSR
My buddie just made 847 and 729tq on a 6266 on his 2.4L.
what is he running for exhaust?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #59  
2006GSR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 5
From: SD USA
Originally Posted by Yamahar1
what is he running for exhaust?
3" dp with a full 3" exhaust and a cut out about 3 feet after the turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #60  
2006GSR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 5
From: SD USA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Looks like they have a dynojet? That is definitely impressive numbers, it would be interesting to see that dyno graph.
Look up "excessive Autosports" on Facebook. They have the graph. I got a graph but of the 800hp pull.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 PM.