AMS Turbo kit pics
Originally posted by Dragon41673
Fuel management...last I heard they were using AEM EMS...but switching to UTEC...someone please correct me if I am wrong. I do believe you can use a good electronic boost controller with an APEXi S-AFC. But like I always say...I could be wrong
Fuel management...last I heard they were using AEM EMS...but switching to UTEC...someone please correct me if I am wrong. I do believe you can use a good electronic boost controller with an APEXi S-AFC. But like I always say...I could be wrong
Martin is helping us with some UTEC development.
I don't think the UTEC will stay on the car, but hey I could be wrong.
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
I just fired her up! The 4" aluminum intake piping looks sick!! The intake is pretty trick as it allows different mounting of the air filter, stock position, cold air (below the frame rail) and is adjustable to go around stock and aftermarket upper intercooler pipes. Pics coming soon...
We are doing some UTEC testing for the great people at TurboXS and I think it will be a great product. I've used it on WRX's and it's worked very well in the past. I'm sure it will work well on the EVO but we'll probably stick with the EMS because it allows us to run speed density and gets rid of the MAF. Nathan, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the UTEC will allow for speed density in the future.
BTW the header does not contact any part of the radiator or radiator hose, it runs about 1-1.5" away from the hose at it's closest point and we're doing a fire-sleeve to keep the heat away from the hose. Being .125" thick wall, the header has more thermal mass and won't heat up as quickly and and build up as much surface heat as a thin wall header. That will help keep heat away from the engine bay.
Regards,
Martin
We are doing some UTEC testing for the great people at TurboXS and I think it will be a great product. I've used it on WRX's and it's worked very well in the past. I'm sure it will work well on the EVO but we'll probably stick with the EMS because it allows us to run speed density and gets rid of the MAF. Nathan, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the UTEC will allow for speed density in the future.
BTW the header does not contact any part of the radiator or radiator hose, it runs about 1-1.5" away from the hose at it's closest point and we're doing a fire-sleeve to keep the heat away from the hose. Being .125" thick wall, the header has more thermal mass and won't heat up as quickly and and build up as much surface heat as a thin wall header. That will help keep heat away from the engine bay.
Regards,
Martin
Originally posted by AMS
but I believe the UTEC will allow for speed density in the future.
but I believe the UTEC will allow for speed density in the future.
Originally posted by AMS
Nathan, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the UTEC will allow for speed density in the future.
Nathan, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the UTEC will allow for speed density in the future.
-Nathan
www.turboxs.com
Originally posted by advan8
price range and date available, also will SAFC2 work with it or is a stand alone required
price range and date available, also will SAFC2 work with it or is a stand alone required
..with AEM EMS they reached 551whp.. and the torque jumped quite a bit compared to the SAFC..
stock internals (+ HKS 272/272)..

btw, i witnessed the new manifold today in person... me =
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Thanks for all the positive feedback!
We will be using variations of the Garrett GT32 and GT35R turbo's that we have tested and developed on our dyno for our kit. We'll have two trims available with 750hp and 575hp potential.
Martin
We will be using variations of the Garrett GT32 and GT35R turbo's that we have tested and developed on our dyno for our kit. We'll have two trims available with 750hp and 575hp potential.
Martin
Originally posted by AMS
Thanks for all the positive feedback!
We will be using variations of the Garrett GT32 and GT35R turbo's that we have tested and developed on our dyno for our kit. We'll have two trims available with 750hp and 575hp potential.
Martin
Thanks for all the positive feedback!
We will be using variations of the Garrett GT32 and GT35R turbo's that we have tested and developed on our dyno for our kit. We'll have two trims available with 750hp and 575hp potential.
Martin
These are race gas numbers I am assuming?
*edit* Usual gt32/35r spool? 5k ?
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
That is the realistic amount of horsepower you can get with those turbochargers. How you get there, is up to you...alcohol, pump gas, race gas, corn oil, diesel...ect. There is nothing usual about 5K spool up on a GT32. We could have released this kit a long time ago but we spent a lot of time playing with different configurations of wheels and housing to get good spool and tons of horsepower. You can see a small sample of the development work in the latest issue of Modified Magazine, I wrote a turbo testing article and used some EVO graphs as examples. The GT32 spools only a few hundred RPM slower than the stock turbo and the GT35 we use spools about 600rpm slower.
Regards,
Martin
Regards,
Martin
Damn.....!!! AHHHH, I think it's time for me to stop eating out, clubbing, crapping, and I guess I have to stop drinking and eating all together. hhahaha. To save up for this turbo kit!!! Well worth the pain!!!!!! Oh yea, stop driving my evo and start walking to places to save gas money...heheheh. JK. This setup looks sick man. I love the product overall quality and hp potential. All I want is 400-450whp with 4K investment.



