I'm not liking the FP silicone intake
I am well aware of that, I am just saying rubber or silicone in the properties of air flow and drag inside vs metal, there is more restriction throughout silicone being it is softer then the metal where it is smooth and less forgiving.
This is pretty minimal. It's smooth enough. There is a boundary layer regardless, it's just insignificantly thicker if anything. The diameter is significantly larger than the turbo inlet. The internal smoothness vs aluminum doesn't matter IMO. Unless you have some data... The geometry would have a much larger effect than surface smoothness.
I would argue a golf ball textured inside would provide better airflow, especially if you are moving 650cfm of air. Depending on intake diameter you might be able to get a few extra ponies out of it too
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
If I didn't live in CA, I just would have stuck any pipe on there. The FP intake MAY pass visual. Once the airbox is on, it looks somewhat OEM. I'm going to try it, anyway. If it doesn't, I'll be getting very creative with the OEM intake LOL.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
This explains why my diverter valve vent inlet looked jaggedly cut compared to the turbo and intake sides of the FP intake pipe when I bought it used off another member on here.
-pal215
-pal215
^ without turning this into another leaky BB thread, you can thank all the FP fan boys that refuse to acknowledge any flaws with these turbos (or FP customer service) for your new paper weight. Reeks of blind patriotism










