Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Cold air intake a bad idea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 10:48 AM
  #1  
durability's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: NC
Cold air intake a bad idea?

Hi guys. I am a Subaru guy (02 WRX) who is possibly moving over to the Evo crowd (03 Evo). It is my belief that the stock intake set-up on the WRX's is great so I kept mine stock (except for a K + N drop-in filter). I was wondering what the general opinion of cold air intakes on the Evos is. From looking at the engine bay the intake set-up is very similar to the WRX intake set-up (except on the opposite side). So if I do get an Evo would it be best to just invest in a K + N drop-in for the stock intake or are you guys getting good results from aftermarket intakes?

P.S. I did a search and didn't really find anything so please don't respond with the usual "Do a search noob" reply.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 10:56 AM
  #2  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
You are going to get mixed results on this and still not get a real answer. Some will argue that once the air goes thru the turbo inlet temp doesn't matter. Others will argue that if inlet temp is cooler it will still be cooler when it leaves the turbo. I hope you find some definate answers because i was wondering this as well.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:00 AM
  #3  
kdogg's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: NW PA
In order to achieve performance benefits, I've read you need some A/F adjustment if you go with an aftermarket intake. So unless you are getting piggyback, AF controller, or ECU flash, I would just stick with a drop-in filter.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #4  
MrBonus's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
From: DE
Turbos don't like long tracts of pre-turbo intake. It tends to create too much vaccuum and can rob horsepower.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #5  
whitet777's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Kohler, WI
Just because an intact track is longer doesn't necessarily mean it has more restriction than a shorter one with lots of bends (i.e. stock intake). Ultimately, an intake should be like an intercooler: the least pressure drop, the least turbulent flow, and the coolest charge temperature. Balancing all three is the goal of a good intake. I don't think any aftermarket intake system for the Evo is doing all 3 well right now. They are either good flow and hot air or vica versa.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:08 AM
  #6  
MrBonus's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
From: DE
Originally posted by whitet777
Just because an intact track is longer doesn't necessarily mean it has more restriction than a shorter one with lots of bends (i.e. stock intake). Ultimately, an intake should be like an intercooler: the least pressure drop, the least turbulent flow, and the coolest charge temperature. Balancing all three is the goal of a good intake. I don't think any aftermarket intake system for the Evo is doing all 3 well right now. They are either good flow and hot air or vica versa.
If you were to design a CAI for the Evo, it would probably have a few bends and be too long to be effective.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #7  
bolsen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, WI
Maybe if you are pulling air from the back of the car

Colder air is ALWAYS better for a turbo motor. It's why we run intercoolers on the car.

As for is the stock air box, I can't answer that.

I know on the VWs they are a horse a peice. Many guys gut the box, and run a cold air line (just a duct) and route air up to the filter. I chose to put the cold air intake on so it's pulling air from in front of the wheel well. I made noticable breathing changes up top. But is one better over another? Dynos say just a few HP.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #8  
whitet777's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Kohler, WI
Originally posted by MrBonus


If you were to design a CAI for the Evo, it would probably have a few bends and be too long to be effective.
That's not entirely true. I believe APS makes one with 1 large fluid bend that gets cold air from where the intercooler reservoir sits. It's expensive and requires replacing the intercooler with their expensive tank. I am trying to come up with my own idea right now.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:14 AM
  #9  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
The biggest problem with a intake for the EVO as well as for the WRX/STI is the MAF not reading like it would with the stock unit. Some intakes make the car go lean and rich compared to the stock. So if you want to run a intake a A/F computer is need to compusate for the diffrent MAF readings.

The stock EVO intake is Fine for the stock turbo. Vishnu make over 400whp on their dyno with the stock box in place (over 500whp on a dyno jet).

If you are considering a EVO the first thing to do is put a nice exhaust and doing a reflash or piggy back on some sort. You will make more power with piggy backs that can adjust timing.

Eric
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:29 AM
  #10  
evo55's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
I installed my HKS RS kit.....

and it felt different from stock instake box. First off, the car itself has a turbo lag. Turbo doesn't kick in till above 3000 RPM. After installing the kit, the turbo spool is earlier. Slightly less than 3000 RPM. But I notice that the torque in the midrange of the car has lessen since I installed the HKS kit. I don't think it's a big torque decrease but the car pulls harder all the way to the redline. There's a trade off. The early spool doesn't elliminate the turbo lag. With the stock air box, you can tell that the RPM doesn't go faster all the way to the redline. I don't feel any decrease and increase in horse power. If there is an increase, there's no way you can feel it.
As far as hot air being suck on the turbo, I don't think it matters. The compressor wheel compresses the air from the air filter and gets routed to the blow off valve to the intercooler pipe. The intercooler pipe has a bigger diameter than the hose that routes air from the blow off valve. More air is coming from the intercooler than the air filter element.
So is it advisable to put it? I say yes because the sound of the blow off valve is worth the audition.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #11  
evo55's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Originally posted by MrBonus
Turbos don't like long tracts of pre-turbo intake. It tends to create too much vaccuum and can rob horsepower.
I think this is true. Turbo is power in the top end. You want the RPM to be all the way up. If you want power in the low end, use a supercharger.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:38 AM
  #12  
XRS-Lift's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
The way I see it, the purpose of a CAI is to get COLD AIR is it not? What the hell kind of air does the stock box get? Look where the intake is! Its INFRONT of the motor. It takes air from the coldest place possible. And it acts like a ram air. I have the K&N drop in filter with a dynoflash to make sure the ecu uses it properly and im loving it. Im not the only one who thinks the stock box with a k&n filter is the best way to go, not to mention cheapest.

The way i see it, an open element filters only advantage is the bov sound is noticable. Other than than, i think they perform worse. I once raced a evo in my evo when he had hks open element filter and jic turboback and i just had nothing at all but a rmr catback. I POUNDED HIM. Im guessing it was the intake he had. Stick with stock and get a k&n drop in if u want performance, get a open element if u want cool sounds.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #13  
DocMortal's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Victorville CA
Im also using the stock air box its design is perfect.. And AL recommends it,he can tune AROUND the open element if needed..

Quote from AL DYNOFLASH

"The bushur intake will NOT make any additional power over K & N pannel

Advantages - cleaner looking engine bay - less wieght - better sound

Disdvatnages - stock is better design and more protection for engine - less noise"


Granted alot of people are using open elements,it does make you hear he turbo better,but unless you are using an aftermarket turbo upgrade its not necessary...It becomes a restriction after 400 WHP from what I have heard,granted im not an expert but just my opinion......youll hear alot from this topic

Last edited by DocMortal; Apr 15, 2004 at 11:51 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #14  
evo55's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Originally posted by XRS-Lift
The way I see it, the purpose of a CAI is to get COLD AIR is it not? What the hell kind of air does the stock box get? Look where the intake is! Its INFRONT of the motor. It takes air from the coldest place possible. And it acts like a ram air. I have the K&N drop in filter with a dynoflash to make sure the ecu uses it properly and im loving it. Im not the only one who thinks the stock box with a k&n filter is the best way to go, not to mention cheapest.

The way i see it, an open element filters only advantage is the bov sound is noticable. Other than than, i think they perform worse. I once raced a evo in my evo when he had hks open element filter and jic turboback and i just had nothing at all but a rmr catback. I POUNDED HIM. Im guessing it was the intake he had. Stick with stock and get a k&n drop in if u want performance, get a open element if u want cool sounds.

You pound on him because you have more mods than him. Not because of the air filter. You have flashed your ECU meaning your tapered PSI is gone. You are pushing 19 psi all the way to the redline. While the guy's turbo pressure was probably around 16 psi when you passed him. It can't be the air filter.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 11:52 AM
  #15  
Dr Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 195
Likes: 1
From: Trinidad, West Indies
I've been modding cars for years and I can honestly say that the EVO 8 has one of the best intake designs by far. If you like throwing away your money go get an aftermarket CAI. My recommendation is to get a K&N drop-in filter and use the intake money to get a ECU reflash.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01 AM.