Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New Dyno sheet w/GT35R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2004 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
EVOlunchbox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 1
From: Pa
New Dyno sheet w/GT35R, w/pics...

Well I just got my car back after a long awaited couple of months with a custom GT35R kit installed. Evan Cline former fabricator from Godspeed fabricated the majority of the kit, except for the manifold but he did have to modify it several times to get things to fit right. At the same time he installed a ATS triple plate carbon clutch, Apexi Power FC (D-Jetro), Greddy 740cc injectors, fuel pimp, small battery kit, custom IC piping, Tail wastegate/BV, and other little things. The manifold is from DN performance but the wastegate flange needed to be adjusted a little to fit the new Tail. Also my idle is a little screwed up on the Power FC but will be fixed soon. I also have stock cams, stock bottom end, and a stock head but made 383.3hp and 307ft/lb. This is without cams because I wanted to see what we can make with stock internals in place. This is also on 93oct, no knock, and very safe AF's. I'll post pics of the setup as soon as I get my hands on a digital camera. But here's the dyno sheet.

Edit: Sorry for the ****ty scan, it's my first time.
Attached Thumbnails New Dyno sheet w/GT35R-dyno.gif  

Last edited by EVOlunchbox; Aug 20, 2004 at 11:12 AM.
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #2  
metaphysical's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
From: Penn State University
Seems very low. Your torque is WAY to low. 93 octane or not, that's not a good tune. Dynapacks dyno high.
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #3  
nastea's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
thats it? i've seen 320ish on a dynapack for an evo with stock turbo, and more torque. A nicely tuned camed evo is putting out 370ish WHP on a dynojet, which would be about 350ish on the dynopack?

are you tuned properly? with that turbo kit i would want to see more then that....
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 01:55 PM
  #4  
moses evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: scotland home of the brave
Originally Posted by EVOlunchbox
Well I just got my car back after a long awaited couple of months with a custom GT35R kit installed. Dan (Guru) and his crew from Godspeed fabricated the majority of the kit, except for the manifold but he did have to modify it several times to get things to fit right. At the same time he installed a ATS triple plate carbon clutch, Apexi Power FC (D-Jetro), Greddy 740cc injectors, fuel pimp, small battery kit, custom IC piping, Tail wastegate/BV, and other little things. The manifold is from DN performance but the wastegate flange needed to be adjusted a little to fit the new Tail. Also my idle is a little screwed up on the Power FC but will be fixed soon. I also have stock cams, stock bottom end, and a stock head but made 383.3hp and 307ft/lb. This is without cams because I wanted to see what we can make with stock internals in place. This is also on 93oct, no knock, and very safe AF's. I'll post pics of the setup as soon as I get my hands on a digital camera. But here's the dyno sheet.

Edit: Sorry for the ****ty scan, it's my first time.

mate at what bar, very low torque figure should have been near 350 to 360
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #5  
maki's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: chicagoland
Originally Posted by metaphysical
Seems very low. Your torque is WAY to low. 93 octane or not, that's not a good tune. Dynapacks dyno high.
yeah pretty low number for that turbo
my friend dynoed 350 on stock turbo, only with cams and 660cc injectors
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #6  
Mitchubishievo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (310)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: Chicago NW Suburbs
Those sheets are pretty embarassing man, less than 400 WHP and just 310 lb. tq. with a turbo upgrade? Just gets some cams and get tuned better; on a GT35R you should be at about 450 WHP minimum .
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
evo542's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
i agree, ditch the stock cams than retune it
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 04:54 PM
  #8  
EvolvedfromaWRX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Import Image Racing
how much boost is my questions
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 06:40 PM
  #9  
Chris in HB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: No VA
All haters... Not one encouraging word.

The torque is low, but as you stated, it's a very preliminary state of tune with stock internals. I am really curious to see how you end up - congrats on your turbo swap. Check with some of the other swapped guys about how to get those torque numbers up. Keep us posted.
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #10  
justrick's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio Texas
nice preliminary numbers. ill bet when you lean that out to about 12.7 to 1 and add some timing that torque figure is going to go through the roof. cant wait too see the new numbers.. congrats on that sweet a** turbo setup..
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #11  
MrBonus's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
From: DE
Did you tune the car completely with the Power FC Commander or did you use the software?
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #12  
en1gma19's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by metaphysical
Seems very low. Your torque is WAY to low. 93 octane or not, that's not a good tune. Dynapacks dyno high.

ummm, i think its dynojets dynos high. dynapack is fairly close. dyno dynamics ande mustang dyno are almost exact.
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 07:36 PM
  #13  
EVOlunchbox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 1
From: Pa
Originally Posted by moses evo
mate at what bar, very low torque figure should have been near 350 to 360
I'm running around 1.5 bar~21psi

Originally Posted by Chris in HB
All haters... Not one encouraging word.

The torque is low, but as you stated, it's a very preliminary state of tune with stock internals. I am really curious to see how you end up - congrats on your turbo swap. Check with some of the other swapped guys about how to get those torque numbers up. Keep us posted.
Thanks man, I'll let you know what happens after I get cams/head.

Originally Posted by MrBonus
Did you tune the car completely with the Power FC Commander or did you use the software?.
Unfortunately the car was tuned completly from the commander... Thats why my idle sucks so bad.
Either I need to get datalogic, or have someone from one of the few Power Excel dealerships come and tune it here. I am way too far away to drive to Texas or Cali.
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #14  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Big turbo at low boost. Not surprising the low torque. Prolly also has the 82 exhaust housing too. I put stock cams back in my car once just to see how it would perfom. It was like puttin a rag over the intake of the turbo.
Reply
Old May 11, 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #15  
EVOlunchbox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 1
From: Pa
So you think the low torque numbers now are due to not having cams?

Also I'm not exactly sure what the sizes on the turbo are. I'm pretty sure your right. All that I know about it is that it's directly from Garett

Last edited by EVOlunchbox; May 11, 2004 at 07:45 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 PM.