Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

HKS cams question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 02:28 PM
  #16  
BadazzCR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 921
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by Dragon41673
SEVEN - I'm running the 264i/272e setup with stock springs and valves...works like a charm.

Evoego - why run a larger intake cam with a smaller exhaust cam? Your going to flow more in then you can let out...kind of retarded don't ya think? Granted it's been done, but it's not the best combo in the world...if you want 272i...then just do the 272e as well...your idle will be the same no matter what because you are using the 272i cam reguardless
Funny thing is that for many years now all major domestic camshaft manufactures have always had their forced induction camshafts with a longer duration intake. Oh and don't forget our buddies across the ocean who also run the longer duration intake camshaft and love. Also not to forget that the exhaust flows very fast and at a much higer temp than intake. By allowing the intake cam to stay open longer you are increasing the amount of air in (duh) and by running the smaller exhaust cam the exhaust gas speeds are really quick
which spools the turbo very fast. We have used this combo on a few evos now, and with stock turbo have seen no difference in topend over the straight 272 combo. It
has been my opion and still is that the 272in 264ex makes the best power on stock turbo. But for larger turbo applications run the straight 272's. If you were ever to drive a car with the two diffent combos you would be amazed by the low and mid range power of the 272in 264ex combo, while still hanging with the the 272in 272ex cars on topend. But then there are always people who just want to see dyno graphs of the two combos with we are working on.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #17  
evoego's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Dirty South
thanks Doug, I was just about to tell them to contact you about this, plus you just saved me from having to explain it. Dragon you did not offend me in anyway, you just didnt give me the chance to explain before calling it retarded. no hard feeling here, hell give it a try sometime, or Ill give you a ride in my car is this what Im going with since I plan on having the stock turbo for a long time. Doug so you got me some cams yet so we can get this going?? lol
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #18  
evo8_m3's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: CT
Instead of changing the valve springs, I would just use that money to upgrade the Head studs. you'll need this more than changing the valve springs. But if you have the extra cash to do change the studs & valve springs, then go for it
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #19  
Raman's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: NY
Does the 272/264 combo causes rough idle like the 272/272?
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #20  
evoego's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Dirty South
Yes!! It is actually a little more aggressive, like a V8 with a massive cam lope. I tend to like it however. It is easily corrected with a standalone like an AEM,etc, and nicely aggressive with a piggyback like an emanage. Just remember if you want power you are normally going to have to sacrifice something.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #21  
titaniumkingpin's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 835
Likes: 1
im considering getting the HKS 264/264 cams. it seems like everyone mixes and matches these cams. if i go with a straight 264 combo, will i see decent gains? how about idle....smooth?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 01:31 PM
  #22  
Guack007's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: CA
Boost solutions liked it so much they never posted the dyno charts as promised...
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 08:48 PM
  #23  
sleet's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,197
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by Guack007
Boost solutions liked it so much they never posted the dyno charts as promised...
Lol.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 08:37 AM
  #24  
evoego's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Dirty South
Originally Posted by Guack007
Boost solutions liked it so much they never posted the dyno charts as promised...
**** dyno charts....I have been in several cars with it and it hits very hard, the wheels bark with the first 3 gears. Its like launching 3 times in a row. Do what you want however!They all work!!!
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 05:16 AM
  #25  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
Funny thing is that for many years now all major domestic camshaft manufactures have always had their forced induction camshafts with a longer duration intake. Oh and don't forget our buddies across the ocean who also run the longer duration intake camshaft and love. Also not to forget that the exhaust flows very fast and at a much higer temp than intake. By allowing the intake cam to stay open longer you are increasing the amount of air in (duh) and by running the smaller exhaust cam the exhaust gas speeds are really quick
which spools the turbo very fast. We have used this combo on a few evos now, and with stock turbo have seen no difference in topend over the straight 272 combo. It
has been my opion and still is that the 272in 264ex makes the best power on stock turbo. But for larger turbo applications run the straight 272's. If you were ever to drive a car with the two diffent combos you would be amazed by the low and mid range power of the 272in 264ex combo, while still hanging with the the 272in 272ex cars on topend. But then there are always people who just want to see dyno graphs of the two combos with we are working on.
I know i am digging this post up from the dead , but couldn't you use cam gears with straight 272's and retard the exhaust cam more than the intake side to duplicate the 272 264 setup.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 07:36 AM
  #26  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by VTECH8TR
I know i am digging this post up from the dead , but couldn't you use cam gears with straight 272's and retard the exhaust cam more than the intake side to duplicate the 272 264 setup.
You can't change the duration of a cam with gears. Only when it begins to open. Not the same.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 07:54 AM
  #27  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
You can't change the duration of a cam with gears. Only when it begins to open. Not the same.
Dohh,, You're right.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boostedrb
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
18
Aug 2, 2012 02:22 PM
rdtech
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
18
Mar 4, 2010 03:14 PM
hustlerhop
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Mar 6, 2008 09:30 AM
yellowEVO21
Evo General
10
Aug 9, 2005 11:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:15 AM.