Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: In terms of looks which car would you get?
The Evo
49
76.56%
The New Colt
15
23.44%
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll

EVO or Colt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 12:26 AM
  #46  
fishsauce's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
isnt the new colt just the new tarmac spyder that mitsubishi displayed at the detroit auto show, except the ones u see here have roofs.

p.s. Billy: i like accords
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 04:51 AM
  #47  
Turboniam's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally posted by Evoandy
Who cares if its a hatch or not? if the colt is faster, its mine.
You read my mind!!!
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:15 PM
  #48  
BurnOutz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Herktown, Cali
Originally posted by evo_dan
WRC has always mostly been on gravel. The Evo was designed to be a rally car.
"Like mentioned earlier the new evolution V was designed, mainly, as a tarmac spec car. Mitsubishi and RalliArt have, however, redesigned many mechanical parts in order to allow changing them very rapidly." Go to www.lancer-evolution.net

Dunno if this source is completely reliable though.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 09:45 PM
  #49  
silvrvr6's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Billy
Oops, here's the pic...
that colt reminds me of my brother 1981-or83 dodge colt turbo, the rims and all. That thing was fast, it can with a sticker on the back hatch that said"dont step on the gas unless u really mean it"

Does anyone know more about the 81-83 turbo colts, like hp, 0-60 times,,, i think it was really fast to 50. The car had a stick buy the 5 speed that you could shift from eco, to a starbust, which was for fast driving.

thanks
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2003 | 05:32 AM
  #50  
Dubai_EvoVII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: United Arab Emirates
Hmm not too sure about the the New Colt it kind of looks funny. To me ..
And I would want that extra room for stuff .. the colt is too small. But I am sure it might me faster then the EVO due to the weight differents. But How it handles no body knows
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 05:49 PM
  #51  
xjapx's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Boring, OR
i think the tarmac spyder/new colt looks goofy. the headlights go way too far up the hood. it looks like a shorter matrix to me. i'd go with the evo.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 07:14 PM
  #52  
silver03accord's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Go Evo!
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 09:06 PM
  #53  
Braf's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Third rock.
I love the Evo line but it is just too big a platform to be competitive for WRC. Like the Galant before it, it too has got left behind. I spoke to a Mitsubishi factory rep soon after the Japanese launch of the Colt and he admitted that the Lancers rallying days were numbered.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 08:56 AM
  #54  
Maniac's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: North Georgia Mountains
Evo colt

Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 08:59 AM
  #55  
Maniac's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: North Georgia Mountains
General specifications
Country of origin Japan
Produced in 2002
Introduced at 2002 Essen Motorshow
Numbers built N/A
Body design N/A
Weight 1260 kg / 2777.8 lbs

Drivetrain
Engine 4G63 Straight 4
Engine location Front, transversely mounted
Displacement 1.997 liter / 121.9 cu in
Valvetrain 4 valves/cylinder, DOHC
Fuel feed Fuel injection
Aspiration Turbo
Gearbox 5 Speed Manual
Drive All wheel drive

Performance figures
Power 280 bhp / 208.9 kW @ 6900 rpm
BHP/Liter 140.2
Torque 380 Nm / 280.3 ft lbs @ 3000 rpm
Power to weight ratio 0.22 bhp/kg
Top Speed 155.3 mph / 250.0 km/h
0-60 mph Acceleration 4.40 s
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 09:02 AM
  #56  
Shahul X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, Maryland
no...evo it is...

-shahul
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 09:13 PM
  #57  
silvrevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Big Red Country
Looks like the dodge colt turbo my brother had in 1982-5! That thing was very fast for its time. Bring it over, always like the hatch back.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 08:26 AM
  #58  
USP45's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 2
From: Frisco
If I pulled up in that thing my friends and family would laugh there a$$es off. Unfortunatly my father would then get in his supercharged C2 Porsche and still proceed to beat the hell out of it. I will take the Evo as I at least do not get laughed at!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 07:29 PM
  #59  
n00b's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
*drools* that evo colt that maniac posted it freakin insane. I wouldnt mind cruising in that at all.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 07:43 PM
  #60  
Bexa20's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 560
Likes: 1
The Black Colt doesn't look too bad comparing to the new one. But I'll stick with the EVO.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:11 PM.