Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

US EVO driving review...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 02:40 PM
  #61  
MrAWD's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 22
From: Reading, MA
Originally posted by evo_dan
So what? The USDM STi with 300 hp will not be faster then the JDM STi with 315 hp. They are going to be very close to each other and this gives us a very good idea as what to expect. Still a good link.
Well, we still don't know the torque and HP curves for the USDM STi, so what you wrote up there might not be entirely accurate! If there is a lot more "stuff" under the USDM STi curves, it might be faster, compared to something that is a bit on the peaky side!

We will know soon!!


Fedja
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 03:33 PM
  #62  
EVOwhat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: boonies
Originally posted by evo_dan


So what? The USDM STi with 300 hp will not be faster then the JDM STi with 315 hp. They are going to be very close to each other and this gives us a very good idea as what to expect. Still a good link.
whose to say it won't be faster?...there is a big difference between the JDM 2.0 and the USDM 2.5...
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #63  
MrAWD's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 22
From: Reading, MA
Originally posted by EVOwhat
whose to say it won't be faster?...there is a big difference between the JDM 2.0 and the USDM 2.5...
I though, I just did!

Fedja
ps. well, I didn't really say it won't, but I didn't say it will be either!!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 03:56 PM
  #64  
evo_dan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
I still say, "So What"? It's still a good link.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 04:03 PM
  #65  
EVOwhat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: boonies
Originally posted by MrAWD

...
ps. well, I didn't really say it won't, but I didn't say it will be either!!
neither did i!


Originally posted by evo_dan

...
I still say, "So What"? It's still a good link.
it is a good link...here's another one with a little more accurate detail...sans 0-60,1/4mi,etc.


http://www.subaru.net/usproduct/2004/Stiinitspec.asp
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 04:15 PM
  #66  
KK's Avatar
KK
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally posted by EVOwhat
it is a good link...here's another one with a little more accurate detail...sans 0-60,1/4mi,etc.


http://www.subaru.net/usproduct/2004/Stiinitspec.asp
Is that accurate? It says the Sti has 3 turns, lock to lock and 15:1 ratio. The Evo is listed at only 2.1 and 13:1

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 04:38 PM
  #67  
evo_dan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Originally posted by KK

The Evo is listed at only 2.1 and 13:1

Mark
Thank you Mark. Finaly found the answer to a 2 month old question I've been having. What does 13:1 translate to lock to lock?

STi 3.0 lock to lock? I can see it now, driver of the STi trying to negotiate a corner at the local mall with hands frantically flailing as if crossed up in a turn at 100mph at a race track. That should make for the rearview mirror to fly off a few times.

Ya, is 3.0 accurate?

Last edited by evo_dan; Jan 10, 2003 at 04:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 04:45 PM
  #68  
Score's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: roseville, ca
3.0? Doubt it. Last STi I heard of was 2.6.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 10:32 PM
  #69  
EVOwhat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: boonies
those are just initial specs...but from a credible source...until SOA releases official specs...i would take everything with a grain of salt...just feeding the fire...
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #70  
neilboone11's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
What does the 15:1 ratio and the 3.0 turns lock to lock mean?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 10:45 AM
  #71  
Fireball's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,464
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Originally posted by neilboone11
What does the 15:1 ratio and the 3.0 turns lock to lock mean?
When the wheel is turned so you can't turn it anymore all one way, to the exact same, the full other way, only 3 complete turns of the steering wheel.

Most cars, it's 4+... the Evo it's only 2.1.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 06:53 PM
  #72  
shirokuma's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo
The standard JDM STi is 15:1, and there is an optional 13.0:1 ratio available for it, which is standard for the Spec C. The 15:1 ratio is still rather quick without feeling overly nervous on the road, more ideal for a day-to-day car. 13:1 is quick and does feel rather nervous, but is great at the track.

Cheers,

Paul Hansen
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #73  
neilboone11's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
So is it usually better to have more or less complete turns of the wheel?
No one really answered what the 15:1 ratio stands for and what it means... im just curious cuz it seems like a big topic of discussion here.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 12:31 PM
  #74  
EVOwhat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: boonies
what this means is that for one complete revolution of the steering wheel...the wheels/tires move 24°...

360°/ x = 15 ... x = 24

what you really need to be concerned about is that the greater the steering ratio, the more revolutions of the steering wheel you have to turn to get the car to turn...
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:41 PM.