Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Motor Trend Evo,RS,MR test data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #16  
Kyle R's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
I find it really interesting that the Evo VIII beats the RS in braking, slalom, AND roadcourse.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #17  
EVO Neil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by ROGERV
was the evo VIII with moonroof ?
No
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #18  
marksae's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 1
From: SF, CA
Looks like the stiffer KYB shocks are better for the slalom compared to the softer Bilsteins.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #19  
Kordwood's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Vestal, NY
Don't forget that the wing not only looks stupid, but it creates significant drag. Take the wing off the MR and it would make a big difference.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #20  
marksae's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 1
From: SF, CA
Wow, the wing and weight difference between the RS and GSR makes almost a 3 mph difference in trap speed.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #21  
machron1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 1
From: Portland, Oregon
Easier to read:
Code:
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Evo                 |  VIII     |  MR       |  RS          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|  0-30                |  1.4      |  1.5      |  1.3         |
|  0-40                |  2.3      |  2.6      |  2.2         |
|  0-50                |  3.5      |  3.5      |  3.3         |
|  0-60                |  4.7      |  4.7      |  4.3         |
|  0-70                |  6.5      |  6.4      |  6.0         |
|  0-80                |  8.3      |  8.0      |  7.7         |
|  0-90                |  11.0     |  10.5     |  10.0        |
|  0-100               |  13.5     |  13.1     |  12.6        |
|  1/4 mile            |  13.5@100 |  13.4@102 |  13.1@102.8  |
|  Brake,100-0         |  322      |  316      |  341         |
|  brake,60-0          |  111      |  111      |  112         |
|  600ft slalom        |  70.9mph  |  70.1mph  |  69.3mph     |
|  200ft skid pad      |  .94      |  .95      |  .95         |
|  roadcourse lap sec. |  92.07    |  91.80    |  92.15       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:49 PM
  #22  
machron1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 1
From: Portland, Oregon
Did the RS have something wrong with its brakes? Seems like being the lightest of the bunch, it should have the shortest stopping distance???

EDIT: Nevermind I guess even the '05 RS doesn't have ABS?

Last edited by machron1; Jan 25, 2005 at 01:56 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #23  
gtr's Avatar
gtr
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 1
Neil, did alll 3 cars have launch control at 5K rpms?

Interesting on the salom between the RS and GSR. I wonder why the GSR is faster? I guess depending on surface traction sometime more weight = better grip.

Last edited by gtr; Jan 25, 2005 at 01:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #24  
machron1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 1
From: Portland, Oregon
Dam RS got 0-60 in 4.3 Seconds! That's smokin!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:52 PM
  #25  
jude's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: DFW TX
The RS does not have ABS. The braking test is done at impending lockup, without ABS this is very difficult to control. This will affect road course times and braking tests.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #26  
machron1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 1
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by jude
The RS does not have ABS. The braking test is done at impending lockup, without ABS this is very difficult to control. This will affect road course times and braking tests.
Damn I didn't edit my post fast enough
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #27  
astondg's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Australia
That's interesting. I thought a lot of people say that ABS doesn't stop as quickly as a good driver without it could? Also a lot of race cars don't use ABS, I think F1 had it and then it was banned but that was an expensive system made just for racing not a normal road car ABS? Anyway the results are there, and the cars with ABS stop quicker even though they are heavier.

To Kordwood: Are you serious? It might create drag for the acceleration times but it also creates a lot of downforce for the handling and road course part. Without it those figures would be a lot worse.

EDIT: I just realised that one of the reasons that the RS takes longer to stop and is slower around the road course could be because it is missing the rear wing. Could this be correct? I have read that Mitsubishi put a lot of effort and wind tunnel testing into the wing and the car so taking it away could have a noticable effect.

EDIT EDIT: ray3328 posted the same thing about the wing while I was editing my post. Sorry.

Aston

Last edited by astondg; Jan 25, 2005 at 02:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #28  
EVO Neil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by gtr
Neil, did alll 3 cars have launch control at 5K rpms?

Interesting on the salom between the RS and GSR. I wonder why the GSR is faster? I guess depending on surface traction sometime more weight = better grip.
Yes, all of the '05 have the launch control parameter, limiting them to 5,000 rpm's, which is to low for a good launch.

RS has more oversteer than GSR, less balanced in the slalom.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #29  
ray3328's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
The article said that the MRs lighter wheels helped on the braking and that the RS had understeer during the laps. Goes to show you that the wing does it's job. I wonder how the VIII would do with lighter rims.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 02:21 PM
  #30  
jude's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: DFW TX
Why would the RS have more understeer? I have a hard time believing the wing has anything to do with handling below 60 mph.

Last edited by jude; Jan 25, 2005 at 02:25 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 AM.