Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

To Cam or not to Cam!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #16  
TC4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
I don't think you could do it without cams. Well may be you could but you would be seriously overboosting the car and that is going to hurt the reliability as much as anything (except detonation of course).

Using a bigger turbo without the car breathing any more is like pouring 2x as much fluid down a funnel; yeah it may flow a little more but what it is really doing is just building up pressure. the stock cams can only flow so much and they are perfectly matched (well actually they could stand to be a little bigger IMO) with the stock turbo. Go with a bigger turbo and they aren't going to be able to keep up. If you do the bigger turbo make sure you have the supporting mods and cams are on that list.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 11:55 PM
  #17  
BlkEvo8AMS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
go with the HKS 272's, once u get on the highway with those youll have a grin the whole way home
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 12:44 AM
  #18  
ThEHiTMaN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
From: South FL
LOL! I guess my next mod will be Cams and Head studs.... But what cams is the question? I do feel the top end of this car really is very weak. My 2G eclipse had tons of top end it was a roll on queen from 60mph kind of car. I really miss it and want that top end back. Where I am it is very very hard to "neogiate" a stop light race. Mostly roll's are what I get.... When you get beat by a civic hatch you kinda start to look for mods... :P I knew those drag radials meant something..... So is the 272 worth it? How is it when it comes to stalling? I can deal with it hear and there.... But if that is all it does I will not be very happy this is my daily driver....
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #19  
Doc's Avatar
Doc
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Im asking myself the same question right now......Ive decided to get cams but cant decide between HKS 264/272 or 272/272......

Has anyone ran the 264/272 and 272/272 that can give there impressions......

I know with proper tuning-flash,safc,or cam gears you can get the 272s to idle good but Im concered about loosing good amounts of torque for small amounts of peak horsepower and more lag......

I dont have much experiance when it comes to modifying cars but from what I have read,if the top end of the 264/272's(and if this cam combo is safe) is similar to the 272's then that would be a great setup for stock to midsize turbos...IMO......
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 01:27 AM
  #20  
inariv5573's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, N.J.
Originally Posted by Nesiop
You do the turbo to be safe you will need to do internals anyway. Headstuds and rod bolts are a very recommended thing... And a clutch eventually to hold better. But you will def. want cams. It is internal but not a huge thing. I need to get a set when taxes come in. It is one of the largest gains for small money. People see gains between 20-30 awhp and .1-.2 off the quarter. Plus 272's def. make up on the highway disadvantage of the evo's awd.

Tim
Not necessarily. When Buschur first put on the 20g on his Talon, I don't think he had cams. Stock internals should be fine so long as you don't go crazy on the boost.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 01:29 AM
  #21  
inariv5573's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, N.J.
Originally Posted by BlkEvo8AMS
go with the HKS 272's, once u get on the highway with those youll have a grin the whole way home
Yeah but will the 272's pass inspection? Let alone the 264's. This is the reason why I am staying clear of cams, unless I have a guarantee they will pass inspection, with or without the stock catalytic converter.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 01:31 AM
  #22  
inariv5573's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, N.J.
Not to mention the cams will wear down the stock springs and valves over time from what I hear.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 02:00 AM
  #23  
evo81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 0
cam it up
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:05 AM
  #24  
yesevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
i ll get 264 cams for reliablity issue and idle
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:31 AM
  #25  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
The only time I have had straight 272's stall is on a car with an aftermarket MAF pipe. On the cars I've installed the cams on with the OE MAF pipe (even with an aftermarket filter on the end of it) there has been not one incident of stalling. This is pre-tune. Now the idle is pretty rough before you get it tuned for the cams, but not so much so that the car is stumbling and stalling. After a tune, I really "like" the lopey idle. I've gotten more complements from the V8 crowd on how good the car sounds at idle. I've yet to install them in a car and it "lose low end torque". Of course I've also yet to install them on a car that didn't at least have a full 3" TBE (something else the layman believes "loses low end torque"). After experience, I have to concur with David Buschur. The 272's are the way to go, unless you have to have a lope free idle. His dyno testing (along with dyno graphs) have shown that the 272 cams give up nothing, nowhere in the power band to the OE or 264 cams.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #26  
ThEHiTMaN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
From: South FL
In Buschurs staged packages they used 264..... So your saying most people recommend 272's? I don't mind a lope to the idle... My bike has a very lopey idel and I love it. I just don't want driveability throw out the door. My bike stalls rather easy once it gets warm.. Are cam gears a must with 272's?

Last edited by ThEHiTMaN; Feb 20, 2005 at 03:54 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #27  
tcarretti's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
I've got about 15oo miles on an HKS 272Intake 264Exhaust setup with Fidanza cam gears set at -3, -2. The idle is a little lumpy but I have never stalled and I can feel quite a bit of difference since the cam install. Once the car is warmed up, the idle issue becomes nonexistent for me. Actually my next mod is either going to be the TME 16g Ti turbo (if I can find one in the next week..... since I'm getting tuned in March and would have to have it in by then....) or the mystical 20g that everyone has been talking about. I think having the cams before the turbo is the practical way to do it, but I could be wrong. Just my 2 cents....
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:13 PM
  #28  
ThEHiTMaN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
From: South FL
I am between the HKS 264 and HKS 272.... I am not looking to upgrade the valve train so other brands are kinda out.... I don't really want to do cam gears at this time so would 272's really be ok straight up?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:24 PM
  #29  
spoolingEVOx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, USA
how would the top end of JUN 264's fare compared to HKS 272's?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #30  
dizzigital's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
to cam
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:21 PM.