Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

If mitsu revived the AWD turbo Eclipse (this time with a V6), who would buy it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #1  
mathgeek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
If mitsu revived the AWD turbo Eclipse (this time with a V6), who would buy it?

It's unlikely that they'll bring back the AWD turbocharged 2.0 liter Eclipse (that's what the Evo is for), but if Mitsubishi reintroduced the turbocharged V6 with AWD, would anyone be interested? Why or why not? It just seems that you'll always be able to get more power from a V6 than a 4-cylinder.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:33 AM
  #2  
Rez90's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
From: Flemington, NJ
me....if it had the 4G63. The EVO would be my 4 door and the Eclipse would be my two door
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #3  
Arithmetic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
if the new 4g came w/ awd or even RWD... id consider it.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #4  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
I don't care what Mitsu offers, my Evo is my first, last, and only Mitsu.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #5  
SouthernCrane's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
The new eclipse with AWD and it's V6 would be nice.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #6  
Porsche518's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
I think they did like this at one point in time, i believe it was called the 3000 gt VR-4.

But seriously, the 4g63 potential and power platform is one of the best in the world regardless of it having 4 cylinders. The V6 would be something brand new and would take years to be at where the 4g63 is today. And i can tell you first hand that working with turbocharged V6s is a PITA to work on.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #7  
evolution mr'd's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: griffin, GA
i would definitely give it some thought, a 6 with turbo would be much better
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
mathgeek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
I'm a bit ignorant on these matters, but is front wheel drive good for anything? I've always thought that it's more efficient than RWD because with the engine up front, you always lose energy getting the power to the rear wheels through the driveline (just a matter of simple physics). Is RWD generally better for performance?

Last edited by mathgeek; Feb 27, 2005 at 11:43 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #9  
Ev0 loo shun's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
well...i have a 98 gst eclipse, and if they came out with a new v6 turbo awd....if it was as reliable as my 98 gst....then No.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
DaveVIII's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Plano
I personally just don't like the styling of the new Eclipse, so no I wouldn't buy one.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 01:01 PM
  #11  
EVO_JOE's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Mitsubishi Santa Monica
Originally Posted by mathgeek
I'm a bit ignorant on these matters, but is front wheel drive good for anything? I've always thought that it's more efficient than RWD because with the engine up front, you always lose energy getting the power to the rear wheels through the driveline (just a matter of simple physics). Is RWD generally better for performance?

Just imagine if you were to power the car with your body strength. Its a lot easier to push that to pull. It's also a lot easier to control. True some of the RWD cars lose some of the grip because the weight isn't distributed even. But when it comes to braking and turning you'll have way more control with the RWD. Another factor in play is the didtrbution of the weight when accelerating. The weight of the vehicle is force toward the rear of the car. So during acceleration most RWD cars will dominate in this catigory. This technology in very evident in the nisssan series of car (Infiniti G35 or FX45, Skyline). They mount there engine at a 52-48 ratio so during acceleration and speed over 45MPH the car is at a 50-50 balance. Most cars are a 60-40 split mount or a 63-37 split mount. Thus making many cars (including the Evo) front heavy. Fortunate for us Evo owner's, the miracle of Limited Slip has been developed. The 2005 Evo owner benifit the most with there front limited slip and ACD.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 02:32 PM
  #12  
Thoe99's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
I don't care what Mitsu offers, my Evo is my first, last, and only Mitsu.
Same here. If I were to buy another car, it would be a totally different car, not the same thing (aka lotus elise).
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #13  
RaceBiscuit's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Hm, I'd definitely be interested in test-driving one... but my Evo will always be my baby.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #14  
thatsMR2u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
all that comes to mind when i think of the new eclipse is a 18 year old girls car, cause to them its "cute"
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #15  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Some fantasy Eclipse = Evo General... Anyone get this? And no, my 8 is the only Mitsu I will EVER buy
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 PM.