Why can't the Evolution be rear wheel bias?
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by voidhawk
Choice quote from the paper:
"If an emphasis on cornering performance is required, the front/rear torque-distribution should be established at about 30:70."
"If an emphasis on traction performance and stability is required, the front/rear torque-distribution should be established at 50:50."
"In light of the factors described above, it was determined that the base front/rear ratio should be 50:50 (optimizes running performance and stability) and that directional response should be maximized by control of the center differential differential-limiting action."
The 50/50 split of the Evo is not a limitation, but a conscious design choice by
. It gives you the best possible traction, and the ACD moves the split around that base line to achieve better turning response.
"If an emphasis on cornering performance is required, the front/rear torque-distribution should be established at about 30:70."
"If an emphasis on traction performance and stability is required, the front/rear torque-distribution should be established at 50:50."
"In light of the factors described above, it was determined that the base front/rear ratio should be 50:50 (optimizes running performance and stability) and that directional response should be maximized by control of the center differential differential-limiting action."
The 50/50 split of the Evo is not a limitation, but a conscious design choice by
. It gives you the best possible traction, and the ACD moves the split around that base line to achieve better turning response.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GDB
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
16
Jan 3, 2005 12:02 PM
