Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Cant decide which cams? Daily driver post your dynos and what duration you have

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #1  
BoostWhore's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
Cant decide which cams? Daily driver post your dynos and what duration you have

Im thinking either 264/264, 264/272 or 272/264. My car is a daily driver right now i have basic mods putting out 310 and 314tq on a mustang dyno. Ive been researching and i think the 264/272s give the most low end tq but does it matter that the tq falls off in the upper rpm ? please post some of your dynos and what cams your running so i can compare. I have shearced also im just stuck thanks
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #2  
Chris@nolimitmotors's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (277)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 2
From: long island,NY
280/280 soon to be. my 2005 evo is the only car i have. 10k on it
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 09:19 PM
  #3  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
I like 264 / 264 HKS

On the stock turbo and engine 272 does not give any significant gains and gives you a rough idle
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 02:27 AM
  #4  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
I'm very happy with 272/272... do a search with "272"/"Zeus" if you are interested in my opinions on the subject.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:24 AM
  #5  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
264/272 best of both worlds. 272 will not shine with the stock turbo.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 05:50 AM
  #6  
EvilDylan's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 499
Likes: 1
From: Huntsville, AL
272s for both and if you adjust your cam gears then you have no issues with idle. i made 304 whp on pump gas on dyno4mance's dynodynamics dyno.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #7  
Stinkapuss's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Southern MD
264's. My 03 made 319/312 on a mail in flash with these cams and trapped 111/112 on pump gas.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 05:58 AM
  #8  
evosilver's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
As far as i know having ur exhaust cam bigger than the other cam is better idle wise and maybe a little performance wise that is if u r going for a combination of 264 and 272 but for me on a stock turbo 280s did hell of a job :-)
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #9  
sir lurks alot's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
358whp/355tq with 280's and stock turbo, injectors and intercooler on 93 octane/alky
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #10  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
264's @ -2. No downfalls what-so-ever. Better drivability & WOT power!

On the vishnu board, dustin (vishnu employee) claimed that for the longest time, the best stg 1+ powered car was obtained with 264 hks cams.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:58 PM
  #11  
killr evo 8's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
272's. 333whp / 320tq with stock turbo, intercooler, and injectors on Mustang Dyno.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #12  
BoostWhore's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
Does anyone have the 264/272 setup? Looks like its that or straight 264's
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:46 PM
  #13  
James's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
From: NC
So what cams give the most performance and aren't bad for everyday type of driving? And what would i probably make having an 03 evo, with only an intake, make with cams?

thanks guys
james
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #14  
tke_413's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
I went from 296.9 to 342.8 on a mustang dyno just by adding GSC 264/264's. Stock turbo/intercooler/injectors/hotside/o2 housing/manifold/no alky etc. No idea what I'm at now. Daily driven and have not had any problems with them.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #15  
ArchieBabes's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
264/272 Here 380whp and 360wtq

360wtq - 350wtq from 3700 - 5200rpm

Can't beat that
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 AM.