My Evo VS 2g GS-T modded what ya think...
Jul 18, 2005, 06:05 AM
#18
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This won't be close at all, the mods on the GS-T aren't really anything, and the EVO is modified too. People who are saying that it will be close are pretty damn stupid. look DSMs are nice, but this DSM doesn't even have enough mods to hang with a stock EVO let alone a moddified one. So you dumb *** people say stock for stock a GS-T can hang with an EVO or if the two cars have the same botl on mods. His EVO is a 12 second car, the GS-T with those mods is a high 13/low 14 second car.
Jul 18, 2005, 06:41 AM
#20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you will kill him....the stock turbo on the GS-T is tiny compared to the EVO's turbo....20 pounds on that turbo still would not flow as much as an EVO stock
Jul 18, 2005, 06:48 AM
#21
Evolving Member
win by car lengths. fwd + t-25 = no win situation. If he was a GSX with a 16g it would be a different story. Race the guy in any gear and you will be putting car lengths on him.
Jul 18, 2005, 07:03 AM
#22
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern chicago burbs
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a GS-T with similar mods, Greddy profec B spec II, dejon tools upper IC, Greddy bov, turbo back exhaust, injen intake, poly motor mounts, wheels, some suspension work, SAFC (wasn't installed before my dyno run), stock turbo, and my car dynoed at 210whp. You Evo guys dyno a few ponies more, but weigh a little more than a 2g eclipse, no? I think it'll be a close race...With a dynoflash tho, you should beat him pretty easily.
Tell your buddy to turn the boost down to 16psi. The T25 is inefficient at anything higher than that. He won't be pushing out any more power because the turbo is just spewing out hot air.
And you guys who are saying AWD would beat FWD here, uh...did you not read they are running from a roll?
Tell your buddy to turn the boost down to 16psi. The T25 is inefficient at anything higher than that. He won't be pushing out any more power because the turbo is just spewing out hot air.
And you guys who are saying AWD would beat FWD here, uh...did you not read they are running from a roll?
Last edited by pacent; Jul 18, 2005 at 07:05 AM.
Jul 18, 2005, 07:10 AM
#23
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^I understand, if the EVO in question was stock, then yes a very close race, but the EVO is not stock now is it and you have a few more mods than the GS-T in this thread.
Jul 18, 2005, 07:14 AM
#24
Evolving Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: where the 2005 World Series Champions play
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^^ i love gsts by the way and owned one. but 210whp+15 for safc tuned properly is a little less then stock for an evo. with the evo's mods and he has about 260-270whp. even if his evo weighs a little more, it won't make up for 40 whp. plus my gst still broke loose when that turbo would hit in first gear, even from a roll. i would say a few car lengths, maybe not 5-6 but 3-4.
Jul 18, 2005, 07:14 AM
#25
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AWD vs. FWD, who cares, if the above EVO puts down around 260WHP vs. possibly 200WHP Eclipse, are you telling me, that the Eclipse will make up a 60WHP because it has FWD
.
.
Last edited by 3000ways; Jul 18, 2005 at 07:16 AM.
Jul 18, 2005, 07:19 AM
#26
No contest if he actually has the stock t-25. If he has a 14b conversion, which is the stock 1g turbo, then it would be closer, but probably not good enough. I went 12.58 @ 110 in my gs-t with those mods and a 14b, but the t25 sucks total ***...
